On Sun, March 18, 2007 10:53 pm, Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:46:40 +
Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which is why I was saying there was no point in a ~/.config
directory...
Generally speaking one lists the contents of one's home directory more
often than one
Pierre-Yves Rofes wrote:
Well, I'd tend to say that it's not noticeable even under $(HOME) because
one issues a ls [-l] more often than a ls -a[l].
Besides, moving all into ~/.config is just moving the problem somewhere
else, not really solving it.
Agreed. It's just moving the problem
On Monday 19 March 2007, Pierre-Yves Rofes wrote:
Well, I'd tend to say that it's not noticeable even under $(HOME) because
one issues a ls [-l] more often than a ls -a[l].
Besides, moving all into ~/.config is just moving the problem somewhere
else, not really solving it.
what is the problem
On Monday 19 March 2007, Josh Saddler wrote:
I prefer per app configs right in my homedir, not in ~/.config/ --
this isnt really a point that will ever be solved ... you'll always have
people who prefer the classical *nix approach over anything else
-mike
pgptP04nsuaBx.pgp
Description: PGP
On Sunday 18 March 2007, Simon Stelling wrote:
Petteri Räty wrote:
Many applications save preferences in ~/.app/. When testing
applications please make sure you test with an empty directory to catch
cases when an upgrade works fine but a clean install doesn't. Thanks.
Even better: Fix
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 03:38 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
what is the problem as you see it ? the nice thing about having a ~/.config/
is that it's a directory that can obviously be added to backups or sync
programs for keeping $HOME the same across multiple machines ... you dont
have to
On 2007/03/19, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the nice thing about having a ~/.config/ [...]
Other nice things about it come from it not being an hardcoded path,
but just a default for $XDG_CONFIG_HOME.
For instance, when testing a new version of an application, you can
On Monday 19 March 2007, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 03:38 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
what is the problem as you see it ? the nice thing about having a
~/.config/ is that it's a directory that can obviously be added to
backups or sync programs for keeping $HOME the same
On 19/03/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 19 March 2007, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 03:38 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
what is the problem as you see it ? the nice thing about having a
~/.config/ is that it's a directory that can obviously be added
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 10:46:22 +0100
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing we could do would be to separate hierarchy from version
naming.
This is where upstream version numbers fail to have a decent order
(like your example where later versions have lower version numbers).
# Raúl Porcel armin76 at gentoo dot org (19 Mar 2007)
# Pending removal 18 May 2007, for treecleaners
# Bug 150966, doesn't work with gcc4 and no new version for 4+ years
www-servers/plb
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
if you're going to change the topic mid-thread, then you should update
the subject
Ah apologies for that; I just wanted to get the technical objection.
you already know the state of the server/client debate ... moving it to
global doesnt fix any of the short comings, so it should stay local
Steve Long wrote:
I don't see what is so dangerous about a server flag. After all I
don't set doc globally, but it is a useful global flag, with clear
intent, as would be server.
Does it mean:
A) Compile just the server, as leaving it off compiles both client
AND server
B) Compile the client
/me reads one Scroll of Blessing
--
Jim Ramsay
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:28 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Caleb Cushing wrote:
Perhaps they're more
interested in generating ad revenue from whipped-up scandals...
or maybe they have a point. distrowatch hpd ranking show's us down from a
few years ago we
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
I think the time has come for me to retire as a gentoo dev. There are
multiple reasons to that, but mainly, it has stopped being fun a good
while ago, and I don't like where I see the project heading.
Man well if it stopped being fun, fair enuff. I hope you'll continue
Jim Ramsay wrote:
Steve Long wrote:
I don't see what is so dangerous about a server flag. After all I
don't set doc globally, but it is a useful global flag, with clear
intent, as would be server.
Does it mean:
A) Compile just the server, as leaving it off compiles both client
AND
Seriously.
Everybody go to distrowatch and click on the little Gentoo no the right
and watch what happens. If we got everybody to do it, then suddenly
Gentoo must be the most popular distribution on the planet!
Is that going to prove anything but Gentoo supporters infancy?
Love,
H
--
Alexandre Buisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- tex is basically unmaintained. Perhaps ehmsen can be talked out of
MIA, though I guess he's pretty busy at the moment, and Opfer also
seemed quite interested. I've received a couple offers from users
who would like to get more involved but so far no
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:17:19 +, Steve Long wrote:
TBH I think all that was needed was saying that the pre-existing rules
apply to all on the dev m-l, and actually *enforcing* those rules for
devs. Devrel is clearly not set up for that, so I support the new
dev-mods (sorry proctors is a
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 18:54 +0100, Michael Krelin wrote:
Seriously.
Everybody go to distrowatch and click on the little Gentoo no the right
and watch what happens. If we got everybody to do it, then suddenly
Gentoo must be the most popular distribution on the planet!
Is that going
On 19/03/07, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 18:54 +0100, Michael Krelin wrote:
Seriously.
Everybody go to distrowatch and click on the little Gentoo no the right
and watch what happens. If we got everybody to do it, then suddenly
Gentoo must be the
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 18:54 +0100, Michael Krelin wrote:
Seriously.
Everybody go to distrowatch and click on the little Gentoo no the right
and watch what happens. If we got everybody to do it, then suddenly
Gentoo must be the most popular distribution on the planet!
Is that going to prove
On 2007.03.19 00:10, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
Hi,
[snip resignation]
Alexandre,
We have not worked together and have only spoken briefly on IRC. OSS is
a kind of anarchy, you only get what you fight for.
Your post contains a lot of good ideas, even though it comes over as as
words
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 21:34:09 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
On 2007.03.19 00:10, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
Hi,
[snip resignation]
Alexandre,
We have not worked together and have only spoken briefly on IRC. OSS is
a kind of anarchy, you only get what you fight for.
Yes, and it's
TBH I think all that was needed was saying that the pre-existing rules
apply to all on the dev m-l, and actually *enforcing* those rules for devs.
Devrel is clearly not set up for that, so I support the new dev-mods (sorry
proctors is a silly name imnsho as only Americans get it. I understand
Steve Long wrote:
Yeah -- server is way too generic. I've forgotten where else I use it,
but when I build vnc I use it to get a VNC server. Maybe make a local
vnc-server USE flag for that one.
I don't see what is so dangerous about a server flag. After all I don't set
doc globally, but it
070319 Michael Krelin wrote:
someone wrote :
Seriously.
Everybody go to distrowatch and click on the little Gentoo on the right
I mistook seriously as relating to the rest of your letter
Your name suggests you're not a native speaker.
It's a common trick of stand-up comedians
to introduce
# Michael Sterrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19 Mar 2007)
# masked for removal in April.
# Old and nasty. Not supported by upstream.
# use the newer versions of clanlib instead.
=dev-games/clanlib-0.6*
media-libs/hermes
games-sports/trophy
games-action/clanbomber
games-puzzle/pingus
Michael Sterrett
On Monday 19 March 2007, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
To this end it would also be useful if the QA notices were _all_ sent to
the elog report; the Files were installed with user/group portage one
is, but I don't think any of the others are.
add qa to your elog classes and any messages that still
On Monday 19 March 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
Is eqawarn something we can use in eclasses? We have quite a few QA
checks in the java eclasses that could potentially make use of this
function. If it's not part of the public API we can of course just if it
exists and fall back to echo.
it isnt
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
On Monday 19 March 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
Is eqawarn something we can use in eclasses? We have quite a few QA
checks in the java eclasses that could potentially make use of this
function. If it's not part of the public API we can of course just if it
exists and
32 matches
Mail list logo
