On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 04-04-2009 20:41:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The two aren't mutually contradictory. Quite the contrary.
For EAPI 3, we're aiming to make it illegal to do anything with a flag
unless it's either explicitly listed
However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
don't really like this idea because it exposes the use flag and we
don't want it exposed to the users.
If you don't want it exposed to users, then use
On 04-04-2009 13:23:24 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
don't really like this idea because it exposes the use flag and we
don't want it exposed to the
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 04-04-2009 13:23:24 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
don't really like this idea because it exposes the use flag and we
don't want it
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use
that can be hidden.
It is not.
But can be added.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 04-04-2009 14:54:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use
that can be hidden.
It is not.
But can be added.
I think we talk about different things
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 04-04-2009 14:54:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use
that can be hidden.
It is not.
But can be added.
I think we talk about
Le 03/04/2009 16:47, Jeremy Olexa a écrit :
However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
don't really like this idea because it exposes the use flag and we
don't want it exposed to the users.
Just of
On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use
that can be hidden.
It is not.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
On 04-04-2009 15:21:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
You can set USERLAND=GNU PREFIX
Prefix is not a userland, please understand that.
It's like pizza not being an elibc, or beer not being a kernel.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
On 04-04-2009 14:22:09 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
Le 03/04/2009 16:47, Jeremy Olexa a écrit :
However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
don't really like this idea because it exposes the use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
So, my recommendation is to:
1) mask the prefix USE flag in base/use.mask because no one except the
prefix profiles should use this flag.
2) unmask and force the USE flag in prefix profile.
3) add entry to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:20:09 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
Actually, after further inspection of PMS, it seems that the
IUSE_IMPLICIT is more appropriate for the 'prefix' flag since it
doesn't seem to fit into the USE_EXPAND paradigm.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 04-04-2009 15:21:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
You can set USERLAND=GNU PREFIX
Prefix is not a userland, please understand that.
It's like pizza not being an elibc, or beer not being a kernel.
Sure
Zac Medico wrote:
Petteri Räty wrote:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 04-04-2009 15:21:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
You can set USERLAND=GNU PREFIX
Prefix is not a userland, please understand that.
It's like pizza not being an elibc, or beer not being a kernel.
Sure it's not a user land like GNU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:20:09 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
Actually, after further inspection of PMS, it seems that the
IUSE_IMPLICIT is more appropriate for the 'prefix' flag since it
doesn't seem to fit into
On 04-04-2009 20:41:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The two aren't mutually contradictory. Quite the contrary.
For EAPI 3, we're aiming to make it illegal to do anything with a flag
unless it's either explicitly listed in IUSE or handled via a number of
special magic profile variables, so
Hello all,
In the Gentoo Prefix project we have a special USE flag: 'prefix',
kind of like $ARCH USE flags. I am writing here to ask of the best way
to introduce a global implicit USE flag to gentoo-x86. There has been
some interest from other devs to kill diffs in ebuilds between
gentoo-x86 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
So, my recommendation is to:
1) mask the prefix USE flag in base/use.mask because no one except the
prefix profiles should use this flag.
2) unmask and force the USE flag in prefix profile.
3) add entry to use.desc.
addendum)
19 matches
Mail list logo
