Published a slightly improved version now:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gentoo-news.git/tree/2015/2015-04-06-apache-addhandler-addtype
If there's anything wrong with it, please mail me directly (or put me in
CC) so there is zero chance of slipping through. Thanks!
Best,
Sebastian
Our bug queue has 81 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
Thanks!
Daniel Campbell posted on Sat, 04 Apr 2015 22:58:40 -0700 as excerpted:
Aside from the Devmanual, most of Gentoo's docs are on the wiki, so you
could make a bookmark and setup a search shortcut for it. Just bookmark
the following address in Firefox:
Dnia 2015-04-05, o godz. 10:57:57
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 04/05/2015 12:59 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
It seems that the code initially supported fetching without size
'digest' but it got broken over time. Add proper conditionals to avoid
ugly failures in this case.
If
The ro_checker code added in commit
47ef9a0969474f963dc8e52bfbbb8bc075e8d73c incorrectly asserts that the
parent directories of EPREFIX be writable. Fix it to skip the parents,
since they are irrelevant. This does not affect the case where EPREFIX
is empty, since all directories are checked in
On Sun, 5 Apr 2015 21:28:07 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
The ro_checker code added in commit
47ef9a0969474f963dc8e52bfbbb8bc075e8d73c incorrectly asserts that the
parent directories of EPREFIX be writable. Fix it to skip the parents,
since they are irrelevant. This does not
On Sun, 5 Apr 2015 21:47:12 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
From: Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
It seems that the code initially supported fetching without size
'digest' but it got broken over time. Add proper conditionals to avoid
ugly failures in this case.
Signed-off-by:
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2015-04-05 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
media-plugins/vdr-pcd 2015-03-30 13:33:19
hd_brummy
app-admin/eselect-audicle 2015-03-31
Sebastian Pipping posted on Mon, 06 Apr 2015 01:29:19 +0200 as excerpted:
Published a slightly improved version now:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/gentoo-news.git/tree/2015/2015-04-06-
apache-addhandler-addtype
If there's anything wrong with it, please mail me directly (or put me in
CC)
Alec Warner posted on Sun, 05 Apr 2015 09:33:24 -0700 as excerpted:
No need to shout.
Apology to you and others. And thanks.
While I am of course familiar with CAPS=shout, I always considered it
entire phrases or whole sentences in caps, not single words, which was
simply emphasis.
But it
# Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gentoo.org (06 Apr 2015)
# Does not link against latest ncurses and no interest to fix it.
# Superseded by LVM2 and all clusters should be migrated by now.
# Removal in 30 days.
sys-fs/evms
I kept it in tree for a while longer for volumes migration purpose, but all
On Sat, 4 Apr 2015 23:31:25 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
The old http uri redirects to the new https uri, so use the new https
uri directly.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 469888
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469888
---
bin/repoman | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
On Sun, 5 Apr 2015 04:12:17 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Thomas D. posted on Sat, 04 Apr 2015 22:09:36 +0200 as excerpted:
Title: New net-firewall/shorewall all-in-one package
But I'm not wedded to either idea; they're just what I came up with
off the top of my head.
On 04/05/2015 01:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
If you're going to fork a library, and don't intend to keep the
packages API-compatible, then change the filenames. What is so hard
about this? LIbressl was even an outside fork, so it didn't come with
any of the baggage of we're the real libssl
On 5 April 2015 at 05:44, Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote:
I guess I'll just let this simmer for now and see how things develop. My
preference (I think, at least at the moment) would be for both
implementations to be able to coexist, like openssl and gnutls. It looks
like that's the way
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
Since as you point out the two packages are vastly API compatible, it makes
them ABI incompatible and conflicting.
++
If they really want to improve the security of function calls that
they consider inherently
On Sat, 4 Apr 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-04-04, o godz. 21:36:37
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
But in the worst case, your hack can cause a broken dependency
graph. On the one hand, above mentioned =app-misc/foo-1:0 matches
all versions affected by the slotmove, so it
# James Le Cuirot ch...@gentoo.org (05 Apr 2015)
# A 32-on-64 Java VM is no longer considered necessary and a multilib
# icedtea-bin would be preferred anyway. sun-j2me-bin depends on this
# but it has been superseded by Oracle's JME and I doubt we'll ever
# need that either. Removal in 30 days.
It seems that the code initially supported fetching without size
'digest' but it got broken over time. Add proper conditionals to avoid
ugly failures in this case.
