# Alin Năstac [EMAIL PROTECTED] (17 Apr 2007)
# Pending for removal on 17 May 2007
# Reasons:
#- all keywords are -arch (except for x86)
#- source has numerous QA violations
#- unmaintained for years
net-dialup/slirp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 06:01, Jakub Moc wrote:
So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish!
I'm sad to see you go but I can't say that I don't understand you. It has been
great having you shove security bugs our way when needed.
Thank you for your work and best of luck with your future endeavours.
Jakub Moc kirjoitti:
On 4/17/07, Bryan Østergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 06:01:46AM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Whoever is in charge, kindly change my bugzilla account to the email
address this mail is sent from and take care of the setting the
bugzilla privs
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 16:01:46 Jakub Moc wrote:
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
I'm therefore resigning from this project.
I would be grateful if somebody could refer me to the
Christopher Sawtell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 16:01:46 Jakub Moc wrote:
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any
more. I'm therefore resigning from this project.
I would be
Petteri Räty wrote:
You can still set a watch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Better:
you can take your account back in 2 weeks, in the mean time please have
a vacation, think about ways to not get too annoyed by people in dummy
mode (like me and others from time to time) and please don't be angry
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 22:32:34 Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Christopher Sawtell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 16:01:46 Jakub Moc wrote:
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 23:42:36 Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:35:01PM +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
I just hope we are not going to get overly 'precious' about this CoC
thing, which btw, I note contains the colloquial phrase 'If you screw
up ...'. That sort of lazy
Sad to see you go. In my pov you really did a good job.
I hope the ones in charge of bugzilla come with a solution to this.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:35:01PM +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
I just hope we are not going to get overly 'precious' about this CoC thing,
which btw, I note contains the colloquial phrase 'If you screw up ...'.
That sort of lazy slang language has no place in the official document set
On 4/17/07, Bryan Østergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And just to be even more clear about this - his bad behaviour isn't only
about language but also about his actions on bugzilla such as
reassigning bugs without trying to contact maintainers first,
reassigning bugs against the maintainers
Actually please exclude the KDE project and its herds from your patch.
I'd prefer to handle that manually.
Thanks again!
On 4/17/07, Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 04:10:14PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
I made a patch to remove all retired developers from
Ioannis Aslanidis kirjoitti:
Actually please exclude the KDE project and its herds from your patch.
I'd prefer to handle that manually.
Thanks again!
Sure. Just do it this week and it will not show up when I commit it next
week.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On 4/17/07, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jakub Moc wrote:
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
I'm therefore resigning from this project.
OMG NO! Please reconsider.
I'm pretty
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:04:39AM -0500, Jeffrey Gardner wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jakub Moc wrote:
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
I'm therefore
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 04:10:14PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
I made a patch to remove all retired developers from the project pages.
If anyone doesn't object I will commit this next week.
Removing the dev tags is fine, but please don't remove the author
tags. They show who created the page -
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 07:43 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
Jakub Moc wrote:
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
I'm therefore resigning from this project.
While there are situations in
On 4/17/07, Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
holding developers to higher
standards is completely in line with the council wishes I believe.
Indeed. I've noticed the high standards being pushed by devrel quite a
couple of times, such as in [1]. So Bret, I sincerely hope you'll get
your
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 09:04 -0500, Jeffrey Gardner wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jakub Moc wrote:
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
I'm therefore resigning
Bryan Østergaard wrote:
snip
On the contrary we warn people about not behaving badly and if that
doesn't help despite many warnings and complaints being filed we finally
take to firmer action which is exactly what have happened in this case.
snip
Regards,
Bryan Østergaard
Sorry, I am going
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 04:10:14PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
I made a patch to remove all retired developers from the project pages.
If anyone doesn't object I will commit this next week.
Removing the dev tags is fine, but please don't remove the author
tags. They
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:01:46 +0200
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
I'm therefore resigning from this project.
I'm sorry to see you go. I'm personally
I hope I won't forget! :)
On 4/17/07, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ioannis Aslanidis kirjoitti:
Actually please exclude the KDE project and its herds from your patch.
