On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 07:22:42PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
> Personally I'd just kill auto-use support in the next "big" portage
> upgrade (and USE_ORDER with it as disabling auto-use is the only
> real application of it that I'm aware of).
works for me
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing l
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 00:06:38 +0100
Thomas de Grenier de Latour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 23:23:19 +0100
> "Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 11:55 -0800, Michael Marineau wrote:
> >
> > > For users who do like the functionality jus
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 23:23:19 +0100
"Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 11:55 -0800, Michael Marineau wrote:
>
> > For users who do like the functionality just properly document
> > the existance of USE_ORDER in the install guide.
>
> However, I'd -also- want
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 11:55 -0800, Michael Marineau wrote:
> However changing this will also lead to many supprises and tick off many
> users who don't know why a bunch of flags just vanished. How about we
> leave the feature in portage but remove auto from USE_ORDER in the
> 2006.0 profile and pu
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:18:58AM -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
>
>>Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Well, I don't think so... If I want to enable a feature for one
>>>specific ebuild and a USE flag in /etc/portage/package.use pulls in a
>>>dep, that in turn enables t
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:18:58AM -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, I don't think so... If I want to enable a feature for one
> > specific ebuild and a USE flag in /etc/portage/package.use pulls in a
> > dep, that in turn enables that use flag globally, it's
Drake Wyrm wrote:
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I don't think so... If I want to enable a feature for one
specific ebuild and a USE flag in /etc/portage/package.use pulls in a
dep, that in turn enables that use flag globally, it's obviously not
what I intended and forces me to add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
18.11.2005, 20:18:58, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, I don't think so... If I want to enable a feature for one
>> specific ebuild and a USE flag in /etc/portage/package.use pulls in a
>> dep, that in turn enables th
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:45:25 + Kurt Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| We've been using the USE="-* foo bar" method on all of our
| infrastructure servers since as far back as I can remember and have
| never had a problem as a result.
|
| Not trying to fan the flames one way or the other -- j
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 07:31:30PM + or thereabouts, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | Put USE="-* oneuse twouse reduse blueuse" in make.conf to set the
> | globals, and _then_ start tweaking in "package.use".
>
> ...and then watch your system explode because you didn't set various
> USE flags which
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:18:58 -0800 Drake Wyrm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Well, I don't think so... If I want to enable a feature for one
| > specific ebuild and a USE flag in /etc/portage/package.use pulls in
| > a dep, that in turn enables that use flag g
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I don't think so... If I want to enable a feature for one
> specific ebuild and a USE flag in /etc/portage/package.use pulls in a
> dep, that in turn enables that use flag globally, it's obviously not
> what I intended and forces me to add yet another -f
18.11.2005, 16:43:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i see no reason to keep use.defaults around anymore, i think the rest of our
> config/profile system covers for it adequately and in a manner that doesnt
> confused people
Also, IIRC, saner alternatives have been suggested, like IUSE="+bleh" to enabl
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:33:08PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> would someone more competent explain to me, why
you approached this all wrong ... you were supposed to say something
like "can we get rid of this hidden feature please"
i see no reason to keep use.defaults around anymore, i think the re
14 matches
Mail list logo
