Re: [gentoo-dev] Find apps not ported to modular X

2006-01-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
The last drop: 465 to 401, a change of 64 in 1.5 days -- pretty solid! Lots of work done by Josh_B in the games categories, and misc. work by others, as well. Progress graph: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png Latest list: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Make logrotate a global USE flag?

2006-01-30 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Monday 30 January 2006 07:41, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > Another example of such issues is when i installed laptop-mode > tools for the first time: it messed my acpid configuration, because > it was adding in /etc/acpi/{events,actions}.d some handlers for > things i had already configu

Re: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-01-30 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Monday 30 January 2006 14:17, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > [ebuild R ] media-tv/kdetv-0.8.8-r1 USE="-arts -debug -lirc -opengl > -xinerama -zvbi" LINGUAS="it% -bg% -br% -ca% -cs% -cy% -da% -de% -el% > -en_GB% -es% -et% -fi% -fr% -ga% -gl% -hu% -is% -lt% -mt% -nb% -nl% -pa% > -pl% -

Re: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-01-30 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Monday 30 January 2006 16:43, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:17:36 +0100 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | Also, as repoman complain about linguas_blabla not being a valid > | useflags, all the linguas_* useflags should be listed in use.desc > > No, p

Re: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-01-30 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:46:28 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Monday 30 January 2006 16:43, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:17:36 +0100 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | Also, as repoman complain about linguas_blabla not being a val

Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-01-30 Thread Jakub Moc
30.1.2006, 12:46:28, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Monday 30 January 2006 16:43, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:17:36 +0100 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Petteno" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> | Also, as repoman complain about linguas_blabla not being a valid >> | useflags, all the linguas_*

Re: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-01-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 30 January 2006 13:31, Jakub Moc wrote: > maintaining lists of honored LINGUAS in each ebuild it just huge > maintenance overhead with no gain... Well at least for the KDE ebuilds that does honour it in a non-automatic version, the list is anyway needed, as I said, I hadn't had to prepar

Re: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-01-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 30 January 2006 12:43, Jason Stubbs wrote: > Not a huge difference but not exactly minor either. And of course > LINGUAS="" wouldn't be shown at all if nothing had changed with regard to > it and --verbose wasn't specified. That's a point to put them there, it's also quite interesting to

Re: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-01-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 30 January 2006 12:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > 2. Because USE_EXPAND is used for special USE things like arch and > userland, and because we undocumented the special arch USE flags > because they're not user settable. It was already discussed that those special arch USE flags, as soon as

Re: [gentoo-dev] NFP lack of progress

2006-01-30 Thread Ramon van Alteren
Grant Goodyear wrote: 5) Wildcard SSL certificate for infra (bug #117837). Kurt is pushing that through, and I assume it will pass. It's darn pricy, but it' not clear that there is really a good alternative. I don't know if this is already known but rapidssl.com are offering wildcar

Re: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-01-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 30 January 2006 06:17, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > Defining LINGUAS variable would be useful to allow people to know whether > they are going to have special support for their language in a package, but > it would also clutter the output quite a bit. Okay then.. I'm still looking l

Re: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-01-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 30 January 2006 11:15, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Monday 30 January 2006 06:17, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > > Defining LINGUAS variable would be useful to allow people to know whether > > they are going to have special support for their language in a package, > > but it

Re: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-01-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 30 January 2006 17:38, Mike Frysinger wrote: > it makes a the -pv output unreadable and thus useless ... although if you > do something like -pvv, then the user can expect to get a lot of output ... emerge -p is now less useless than before so it make sense for -pv to show lot of stuff..

[gentoo-dev] Re: IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-01-30 Thread Duncan
Mike Frysinger posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:38:35 -0500: > On Monday 30 January 2006 11:15, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: >> On Monday 30 January 2006 06:17, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: >> > Defining LINGUAS variable would be useful to allow people t

Re: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-01-30 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 06:17:36AM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > [ebuild R ] media-tv/kdetv-0.8.8-r1 USE="-arts -debug -lirc -opengl > -xinerama -zvbi" LINGUAS="it% -bg% -br% -ca% -cs% -cy% -da% -de% -el% -en_GB% > -es% -et% -fi% -fr% -ga% -gl% -hu% -is% -lt% -mt% -nb% -nl% -pa%

Re: [gentoo-dev] IUSE and LINGUAS?

2006-01-30 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 30 January 2006 11:48, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Monday 30 January 2006 17:38, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > it makes a the -pv output unreadable and thus useless ... although if you > > do something like -pvv, then the user can expect to get a lot of output > > ... > > emerge -p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repoman and his automagic

2006-01-30 Thread Dan Armak
On Saturday 28 January 2006 01:57, Alec Warner wrote: > Part of me does not want repoman to do automated tasks for developers, > and part of me wants a set of *well written* tools to aid developers in > their tasks. I mean when one commits say, all of kde, you don't want to > sit there and type in

[gentoo-dev] QA guides

2006-01-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Hi everybody, I think this is worth to be told here (and maybe also in next week's GWN wouldn't be bad, if I'm able to finish what I'm going to promise later in this mail). As people could have read on my blog, today I've added a new guide under the qa project and added a link from the project p

[gentoo-dev] slotted mysql ready for testing (~arch)

2006-01-30 Thread Francesco Riosa
As the subject say, In less than 24 hours slotted mysql ebuilds will be unmasked, to point the finger they are: =dev-db/mysql-4.1.16-r30 =dev-db/mysql-5.0.18-r30 There is a migration guide [1] that explain some of the magic, thanks to the editors: Chris White, Jan Kundrát, Joshua Saddler to make

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking modular X

2006-01-30 Thread Mark Loeser
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Jason Stubbs wrote: > > The patch now has the debugging output and x11-base/xorg-x11 check removed. > > Excellent. Works perfectly. Since we're failing on them, perhaps we can > say "obsolete" instead of "deprecated"? Can we put this back to being a war

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking modular X

2006-01-30 Thread Patrick McLean
Mark Loeser wrote: Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Jason Stubbs wrote: The patch now has the debugging output and x11-base/xorg-x11 check removed. Excellent. Works perfectly. Since we're failing on them, perhaps we can say "obsolete" instead of "deprecated"? Can we put this back to

[gentoo-dev] Re: Unmasking modular X

2006-01-30 Thread Joshua Jackson
Mark Loeser gentoo.org> writes: > > Donnie Berkholz gentoo.org> said: > > Jason Stubbs wrote: > > > The patch now has the debugging output and x11-base/xorg-x11 check > > > removed. > > > > Excellent. Works perfectly. Since we're failing on them, perhaps we can > > say "obsolete" instead of "

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Unmasking modular X

2006-01-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Joshua Jackson wrote: I will have to agree that this change has made it a pain to mark anything stable. I had 4 out of the 6 I did today bail out because of this. I took the simple easy fix and removed the check to stabalize the packages I needed to. I know we have people who want modular X yeste

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Unmasking modular X

2006-01-30 Thread Joshua Jackson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Joshua Jackson wrote: >> I will have to agree that this change has made it a pain to mark >> anything >> stable. I had 4 out of the 6 I did today bail out because of this. >> I took the >> simple easy fix and removed the check

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Unmasking modular X

2006-01-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Joshua Jackson wrote: > In the oldest version of the package (as all these were), I don't see > much point in the change. They will be removed within a fairly short > amount of time. Fairly short meaning what, 6 months? A lot of old ebuilds tend to stick around forever. > Secondary, you are sugg