I'd prefer to handle that manually.
Thanks again!
Sure. Just do it this week and it will not show up when I
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 16:10 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I made a patch to remove all retired developers from the project pages.
If anyone doesn't object I will commit this next week.
Feel free to commit any hardened or embedded corrections you have
anytime you become aware of them.
Thanks.
--
I would like to take this time to note and re-affirm the proper bug
assignment policy and have it noted somewhere officially in Gentoo Policy.
Bugs that are created for the purpose of getting arches to keyword or
stabilize a particular package should initially be assigned to the
herd/maintainer
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:56:58 -0400
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to take this time to note and re-affirm the proper bug
assignment policy and have it noted somewhere officially in Gentoo
Policy.
Bugs that are created for the purpose of getting arches to keyword or
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:56:58 -0400
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once all but the last arch has keyworded said package, it is
acceptable and proper for a bug wrangler and/or maintainer/herd to
re-assign the bug to the last remaining arch and they remove that
arch from CC. They should
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 14:56 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
I would like to take this time to note and re-affirm the proper bug
assignment policy and have it noted somewhere officially in Gentoo Policy.
Bugs that are created for the purpose of getting arches to keyword or
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:50:26PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
On 4/17/07, Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bugs that are created for the purpose of getting arches to keyword or
stabilize a particular package should initially be assigned to the
herd/maintainer of said package with
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
In my opinion the last architecture should also remove the old ebuild
they have just made obsolete by stabling/keywording the new version,
since they commit to the directory anyway.
This might be good, but also bad. I usually let the older stable version
linger in our
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 21:50 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
It would be cool to implement a [EMAIL PROTECTED] alias just to
assign those bugs to so that we maintainers do not need to see them.
While you may not find them useful, there have been 3 recent occasions
of user requesting things get
Steev Klimaszewski wrote: [Tue Apr 17 2007, 08:58:59AM CDT]
Bryan Østergaard wrote:
snip
On the contrary we warn people about not behaving badly and if that
doesn't help despite many warnings and complaints being filed we finally
take to firmer action which is exactly what have happened in
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:19:14 +0200
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, you've miserably failed, you should have retired this guy long
time ago before things went this far, since he obviously doesn't care
about Gentoo users, but just about his territorial pissings. Instead,
you've chosen
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 10:44:09PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:19:14 +0200
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, you've miserably failed, you should have retired this guy long
time ago before things went this far, since he obviously doesn't care
about Gentoo
On 4/18/07, Bryan Østergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, I didn't set out to threaten him in any way but after 30 minutes
with no response to my question and even more angry devs demanding me to
solve this situation I had to do something to stop it. I personally
think trying to talk to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
It would be cool to implement a [EMAIL PROTECTED] alias just to
assign those bugs to so that we maintainers do not need to see them.
Or maybe implement new bugzilla keywords, like STABLEREQ and KEYWORDREQ
which would be
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:12:26 +0200
From: Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-core] [POLICY] Keywording/Stabilizing Bug
Assignment Policy
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:50:26 +0200
Stefan Schweizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a
Can you guys move all this garbage to the gentoo-devrel mailing list?
This is exactly the kind of discussion it exists for. This has nothing
to do with development.
Thanks,
Donnie
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Dan Meltzer wrote:
Man first you devs think it's your god-given right to behave nastily to
any usr, then you get all sensitive about Jakub on bugzilla. That is
lame, imo. Maybe there should be something about requiring a thick skin
to be a dev, since you so clearly require it of usrs.
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Steve Long wrote:
But seriously.. why don't you guys switch off reply-to munging, already?!
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_120444.xml
http://dev.gentoo.org/~wolf31o2/xml/reply-to.xml for those of you that
care.
Thank you.
Some of the most popular mail
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 17:37 +0200, Naga wrote:
is it allowed with a grep call in portage (ebuild.sh)?
The reason I'm asking is because I was thinking of a way of handling non
standard file suffixes to standard archive formats (as in bug: 174910 [1]).
The way I was thinking of was to run
41 matches
Mail list logo
