On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 16:33 +0200, Sven Köhler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i just wrote an init.d-script and i thought that the LANG variable was
> inherited since it set system-wide in /etc/env.d/02locale and therefor
> is also found in /etc/profile.env
Did you env-update?
>
> Now i noticed, that LANG is
maillog: 24/08/2005-08:26:26(+0100): Roy Marples types
> On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 16:33 +0200, Sven Köhler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i just wrote an init.d-script and i thought that the LANG variable was
> > inherited since it set system-wide in /etc/env.d/02locale and therefor
> > is also found in /etc
Ok, OpenLDAP2.2 has lasted nearly 2 months in stable, with no open bugs
against 2.2 itself. I've just put 2.2.28 in the tree, and it should fix
all remaining cases where strange build problems cropped up.
So this is now notice that I intend to move it into stable on x86 next
weekend (except if a m
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 17:27 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> > uberpc init.d # ./test start
> > * Starting service test
> > LANG=en_GB.utf8
> > LANGUAGE=en_GB.utf8
> > set | grep LANG
> > * Service test started OK
>
> Try unsetting the variable in your own shell first.
>
> lion init.d # /et
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 11:55 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 18 August 2005 11:19 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> > I'm thinking about adding bsdmk to main tree and make ash/csh use it to
> > find pmake
>
> considering the number of packages that use pmake, why do you want an ecla
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 15:11, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> | On Wednesday 03 August 2005 07:16 am, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> |>On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 09:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> |>>On Monday 01 August 2005 10:43 pm, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> |>
> |>Last time I checked,
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 08:45, Keziah W wrote:
> Hi all,
> I got this idea and I'm not sure if it would be feasible, but if it is,
> it could lead to many Cool Things:
> Is there any reason not to have dynamic libraries for most of the
> changes made by USE flags, that are used only if present, a
On Thursday 11 August 2005 05:49, Alec Warner wrote:
> Christian Parpart wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 August 2005 02:04, Carlos Silva wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >>What do you think of this?
> >
> > I once asked for a better place (namely metadata.xml), but got
> > corrected with the following reason:
> >
> The init script will not see those variables when it is run by /sbin/rc
> which is in turn run by init which is what happens on boot. The
> environment is empty then, and if you want to reproduce it accurately
> for your tests, you should do:
>
> env -i /etc/init.d/test restart
>
> It doe
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 22:53 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> packages which look like they have a funky dietlibc dependency:
> sys-apps/kudzu-knoppix
Actually, it is both sys-apps/kudzu and sys-apps/kudzu-knoppix which
require dietlibc for compiling the entire package. At least, the
Makefile uses
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 14:53 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Saturday 06 August 2005 20:18, Jeff Walter wrote:
> > Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 20:04:20 +0300
> > >
> > > Ivan Yosifov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>I am not sure if it is better, but you can
>
Hola all.
Out of curiousity, since for once my portage installation is *not*
filtering out all flags but my own, I'm wondering why it is that the
system default now holds a lot of use flags that aren't really related
to the system set of packages.
See, from my standpoint cascaded profiles exis
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 08:04 pm, Brian Harring wrote:
> Again, returning to the USE="-*" arguement, yes, they can go that
> route. It's also kind of a crappy arguement dodging out of the fact that
> progressive bloat going into what is effectively a base release
> profile, when subprofiles wo
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:50:58PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 August 2005 08:04 pm, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Again, returning to the USE="-*" arguement, yes, they can go that
> > route. It's also kind of a crappy arguement dodging out of the fact that
> > progressive bloat goin
On Aug 24, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
Hola all.
[...]
So, fex, the following flags are rather desktop specific-
alsa
arts
avi
bitmap-fonts
cups
eds
emboss (why the hell is "European Molecular Biology Open Software
Suite"
a profile default? Seems extremely specialized)
en
Hola all.
robbat2 made the suggestion, and after a bit of playing I think it's
best- in short, to support multiple DISTDIR's, we need either
intelligent querying of portage from bash side as to a files true
location, or a directory full of symlinks pointing at the ebuild's
stated files.
Latte
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:58:53PM -0400, Kristian Benoit wrote:
> Yeah, I'd really like having a snapshot, even if I'd prefer having
> cvs/svn access. You can send me it by mail or make it available
> somewhere.
Pardon the delay, wanted to iron out building code before
pushing the snapshot up- it
On Thursday 25 August 2005 11:30, Kito wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > So yeah, subprofiles, reasons why not?
>
> Aside from the work involved, I see no reason to not use the cascades
> for what they seem to be made for.
Perhaps this is something that should wait for
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:50:58PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>>On Wednesday 24 August 2005 08:04 pm, Brian Harring wrote:
>>
>>>Again, returning to the USE="-*" arguement, yes, they can go that
>>>route. It's also kind of a crappy arguement dodging out of the fact that
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 11:07 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Thursday 25 August 2005 11:30, Kito wrote:
> > On Aug 24, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > So yeah, subprofiles, reasons why not?
> >
> > Aside from the work involved, I see no reason to not use the cascades
> > for what the
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 09:27 pm, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:50:58PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 24 August 2005 08:04 pm, Brian Harring wrote:
> > > Again, returning to the USE="-*" arguement, yes, they can go that
> > > route. It's also kind of a crapp
21 matches
Mail list logo
