On 14/05/07, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Perhaps atom, an uncharged single ion. =)
the words uncharged ion dont belong together as an ion by definition
carries a charge :p
Heh how about FreeRadical then; don't they carry a charge?
Other than tho, the guy is a
On 13/05/07, Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ulrich Mueller napsal(a):
Maybe the following are also interesting in this context:
Debian:
http://womble.decadent.org.uk/blog/renaming-of-ion3
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?p=69522
Archlinux:
Count me in.
Recently I've been having fun knocking up kernel modules at work so I
understand the build system reasonably well. Happy to help wherever.
Cheers
Rob
On 30/04/07, bret curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel,
I would love to be more involved in kernel details. I've been in
On 19/04/07, Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect by
default would do a lot more good at this stage than test.
Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing
On 20/04/07, Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob C wrote:
On 19/04/07, *Christian Faulhammer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=collision-detect
On 17/04/07, Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
I'm therefore resigning from this project.
I'm pretty sure it will be actually no loss for Gentoo, since
On 12/04/07, Jonathan Adamczewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Walter wrote:
I can understand traceroute being setuid, but why put it in /usr/sbin
so only root sees it?
Huh? Just add /usr/sbin to your PATH.
$ export PATH=$PATH:/usr/sbin
$ traceroute
Version 1.4a12
Usage: traceroute
On 21/03/07, Ioannis Aslanidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome! I hope that you will have a good time!
On 3/21/07, Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Anant Narayanan (also known as
anant or
KillerX) our latest addition to the PHP herd.
Anant is
On 19/03/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 19 March 2007, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 03:38 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
what is the problem as you see it ? the nice thing about having a
~/.config/ is that it's a directory that can obviously be added
On 14/03/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:30:37 +0100 Alexandre Buisse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I quite agree with the Patriot act comparison, and I would be
interested to know what you think our real problems are.
Not a
On 13/03/07, Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiya all,
As some of you are already aware, I was at the last Council meeting
given a Task. This Task was to draft a proposed Code of Conduct for
Gentoo, and a scheme for enforcing it. The current version of this
proposal can be found
On 06/03/07, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear list,
Why not simply naming the formal logic rules for the official venue
where developers (and ex-developers and users) can talk out their
disagreements to be:
1. Anyone who is impolite get's kicked off.
2.
Hey all,
My blog entry is here : http://www.brokenpipe.co.uk/blog/?p=42
Thanks!
-Rob
On 26/02/07, Rob C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
Some evil person broke my laptop screen at FOSDEM.
My laptop is really important to me, its where I do all of my dev work and
its also my main way
So do I :-)
Cheers
-Rob
On 26/02/07, Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some evil person broke my laptop screen at FOSDEM.
What about the FOSDEM insurance?
Hope you get needed cash and fix it fast.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
--
/**
For what its worth, I think option #2 is the best.
I think option #1 is out of the question and I think that #3 is flawed
because the 8th spot developer's situation or commitment to the project may
have changed since the last vote and in any case that developer would be
free to partake in the
I'm sorry I dont have a test box for this but is it not needed for people
maintaining 2.4 systems?
On 24/01/07, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
net-misc/e100 removal request
Bug 159648
- hasn't been updated for ages, maintainer is completely MIA
- uses check_KV instead of proper
16 matches
Mail list logo
