On 5/23/05, Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a snipsnipsnipsnipsnip
But in any case, the functionality contained in wpa_supplicant covers
my arguments, and I apologise for not being aware of it.
Stroller
Since you were the only person that is not a gentoo dev to post on
this topic, I
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 09:25 +0100, Stroller wrote:
What's the difference between wpa_supplicant wireless-tools, then?
Both do the same job - provide the tools to configure your wireless
card.
wpa_supplicant is a daemon that runs in the background and when it
associates with an AP in your list
On May 23, 2005, at 11:04 am, Roy Marples wrote:
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 09:25 +0100, Stroller wrote:
What's the difference between wpa_supplicant wireless-tools, then?
Both do the same job - provide the tools to configure your wireless
card.
wpa_supplicant is a daemon that runs in the
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 05:06 +0100, Stroller wrote:
- as I understand it: wireless-tools to actually configure the SSID,
WEP key
wpa_supplicant can do this as well which makes wireless-tools optional
Roy
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On May 21, 2005, at 6:25 am, Doug Goldstein wrote:
Stroller wrote:
Hi,
. far to long.
Yeah, sorry... I've always been pedantic. It's a real hard habit to
shift.
In summary and simple conclusion, yes you are wrong. So that makes 2
out
of the 4 or 5 active Mobile
On May 21, 2005, at 8:47 am, Roy Marples wrote:
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 05:06 +0100, Stroller wrote:
- as I understand it: wireless-tools to actually configure the SSID,
WEP key
wpa_supplicant can do this as well which makes wireless-tools optional
Ah, expletive! Please excuse my last
Stroller wrote:
Hi,
. far to long.
Stroller.
In summary and simple conclusion, yes you are wrong. So that makes 2 out
of the 4 or 5 active Mobile herd devs who say you're wrong. brix is 100%
correct. Let me give you an explaination
The firmware itself does
