From ubuntu-bugs-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com Sun Mar 07 02:25:46 2010
Return-path:
Envelope-to: arch...@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 02:25:46 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx284.postini.com ([64.18.0.108] helo=psmtp.com)
by mail-archive.com with smtp (Exim 4.69)
(e
Steve Long napsal(a):
How do others feel about such an addition?
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_a450013b143e01a25810f66ff345c9d4.xml
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Pri
s on such monster bug and watch the resulting huge
bugspam landing in bug-wranglers and other people's mailboxes, it's
extremely annoying, extremely messy and generally not a good way to
things fixed.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subk
art
immediately to make it in time for 2008.0.
Have a nice day. :P
[1] http://compsoc.dur.ac.uk/whitespace/
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piet_(programming_language)
[3] http://www.rapapaing.com/piet/
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp
his irrelevant junk finally, it's
totally off-topic here; if you want to complain that noone loves you,
then go to your nanny, I'm not interested.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
P
es.
Wrt pidgin - seriously, what's the big issue here? Users can't use
emerge -pv output and determine what they want, or? Will we bloat the
profiles everytime someone forgets to enable a flag and goes complain
upstream about a 'missing' feature?
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mail
't we use current gentoo-announce list for seems to exist for
this exact purpose? In that way, people who wish to participate in
on-topic, off-topic or straight retarded debates would still have the
choice to do so, while not forcing the majority of others to 'mark
folder as read' eve
7;s throat.
:X
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: O
ed is the eclass and a sample how to use it with netqmail.
>
> It seems like you aren't interested in communication with the
> maintainer, otherwise you would've CC'ed me.
Erm? This was completely uncalled for, I'd say?!
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROT
This ebuild has a security bug open for almost one year (Bug 142817),
plus lots of other bugs as well.
If you are interested, please see http://tinyurl.com/32webs
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&se
k either.
> There is a memory conflict between the X space and vesa.
> I basically think that users (As advanced Gentoo user can be) cannot
> have a workable environment in a reasonable effort... I know I have
> failed.
vesafb-tng works just perfectly fine here w/ nVidia/ATI/Intel. You are
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
> And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
Then the software won't run, very easy.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA
Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
> On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
>>> so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
>> Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
>
> the same exact thing could be said for ever
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
> so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented. It's enough that loads of games
kill non-interactivity.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.
re' link.
Could not find an appropriate hxplay or realplay in the system path to
use as an embedded player.
Click OK.
Could not find an appropriate hxplay or realplay in the system path to
use as an embedded player.
Click OK.
426 Transfer aborted. Data connection closed.
Stare on a b
ctor
??? English only, please.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ly... 8 bugs altogether, 2 enhancements, 2 stabilization, 1
LDAP-related, 2 DLZ related, 1 hardened.
http://tinyurl.com/3cwhjv
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7
;s the horrible issue with porting those, beyond 'oh we don't care,
use gnupg-1 because the legacy feeling is oh so great'?
Shrug.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primar
Thilo Bangert napsal(a):
>>> It isn't different. That's the problem. If you have two packages
>>> with the same name, you have the same problem.
>> On that note I would hope the vim/vi peeps would rename.
>> app-vim/ant
>
> and app-vim/sudo
and app-xemacs/emerge, g
--
jakub
signature.
Steve Long napsal(a):
> welp's been away ;)
Oh well, the dreaded *buntu maintenance eats time, you know... *g*
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 93
n
the ebuild in the first place.
It's been discussed with the original maintainer over and over again,
and the conclusion was that it's not safe to have two versions of expat
installed on the same system. So, why don't we just stick to that and be
done with it?
--
Best regards,
Ulrich Mueller napsal(a):
> The Emacs team has converted the following virtual packages:
>
>virtual/emacs
>virtual/flim
>
> to new-style (aka GLEP 37) virtuals.
Oh, and naming the new-style virtuals the same as the real thing kills
binpkgs. :/
--
Best regards,
May 2007).
Leaving the old-style virtuals in place leaves the new style ones
non-fuctional, so you'd better remove them right now. ;)
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key
Carsten Lohrke napsal(a):
> On Montag, 14. Mai 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Uhm, kindly leave app-arch/rar alone; that unrar-gpl thing is just a bad
>> joke.
>
> There's app-arch/unrar, so this is no point. When unrar-gpl is so broken, why
> it's in the tree?
Timothy Redaelli napsal(a):
> /me votes for remove them (and app-cdr/nero)
Uhm, kindly leave app-arch/rar alone; that unrar-gpl thing is just a bad
joke.
