Hello.
Anatoly raised really important concern and currently I've started to
think about fix. One possible solution requires virtual/editor to suite
glep 37 and thus affects many packages. So... wondering why this change
was not done I'd like to discuss the problem on the list.
Problem:
There
On 11/12/06, Peter Volkov (pva) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The possible solution is to add virtual/editor ebuild
this is a horrible idea
why not modify sudo to not filter the EDITOR env var then there is no
more problem
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:34:25AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 11/12/06, Peter Volkov (pva) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The possible solution is to add virtual/editor ebuild
this is a horrible idea
why not modify sudo to not filter the EDITOR env var then there is no
more problem
Except
On 11/12/06, Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:34:25AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 11/12/06, Peter Volkov (pva) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The possible solution is to add virtual/editor ebuild
this is a horrible idea
why not modify sudo to not filter the
why not modify sudo to not filter the EDITOR env var then there is no
more problem
no, there is a very valid reason why sudo filters the EDITOR env var.
sudo should probably be fixed to (re)set the EDITOR variable to a 'safe'
systemwide default, instead of stripping it completely.
is there a
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:56:33AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 11/12/06, Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:34:25AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 11/12/06, Peter Volkov (pva) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The possible solution is to add virtual/editor ebuild
On 2006-11-12 at 04:34 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
why not modify sudo to not filter the EDITOR env var then there is no
more problem
Considering that this is the only situation where environment is
dropped... yes this fixes sudo problem. The other possible solution is:
#!/bin/bash
export
On 11/12/06, Thilo Bangert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there a list of sudo 'safe' EDITORs somewhere?
then we end up with having to maintain a list of safe EDITORs and
dealing with people who want to edit their own favorite editor
the sudo file has the ability to specify editor's, so why not
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 05:26 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
then we end up with having to maintain a list of safe EDITORs and
dealing with people who want to edit their own favorite editor
the sudo file has the ability to specify editor's, so why not tell
people to change their sudo config file
then we end up with having to maintain a list of safe EDITORs anddealing with people who want to edit their own favorite editor
the sudo file has the ability to specify editor's, so why not tellpeople to change their sudo config file ?It's not automatic.Other way is remove virtual/editor. And set
On 11/12/06, Peter Volkov (pva) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And does not prevents sudo from
removing EDITOR from environment.
in the example usages you cited, people where using `sudo` to just
avoid running `su -` first ... in other words, their sudo was
unlimited ... updating the sudoers file to
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 12:27:12PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
work[3,4] (yes... if EDITOR is not set). But EDITOR *is not* set when
program is started from sudo because sudo for security reasons drops
environment (are there any other cases when environment is dropped?).
You can set
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
KingTaco and I are pleased to announce that we've completed
setting up and testing the anonymous read-only CVS and SVN
services for Gentoo repositories, and that they are now
available for use.
Thanks go to: kengland, robbat2, kingtaco, ramereth, and
several others
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 05:54 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
in the example usages you cited, people where using `sudo` to just
avoid running `su -` first ... in other words, their sudo was
unlimited ... updating the sudoers file to allow EDITOR via env_keep
would work fine for them
in that
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 11:06 +, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
You can set `Defaults env_keep=EDITOR` in your sudoers file if you
want, or what I do is `Defaults:%wheel !env_reset`, to allow users in
group wheel to use sudo without the environment being scrubbed.
Of course I know about that. And I
Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
Or... what do you mean by that:
the sudo file has the ability to specify editor's, so why not tell
people to change their sudo config file ?
English is not my native language thus may be I just misunderstood your
idea here. Sorry.
...that the people should specify
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:32:56PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 11:06 +, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
You can set `Defaults env_keep=EDITOR` in your sudoers file if you
want, or what I do is `Defaults:%wheel !env_reset`, to allow users in
group wheel to use sudo
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:30:48PM +0500, Anatoly Shipitsin wrote:
You can set `Defaults env_keep=EDITOR` in your sudoers file if you want,
or what I do is `Defaults:%wheel !env_reset`, to allow users in group
wheel to use sudo without the environment being scrubbed.
