On 3/11/17 3:13 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> All lines containing +knots should say knots instead.
>
Done.
I'm getting increasingly unsatisfied with where bitcoins* is going. I
think I'd like to take full ownership of it and remove all unnecessary
patches. If there's anyone that wants to co-ma
Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> >> I proxy maintain bitcoins for luke-jr. He wants to propose a patch
> >> against the bitcoin eclass. The following is his proposed change.
> >> I'll commit it after review.
> >
> > Please do not do that, Anthony.
>
> I don't have time nor the familiarity to properly
> I don't have time nor the familiarity to properly maintain bitcoins
> myself. Every time Luke wants to make a change, I get nothing but
> negative advice - what not to do, but not what to do. If there were an
> unpopular package I would just drop it to maintainer-needed. But do we
> really wan
On 3/7/17 12:18 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> I proxy maintain bitcoins for luke-jr. He wants to propose a patch
>> against the bitcoin eclass. The following is his proposed change.
>> I'll commit it after review.
>
> Please do not do that, Anthony.
>
I don't have time n
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Matthias Maier wrote:
>
>> The kernel doesn't give you a choice of multiple independent patch
>> sets. We have just a few options that bundle many patches. You can't
>> selectively turn them on and off.
>>
>> I'm not asking whether patching bitcoin is good or bad.
> The kernel doesn't give you a choice of multiple independent patch
> sets. We have just a few options that bundle many patches. You can't
> selectively turn them on and off.
>
> I'm not asking whether patching bitcoin is good or bad.
>
> I'm pointing out that if you want to do the same thing w
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Matthias Maier wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017, at 10:52 CST, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>>> As a Bitcoin user I personally don't feel too happy with my experience
>>> changing without me changing USE-flags. I'm not against changing the name of
>>> the USE-flag, just a
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017, at 10:52 CST, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> As a Bitcoin user I personally don't feel too happy with my experience
>> changing without me changing USE-flags. I'm not against changing the name of
>> the USE-flag, just against changing the default behavior and applying a
>> bunch of
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Mathy Vanvoorden wrote:
>
> 2017-03-06 15:53 GMT+01:00 Anthony G. Basile :
>>
>> Bitcoin Knots includes a number of enhancements users may find useful. I
>> think it would be a good idea to make it the default for Bitcoin
>> ebuilds (net-p2p/bitcoin-qt, net-p2p/bit
Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> I proxy maintain bitcoins for luke-jr. He wants to propose a patch
> against the bitcoin eclass. The following is his proposed change.
> I'll commit it after review.
Please do not do that, Anthony.
> Bitcoin Knots includes a number of enhancements users may find usef
2017-03-06 15:53 GMT+01:00 Anthony G. Basile :
> Bitcoin Knots includes a number of enhancements users may find useful. I
> think it would be a good idea to make it the default for Bitcoin
> ebuilds (net-p2p/bitcoin-qt, net-p2p/bitcoind, and dev-util/bitcoin-tx).
>
As a Bitcoin user I personally
Hi everyone,
I proxy maintain bitcoins for luke-jr. He wants to propose a patch
against the bitcoin eclass. The following is his proposed change. I'll
commit it after review.
--Tony
Bitcoin Knots includes a number of enhancements users may find useful. I
think it would be a good idea to mak
12 matches
Mail list logo