(No idea what does the rest of licenses belong to, would make sense to
post ebuilds names instead.)
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mai
om a crisp
one.
Once again, I don't want to use any software produced by such abusive
moron, and other people should do the same - or they should help them
themselves and compile the only original, trademarked Ion3 (C)(TM) manually.
*annoyed*
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Peter Gordon napsal(a):
> On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 00:41 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Well, one could ask why we should provide ebuild for stuff that has
>> apparently insane upstream, instead of just dropping such junk until the
>> upstream guy realizes that the world doesn't
done with that. If
> users complain, ask them to talk to Tuomo Valkonen.
>
> Cheers,
> -jkt
>
Well, one could ask why we should provide ebuild for stuff that has
apparently insane upstream, instead of just dropping such junk until the
upstream guy realizes that the world doesn't sp
Nice utility, now unfortunately a bit orphaned and with lots of open
bugs. If you are interested, see http://tinyurl.com/2mkd7s
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary
The current ebuild is outdated and there's a couple of minor issues that
are getting stale. If you are interested, see http://tinyurl.com/s8o6k
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0
>> happy users read them from there.
>
> Also already been covered. Read the thread.
Haven't noticed either, maybe you could point us to where has this been
covered?
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup
and "users like it" may be nice for one package overlay, and a
genuine PITA for a tree with thousands of ebuilds at the same time.
Repeating it doesn't go anywhere, nor will it make any of your point
more valid.
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG
more useful entry than 'many
bugfixes' or nothing at all in ChangeLog - which is not so rare at all,
unfortunately :/
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fing
emails threads clearly
suggests it's not the case ATM.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no
itical, so yeah, it's entirely irrelevant.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nstead
How much more explanation about this 'critical' change do the users
*need*? If they don't get the above, maybe paludis and Linux just isn't
for them and they should stick to Windows. Meanwhile there's no need to
establish a precedent of using critical news for PEBKA
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> On Sat, 05 May 2007 22:19:27 +0200
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
>>> On Sat, 5 May 2007 22:00:27 +0200
>>> Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> Paludis users
as a licenses file:
... Use of token '*' is deprecated, use '*/*' instead
You seriously want to claim that paludis users can't read? Again; what
exactly are you after here? (And drop the 'experience has shown', 'users
want it', 'it's non-trivia
s) read explicit runtime deprecation warnings.
Because the above is clearly stupid - what are you really after here,
may I ask? I guess amne is right here.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
n postinst/CONFIG_PROTECT.
>
> And these changes can't be handled that way, since paludis configs can
> and do exist in home directories as well as in /etc.
Shrug; frankly just a matter of adding $HOME/.paludis/etc or whatever
(example) to CONFIG_PROTECT... Why it couldn't be do
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> On Sat, 05 May 2007 15:48:28 +0200
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK, I'm afraid that GLEP42 is missing the part that critical news
>> reporting does not replace documentation. You seriously intend to use
>> this feature f
ce documentation. You seriously intend to use
this feature for such stuff and force everyone to download this via rsync?
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> On Sat, 05 May 2007 15:15:55 +0200
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How does it matter exactly whether it's paludis users, gcc users, php
>> users, apache users or whoever else who will use the news item? Let's
>>
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> On Sat, 05 May 2007 14:53:47 +0200
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For what situation? Changing * to */* is a bunch of config files (as
>> far as I've been told, paludis warns about this deprecated syntax
>> anyway)?
>&
news reporting" feature for such
trivialities, most users are going to ignore the noise pretty soon.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1
uld be fine.
See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165629,
http://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=116026024223024&w=2 etc.
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 4/29/07, William L. Thomson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 11:28 +0200, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It would be nice if there where some CD/DVD labels created, that people
> could print and put on their LiveCDs/Insta
't see what exactly are you
expecting from this whole thing. Anyway, good luck. ;)
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
The ones with the copyright problems?
>
I'm out of topic i think. Could you amplify, please?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158197
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-nfp/msg_01213.xml
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_141498.xml
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maintainers of such ebuilds to move
them to 'as soon as possible'? And why's moving them ASAP exactly
needed?
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
refrain from taking 'emergency' measures on
issues where there's no emergency whatsoever. There's been a bug open
for over two months and noone ever suggested that I'd be a case for
urgent council decision.
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
s are often testing in chroots or test boxes with just the
bare-bones system installed.