Ok. How you plan set
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 12:15 +, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
The only `hardcoded` editor is the fallback editor for
visudo
And this is the problem I'm talking about. I do not see any reasons to
keep this not working fallback. There are parts of code that just do not
work in Gentoo.
which can be
This question is nonsensical. I guess you dont understand what sudodoes, it's too complicated to explain here, you should consult the
documentation.I'm told about emerge package not runtime. May you don't understand me.Check sudo-1.6.8_p9-r2.ebuildIn DEPEND we see virtual/editor butin configure
On behalf of Russian translators team members I'd like to say thank you
for your work guys! This greatly simplifies translators work to
translate and keep translations updated. This also allows to create
Russian website synchronized with gentoo.org also with Russian specific
additions.
Thank you
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:21:21PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 12:15 +, Tavis Ormandy wrote:
The only `hardcoded` editor is the fallback editor for
visudo
And this is the problem I'm talking about. I do not see any reasons to
keep this not working fallback.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:56:33AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 11/12/06, Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:34:25AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 11/12/06, Peter Volkov (pva) [EMAIL
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 6:00 am, Stuart Herbert wrote:
Reposted from http://planet.gentoo.org for the devs who live in
caves^H^H^Hdon't read planet.gentoo.org.
Best regards,
Stu
--
http://www.flickr.com/groups/gentoo/
Whilst sat here this morning waiting for the NX packages to build,
Talking specifically about sudo, I think you're making a big deal out ofa very minor thing, primarily because I cannot think of a sane example
of when $EDITOR and $VISUAL are not set and visudo (which requires aninteractive editor) would be invoked.It's problem exist for any package use configure
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 06:21:56PM +0500, Anatoly Shipitsin wrote:
This question is nonsensical. I guess you dont understand what sudo
does, it's too complicated to explain here, you should consult the
documentation.
I'm told about emerge package not runtime. May you don't understand me.
I
On Friday 03 November 2006 1:15 pm, Jon Portnoy wrote:
I've been mostly inactive for a good while but hanging on mostly for
sentimentality's sake, it's past time for that to stop.
I mostly only maintain a small handful of ebuilds, I'm sure they can
find proper homes quickly. None are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anatoly Shipitsin wrote:
This question is nonsensical. I guess you dont understand what sudo
does, it's too complicated to explain here, you should consult the
documentation.
I'm told about emerge package not runtime. May you don't understand
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 09:29:48AM -0600, Mike Doty wrote:
then fcron(or whatever package this is from) is *broken*
Either that, or you dont know what it does.
Thanks, Tavis.
--
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | finger me for my pgp key.
Check sudo-1.6.8_p9-r2.ebuild In DEPEND we see virtual/editor but
in configure --with-editor=/bin/nano But virtual/editor can provide by vi nano etc editor. You think its right? DEPEND set virtual/editor but configure use nano as hardcoded editor.
Yes, I think it's right. That option doesnt do
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 08:38:52PM +0500, Anatoly Shipitsin wrote:
I'm think if we set hardcoded editor nano at configure in sudo,ebuild its
should DEPEND at nano editor not virtual/editor.
Then you would be wrong.
Use abstract depend provide by same packages and set hardcoded depend
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 08:17:18PM +0500, Anatoly Shipitsin wrote:
Talking specifically about sudo, I think you're making a big deal out of
a very minor thing, primarily because I cannot think of a sane example
of when $EDITOR and $VISUAL are not set and visudo (which requires an
interactive
Use abstract depend provide by same packages and set hardcoded depend
provided by one package (nano) is right?No, is not right.But why it's not need change? I'm talk not only sudo.
Doctor, it hurts when I do thisvery funny :)
It isnt hardcoded, it's configurable.If this not hardcoded. I'm think use this at new fcron ebuild. This really close problem bug #149376 ;)
No, you set the correct editor, I dont know which one you use.
I'm told about ebuild. I'm can use
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 08:59:03PM +0500, Anatoly Shipitsin wrote:
Use abstract depend provide by same packages and set hardcoded depend
provided by one package (nano) is right?
No, is not right.
But why it's not need change? I'm talk not only sudo.
I dont know about the other packages,
Hi!
Recently I have noticed that the openssh-4.4p1 ebuild lists the sftplogging
use flag as deprecated (4.3 does have it). I found no mention of this being
removed for any reason in the ChangeLog. Could anybody please tell what
happened?
Thanks!
