Mike Frysinger wrote:
> - we were invited to a convention O'Reilly hosts (forgot the name)
OSCON, and it's really quite good dev/suit ratio. I was there last year,
along with Corey and some other OSL people. I'd like to get a booth if
we can have enough people to staff it.
Thanks,
Donnie
signa
Maybe your answer has already been answered somewhere in this thread,
here are some threads on the forums on this issue (some are about
older versions, but the reasons are likely the same):
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-335187.html
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-446306.html
Searching
On Friday 07 April 2006 17:47, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
> What Alec said, however, this would require that we have interested
> developers who would subscribe and be active when they can, to avoid it
> becoming another -user.
>
> But yes, I like that idea too! Thank you.
Actually -user used to h
Hi Gentoo devs,
The Problem: I'd like to have bookmarks for my most used documentation
in my browser. E.g., for the Python documentation this would be
file:///usr/share/doc/python-docs-2.4.2/html/index.html. But as the
version number is included in the path, I have to update the bookmark
every tim
Fabian Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I'd like portage do to is to create a symlink to the latest version
> of a package's documentation. Just omitting the version number would of
> course not work as slotted packages may have multiple versions of docs
> installed. The first format co
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 17:48:12 +0200,
Fabian Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to have bookmarks for my most used documentation in my
> browser.
Yup, me too. See bug #67130.
The feature is optional (you have to set DOC_SYMLINKS_DIR in make.conf).
Symlinks are autocreated when there is
Have you submitted a bugzilla as a request or suggestion - that's the best way
to get it acted on .
On Saturday April 8 2006 11:48, Fabian Neumann wrote:
> Hi Gentoo devs,
>
> The Problem: I'd like to have bookmarks for my most used documentation
> in my browser. E.g., for the Python documentatio
On Saturday 08 April 2006 00:52, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> highly suspect statements
>
> these states are all quite common ... trying to make some kind of
> supposition as to which is the most common is a waste of time
No. It's my opinion. Respect it, please. You don't have to agree.
> in my experi
I dislike the idea to create lots of symlinks for that reason. But I'm having
a bug¹ open at mozilla.org with the goal to create rss feeds from the
documentation.
Carsten
[¹] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332095
pgpBhuQuKgGb2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Graham Murray wrote:
Fabian Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What I'd like portage do to is to create a symlink to the latest version
of a package's documentation. Just omitting the version number would of
course not work as slotted packages may have multiple versions of docs
installed. The
Graham Murray wrote:
> What would be even nicer would be if it could create and maintain an
> html index, for example at /usr/share/doc/index.html, to all package
> html documentation in a similar way to that which gnu info maintains
> the top level index to all info documentation on the system.
Y
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Saturday 08 April 2006 00:52, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> highly suspect statements
>>
>> these states are all quite common ... trying to make some kind of
>> supposition as to which is the most common is a waste of time
>
> No. It's my opinion. Respect it, please. You don'
Simon Stelling wrote:
Graham Murray wrote:
Fabian Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What I'd like portage do to is to create a symlink to the latest version
of a package's documentation. Just omitting the version number would of
course not work as slotted packages may have multiple versions
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
* If we're looking to increase the flow of end users -> super users ->
developers, perhaps we should focus more upon improving development
tools or development documentation.
I'm a little late jumping into this and I haven't read all the threads yet,
however I agree wit
Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
I would also suggest creation of a gentoo-dev-help@ mailing-list.
Something similar to what, i guess, the homonym IRC chan is, but for
people who don't like IRC.
I like this idea as well and agree with the reasoning snip'ed out. As for other
mail about -user,
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 09:51:58 +0100 "Christopher O'Neill"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Ideally, what I'd like is for the various dev teams to compile a
| weekly status report, which could then be compiled into the weekly
| newsletter (which currently seems to be lacking much
Carsten Lohrke gentoo.org> writes:
> How do you want not to enforce it?
Have you actually read the proposal? It's quite sensible and is entitled:
"Proposal: Integrated boot themes on LiveCDs and installations"
I suppose that the themes would be defaulted to on the LiveCDs and optional
for regu
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 11:37:01 +0100
Jonathan Coome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think planet.gentoo.org helps in this regard, but there could be a
> lot more done to keep end users aware of what's going on.
>
It certainly does, but having some way to further organise this information by
package
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 14:07 -0500, lnxg33k wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> > * If we're looking to increase the flow of end users -> super users ->
> > developers, perhaps we should focus more upon improving development
> > tools or development documentation.
>
> I'm a little late jumping int
I apologize if this is a resend, but it seemed to me like the 1st attempt
didn't get through (can't imagine why it would take longer than a couple
of days to get to a gentoo-hosted mailing list from a gentoo-hosted mail
account...)
--
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Christopher O'Neill wrote:
There has been no upstream release in years, and the download URLs no
longer work. It also has some open bugs (bug #127131). If anyone
wishes to step up and maintain this, please do so within the next 30
days, or I am removing it from the tree.
Thanks,
--
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cp
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 00:40 +, S. Lockwood-Childs wrote:
> I apologize if this is a resend, but it seemed to me like the 1st attempt
> didn't get through (can't imagine why it would take longer than a couple
> of days to get to a gentoo-hosted mailing list from a gentoo-hosted mail
> account...
22 matches
Mail list logo