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
time. And I've said that if any
maintainer has issues w/ re-assigning the keywording stuff to arches,
they are welcome to contact me and we'll sort it out. (Oh, and not
exactly my fault that you got angry because alpha has gone ahead of
mips in the slacker stats on these re-assignments, which
tly make future cooperation any easier imo.
Maybe just read above? What kind of co-operation are you expecting wrt
developers who have repeatedly shown that they can't plain be bothered
with fixing their junk, because they are just way too cool to deal
with some useless idiots, such as bug wran
t to Gentoo as you've been so far. ;)
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38368
Best regards,
--
Jakub Moc
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 4/17/07, Bryan Østergaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 06:01:46AM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
>
> Whoever is in charge, kindly change my bugzilla account to the email
> address this mail is sent from and take care of the setting the
> bugzilla privs ac
his mail. I'm pretty sure you wouldn't
appreciate to be thanked in this context, and that's a good thing.
So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish!
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82772
[2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143519
[3] http://cia.vc/stats/author/p
hap=3#doc_chap4
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jan Kundrát napsal(a):
> Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Even such change would piss off users. Having *no* way to turn off
>> tests, uuuhhh please retire me *before* someone implements this, I'm not
>> going to waste my time on totally pointless bugs filed by furious u
turn them off in make.conf.
Even such change would piss off users. Having *no* way to turn off
tests, uuuhhh please retire me *before* someone implements this, I'm not
going to waste my time on totally pointless bugs filed by furious users.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Gianelloni napsal(a):
> On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 20:40 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Thilo Bangert napsal(a):
>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156814
>> Yeah. It's restricted to developers only, though, so not much useful for
>> users. :)
>
> Yea
Thilo Bangert napsal(a):
> this seems to come up more often than you like. is this the release
> tracker bug?
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156814
>
> kind regards
> Thilo
Yeah. It's restricted to developers only, though, so not much useful for
users. :)
--
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:20:46 +0200
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
>>> If someone can provide a good reason for changing to a system that's
>>> more work, I'll change. If there isn'
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> If someone can provide a good reason for changing to a system that's
> more work, I'll change. If there isn't a good reason, I won't.
Maybe if you actually read the council log, you'd see the reason? yeah,
it's indeed there, believe
elopers is when something's broken
> anyway, and that's far better than ending up with a broken install.
Well of course it's the users who will see it, see above. It's not like
that we would have 100 volunteers around to drop everything they have in
their hands a go spend days on
rs, because it's plain pointless.
If the Makefiles suck, file bugs upstream instead of dumping the stuff
on Gentoo users. People are already pretty much overloaded by the tons
of various QA checks all over the place...
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
uddenly bloat all of our src_install functions for no
> gain at all ... sounds like a no brainer to me
+1, this is a horrible idea that would just cause loads of bugs
impossible to check for in advance, major work for lots of people and
major bloat for no good reason. Bleh. :/
--
Best regards,
hat bug list?
All bugs: http://tinyurl.com/2q87ho
Open bugs only: http://tinyurl.com/2tm9mw
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8
Bryan Østergaard napsal(a):
> Nobody is forcing anybody to use in-kernel drivers.
Uhm... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172490
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Prim
Daniel Drake napsal(a):
> Jakub Moc wrote:
>> - The in-kernel drivers seriously are not an equivalent alternative, let
>> alone the preferred one, for stuff like hda-intel or any similar drivers
>> that are under permanent heavy development, at least for now.
>
> If hda
7;d be very happy to see the whole 2.4
kernel branch declared as unsupported on Gentoo - noone's really testing
anything against those kernels these days and the bugs are lingering
there for ages as noone cares; even the 2.4 kernels we still have in the
tree are pretty much unmaintained).
--
are basically different branches, and it's *not* about whether
the code is newer or older in one or the other at all.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D
[snip]
Err, where the heck has gone the GuideXML editor project that was part
of last SoC?
(And yeah, I've heard from quite a couple of people that they are not
touching any docs because the GuideXML thing is something they'd rather
avoid like plague).
--
Best regards,
Jakub M
#x27;s already pretty overdue. It's
caused hundreds and hundreds of pointless bugs about 'missing'
dependencies and it's still breaking users. I could care less about
fox-1.2.6-r2, having this darned virtual unmasked breaks lots more
things than fox. There's no need
es for bugs that are still open as
well, this implies that people either don't search at all or don't know
how to search efficiently; so I'm not too enthusiastic that changing the
default search would significantly reduce the number of dupes... )
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Oh, so resolving 'INVALID' a bug for people that report crap like 'oh,
>> my sci-mathematics/*' thingy got horribly broken with -ffast-math'
>> causes an offense to them? Well
horribly broken with -ffast-math'
causes an offense to them? Well, that's a good thing, maybe they'll
actually use their brain next time.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D
Kevin F. Quinn napsal(a):
[snip]
See, I don't really care how the reporter feels, if something's not a
bug, then it's not a bug. Don't invent confusing 'politically correct'
junk for this just because someone might feel 'offended'.
