Damian Szeluga wrote:
> I'm using UTF-8 encoding in my system. The main problem is, that lots
> of /usr/share/man/* and /usr/share/doc/* files are iso8859-2 encoded (as my
> LINGUAS is set to pl). I think, that Portage itself should recode all the
> files, which go to /usr/share/man/ and /usr/share
Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote:
> Something interresting has happend since last, the new bugday site has
> gone into official beta, and can been seen on
> http://bugday.gentoo.org/bugdaytest . Please do some testing with it,
> and report any bugs you find back to me.
Bug #1:
Do *NOT* ask for Bugzil
Thomas Cort wrote:
>> Thoughts on ideas on this somewhat more focussed idea? ( or at least I
>> think it's more focused :P )
>
> Will there be restrictions on what can go into these overlays? There
> are some ebuilds that aren't allowed in the main portage tree. One
> example is winex-cvs (see
> a
Alexander Simonov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:24:26AM +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
>> Well there are a few problems, but yes I cannot name them now.
>> Using Japanese, Cyrillic and English in a few encodings each is a big
>> nightmare.
>>
>
> It'
Hi all,
I finally get to test the new 2006.0 LiveCD and the new installer (GUI
version). It certainly has many kinks to be ironed out, but it is a
great new start!
I am now waiting for the install on a vmware-workstation-5.5 while
reading what Google had to say about "VMWare Gentoo"...
A few qui
Lars Weiler wrote:
> * Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/02/28 11:58 +0100]:
>> Enabling the unicode useflag in the profiles should help our
>> international users and should not cause any problems. Are there any
>> known bugs / problems this would trigger? Any reasons against that?
>
> It is
Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
> Jeffrey Forman wrote:
>> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 22:54 -0500, Andrew Muraco wrote:
>>> I second that there is a massive confusion of naming, and this needs to
>>> get sorted out (or atleast explained) Because I'm sure the mirrors will
>
Tuan Van wrote:
> Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
>> yes, I figured out that x86-installcd-2006.0 is the "Gentoo 2006.0
>> Minimal install CD" for x86 or is it... will any n00b figure it out?
>>
>>
> If a n00b can't figure it out, I would suggest h
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 22:54 -0500, Andrew Muraco wrote:
>> I second that there is a massive confusion of naming, and this needs to
>> get sorted out (or atleast explained) Because I'm sure the mirrors will
>> start getting slamed with people downloading 2006.0. Lets not wa
Contgrats to the release team :-)
But let me whine a bit, even a few KB:
I just saw the GWN and the news about 2006.0 ...
So reading at the release notes:
> This is also the first release with the Gentoo Linux Installer
> officially debuting on the x86 LiveCD, which will fully replace the
> Un
Hi all.
During the last many months, more than once an idea occured in my mind, so I
decided to share it.
2006-01-25T01:34 kalin $ dd if=/dev/brain of=gentoo-dev bs=1 count=3292
Do you think it will be good to have something like a snapshot of the
installed packages?
Something that will help wh
Renat Lumpau wrote:
> I just committed our new documentation [1] for webapp.eclass. We hope that it
> will help devs and users write and maintain ebuilds for web applications.
> Comments and patches are welcome.
>
> We also have a brand new project page [2], courtesy of wrobel.
>
> [1] http://www
Philipp Riegger wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2006, at 8:05 PM, Philippe Trottier wrote:
>
>> Recipe for disaster, specially in a place like mine where sparc,
>> alpha, x86_64
>> and ppc32/64 mix... not counting ia64 for a test run soon...
>>
>> If you really want to do this, someone has to make a rendezvou
Alexandre Buisse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for all of you who have been using latex on gentoo, here are some news
> on what is currently happening.
A news is a good news, glad that there is something happening.
> First of all, we have a new tetex (tetex-3.0_p1). It should have hit the
> mirrors this morni
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> as one of the new sane features of the next portage-2.1_pre release, we're
> looking to cut out use.defaults support
>
> existing stable users wont be affected as the 2.0.x versions will continue to
> carry support for this, but some of you stable users may notice some US
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 19:53 +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
>
>>>Make this distributed tool for tar zip bzip2 and gzip and I'm in, I
>>>don't think it would be useful with anything else than Gigabit Ethernet.
>
> One 2Ghz CPU can'
Philippe Trottier wrote:
> Lisa Seelye wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 00:18 +, Ferris McCormick wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Lisa Seelye wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 14:51 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
Francesco Riosa wrote:
>> Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
>>
[...]
>> "{{{ A hypothetical example:
>>
>> I used mysql-4.1.16-r30 and I have a locally encoded (say Shift_JIS)
>> database. I have DBD-mysql compiled against that and a package FOO using
>> th
Andrea Barisani wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:55 +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
>>
>>>Regarding the inclusion of ca-certificates as a PDEPEND (yeah a brief
>>>exchange of emails already happened on -dev but since it's not so easy to
>>>
Francesco Riosa wrote:
> Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
> [...]
>
>>>An eselect-mysql module has been prepared to create simlinks for the
>>>desired version of mysql making easy to switch between them (hopefully)
>>>
>>>The libraries (libmysqlclient &a
Francesco Riosa wrote:
> Background, to make life easyer for people that use more versions of
> mysql (and just for fun) MySQL is going to be slotted.
>
> Currently the slot enabled versions are mysql-4.1.16-r30
> mysql-5.0.18-r30 mysql-5.1.4_alpha-r30, in short those with "-r30".
>
> The few pat
Luca Barbato wrote:
> I'm thinking about adding the srvdir[1] global useflag.
>
> Scream if I miss some discussion preventing it.
>
> (fenice[2] will use it, that's why I'm adding it)
>
> lu
>
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0020.html#implementation
> [2] http://packages.gentoo.or
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 11:05 -0500, Rajiv Aaron Manglani wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
>>
>>
>>> So what about the first problem? Working, real configs for gentoo releases?
>>> I am thinking
>>&
Some time ago I sent a mail with the above subject and there was no response...
Now I saw it went to
the gentoo-server ML :-( /me bad
So, resending some thoughts about catalyst here...
So far I have played with catalyst, lately catalyst2, since gentoo-1.4 was
released. AFAIR, 3 or 4
times. More
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 05:30:01AM +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>>If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
>>vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
>>Gentoo dev list to see.
>
>
> I would like GLEP 45 [1] - GLEP
Lares Moreau wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 10:34 +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
>
>> what about defining something like
>> GENTOO_LEVEL="n00b|user|know_how|master|admin|dev|guru" in
>> make.conf? And act acording to this, but trying to move the user up a le
Lares Moreau wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 22:10 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
>
>>>I see the point about not showing all the QA stuff to the 'regluar'
>>>user. Maybe only show this info on screen with --verbose set. As for
>>>the QA-warnings file, how does this differ from parsing the files in
>>>
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> On 19/12/05, Peter Johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Or maybe not, I dunno. The point being I don't think we should immediately
>>write off
>>any of the distributed SCMs without pondering how they might make a
>>difference or be usable.
>
>
> It would be very u
28 matches
Mail list logo