Regards,
Sab
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
Although I do think you're making a big fuss over a tiny cosmeticissue.
This changes need not for sudo. It's need for fcron. And probaly any package use define editor on configuration stage.
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Cédric cedk Krier. He is joining
us to help with the netmon herd. Previously he has been filling the
bugzilla with new ebuilds and participating in the sunrise overlay.
He hails from Liège, Belgium. He works as an architect engineer in a
tiny company. He likes
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 08:43:55AM -0600, Mike Doty wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:56:33AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 11/12/06, Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:34:25AM -0500,
Tach Hector, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Hector E. Gomez Morales schrieb:
My name is Hector I am a CS student in third year. I have a interest in
programming languages specially in functional programming, I have been
using scheme for some time so I will like to
Xbox-sources has multiple pending security bugs against it, and is
unmaintained. As such, it is going into package.mask in the next few days,
and will be removed from the tree 30 days after it goes into package.mask if
no one takes over maintaining.
--
Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Gentoo Kernel
It's nice to see someone from nearby join Gentoo. (I live in Leuven)
Welcome to the project!! I suppose we'll see you at the next FOSDEM? :)
Stefaan
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 21:57:07 +0500
Anatoly Shipitsin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although I do think you're making a big fuss over a tiny cosmetic
issue.
This changes need not for sudo. It's need for fcron. And probaly
any
package use define editor on configuration stage.
No, it's
Petteri Räty schrieb:
So please give cedk the usual warm welcome.
Welcome and make yourself at home :D
Jokey
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 10:33:00PM -0500, Michael Cummings wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 02:54:01AM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
svn has the following repos:
gli glsr devmanual sandbox baselayout
eselect apache livecd-tools hardened linux-patches
catalyst hwdata gentoo-python
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Christian:
Thanks for the response, I will try to help with all the bugs I can in
dev-scheme, Matthew has sent me some pointers for becoming a developer
and helping with the ebuilds.
Hector
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Tach Hector,
On Sun, 2006-01-10 at 11:08 -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
Hi,
There have been no release since June 2004, the newer versions have
p.masked since 2004. The older versions doesnt build. They have open
bugs #62182, #88929 and #101581.
I'll remove them on November 1st.
Gabber is gone.. All
No, it's not needed for fcron at all, and I already explained why in[1]. Progressing through [2-4] I thought the fcron issue might have
been fixed, but the virtual/editor discussion had started by then and Idecided I had nothing more to add. Again: fcron builds and works finewithout at all setting
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:20:09 +0500
Anatoly Shipitsin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Without --with-editor fcrom configure get editor from enviroment
parameter EDITOR.
This is wrong see bug 149376.
You mean I ought to go read the bug I referred to a few times in the
message you are responding to?
On Sunday 12 November 2006 11:38, Rumi Szabolcs wrote:
Could anybody please tell what happened?
it's been integrated upstream so there's no point in having a patch anymore
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sunday 12 November 2006 06:29, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 05:54 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
in the example usages you cited, people where using `sudo` to just
avoid running `su -` first ... in other words, their sudo was
unlimited ... updating the sudoers file to
On Sunday 12 November 2006 16:16, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
Xbox-sources has multiple pending security bugs against it
#'s ? searching bugzilla for xbox doesnt give me any results
-mike
and is unmaintained.
says you :P
-mike
pgpO3uvUpTD6Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
how do people feel about adding --docdir=/usr/share/doc/${PF} to the default
econf() arguments ?
-mike
pgpPzp9cOoqXM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mike Frysinger wrote:
how do people feel about adding --docdir=/usr/share/doc/${PF} to the default
econf() arguments ?
-mike
As my first Gentoo related thing since my 3 day trip...
Sounds great by me. I know it'll remove the need to do that manually in
a couple of ebuilds since upstream uses
You mean I ought to go read the bug I referred to a few times in themessage you are responding to? I did. In fact, I wrote a lot of the
comments there. I am CC'd on that bug. I even recorded the originalcomplaint on that bug stating that the ebuild should not rely on theenvironment to find a value
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 12:51:45AM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
how do people feel about adding --docdir=/usr/share/doc/${PF} to the
default
econf() arguments ?
-mike
[...]
And it seems like a default which won't cause something unnecessary.
Let's see how
56 matches
Mail list logo