Thanks.
--
Best regar
VALID". NOCHANGE would indicate that whatever
> the original issue, no change is needed on our part to resolve the
> issue.
>
> Any reasons why this would be a bad idea?
>
NOCHANGE sucks... If you really insist on doing anything, then use NOTABUG.
--
Best regards,
Jakub
Jeff Rollin napsal(a):
> On 18/03/07, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It wouldn't become any more or less cluttered than ~/ now...
> Which is why I was saying there was no point in a ~/.config directory...
I guess you are missing the point? Fire up Midnight Comman
RY cluttered!
>> Nothing prevents from making appdirs in .config too.
>>
> True, but then .config would just become cluttered with .appdirs instead!
It wouldn't become any more or less cluttered than ~/ now...
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signa
ded, just should be restricted to sane combos.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still
hed release. So _alpha is the closest one to current netbeans 6.0
> life cycle phase, though not accurate.
Actually stuff like cat/pkg-1.2_alpha3_pre4 is valid now and honored by
portage; dunno how does that fit the netbeans upstream scheme, though.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMA
Stephen Becker napsal(a):
> On 3/15/07, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yeah indeed, lets get the facts straight and let's see who did behave
>> like an asshole:
>>
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=110676&action=view
>
> Indeed b
>
> Sometimes people need to be bluntly told to stop screwing up.
Indeed, so eroyf was told to stop screwing up, he just didn't get it
(apparently neither did you, for that matter). And don't start this
'mips needs more babysitting' nonsense here again, please.
--
Be
e promoting ricing on Sunrise project.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
flooding my mailbox with such junk, *NOW*. Move
this gay debate to /dev/null or create yourself a gentoo-chat mailing
list, but stop polluting a development ML with this noise already.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup
Bryan Østergaard napsal(a):
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:46:47AM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> And you come here to tell us that people shouldn't get confused by these
>> 'very few' retirements, that the sun in still shining nicely and we are
>> recruiting people a
cruiting people as always? And that you will continue silently
watching the trolls team associated around mips and ciaranm call people
fuckheads, idiots and making a gutter of something that's supposed to be
a development mailing list?
Ugh... well done.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EM
] http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/docs/flame.html
> Ciaranm never left, but was forced out by idiots
Well done, nice insult of lots of people. Really helpful.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCE
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:08:40 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Erm, to be precise here, noone has removed any ciaranm's attributions
>> from devmanual, they've all been moved to the end of the document
>> originally,
And of course this was a great occasion to start screaming about license
violation and demand bigger fonts on devmanual frontpage. [1]
As said, grow up.
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150231#c5
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subk
the
'valuable input' provided so kindly here by ciaranm, which is so
valuable that it has cost us two developers in two days.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fin
x the manifests.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Danny van Dyk napsal(a):
> What about making custom-cflags default in the base profile?
Uhm? Maybe re-read the description of the flags? It's unsupported and
breaks stuff, that's why the use flag exists...
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG sig
Mohammed Hagag napsal(a):
> amarok-1.4.5 doesn't install any thing except the .po files when
> emerging without the kde USE flag, is this normal ?
No, it's not normal, and no, this is not a proper place. We have
bugzilla for such things (see Bug 167536).
--
Best regards,
J
version x.y.z stabilized
first. Sorry, enough babysitting here, either devs can read or they
shouldn't have commit access.
Period.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Primary key fingerprin
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:33:59 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | So, what are you blaming me for here? Grrr.
>
> Misassigning or premature filing, as you prefer.
Oh sure... Next time, blame me for Sept 11, keep amusing us by your
bu
Alexander Færøy napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 07:50:02PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Eh? Why should I stop filing bugs about stale vulnerable cruft? Should
>> it stay in the tree forever (unless some $we_all_know_which_arch dev
>> wakes up by miracle a
you tell them to do that stuff gets broken
> on a regular basis.
Oh, there's nothing like attacking someone for someone else's fault.
Won't waste my time on your trollish rants any more.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG signature:
http://subkeys.
1 - 100 of 431 matches
Mail list logo