---
pym/portage/checksum.py | 2 +-
pym/portage/package/ebuild/fetch.py | 7 ---
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4
The squashdelta module provides syncing via SquashFS snapshots. For the
initial sync, a complete snapshot is fetched and placed in
/var/cache/portage/squashfs. On subsequent sync operations, deltas are
fetched from the mirror and used to reconstruct the newest snapshot.
The distfile fetching
On 04/05/2015 06:44 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 01:31:53PM +0200, hasufell wrote:
Not anymore. We will go for libressl USE flag for the same reason
there is a libav USE flag now (working subslots etc).
Um, ok. That still only allows one or the other to be installed
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote:
They're pretty much decided on allowing both openssl and libressl to be
installed concurrently and for a given application to use one or the
other. The specific method for that packaging system is what they call a
prefix;
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 08:49:51PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-04-04, o godz. 13:47:47
Alex Brandt alund...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Saturday, April 04, 2015 14:41:37 Philip Webb wrote:
I read the recent thread re the new app-eselect.
Doing my weekly system update,
it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
My preferred solution would be
create a revbump that solely amends (R)DEPEND, leaving the KEYWORDS
exactly as they are.
Sounds good to me (as long as repoman agrees :).
- --
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Dnia 2015-04-05, o godz. 19:32:01
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sun, 5 Apr 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
This is quite a Portage patch topic but since devs are known to be
unhappy about any change, I would like to start a bikeshed first.
The idea is to make repoman/pcheck
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
What are your thoughts?
Sounds useful to me!
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 2:35 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
You are ranting at the wrong place. If you want to make a difference,
take this to the openbsd mailing lists.
It seems unlikely that this would make much of a difference. I think
that allowing this package to create another
On 04/05/2015 03:25 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
Since as you point out the two packages are vastly API compatible, it makes
them ABI incompatible and conflicting.
++
If they really want to improve the security
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Martin Vaeth mar...@mvath.de wrote:
One suggestion around this problem would be to use different
directories for these two types of use-flags, say
package.use and package.use.needed.
I still think we need a better long-term solution, but the workaround
is
Hello all,
Firstly, I would like to take this opportunity to remind all devs
touching ebuilds with Java .jar dependencies about the importance of
restricting these dependencies to specific SLOTs.
There is no cross-platform or even platform-specific location for
Java .jar files so each distro
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
TL;DR: (1) Please consider either making Documentation a top-level-menu
link (preferable), or at least change Support to Support and
Documentation. (2) On the documentation lander page, add a one big
list link to a
Hi,
This is quite a Portage patch topic but since devs are known to be
unhappy about any change, I would like to start a bikeshed first.
The idea is to make repoman/pcheck complain if the newest ebuild
matched by version+slot restriction of dependency atom can't satisfy
the USE dependency, or in
On Sun, 5 Apr 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
This is quite a Portage patch topic but since devs are known to be
unhappy about any change, I would like to start a bikeshed first.
The idea is to make repoman/pcheck complain if the newest ebuild
matched by version+slot restriction of dependency
On 04/05/2015 12:59 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
It seems that the code initially supported fetching without size
'digest' but it got broken over time. Add proper conditionals to avoid
ugly failures in this case.
If we're handling this case, then we should probably not assume that the
dict contains
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 04/02/2015 09:32 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Out of curiosity, what is keeping us from having USE flag dependencies
handled dynamically, in the same way that package dependencies are?
It's already able to adjust USE automatically via autounmask support.
On Sun, 5 Apr 2015 18:50:10 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
What are your thoughts?
if the version+slot restriction on foo in bar-1.ebuild contains foo
packages that don't have bar useflag then it's an error in
bar-1.ebuild (I think pms is pretty clear about this)
Alexis.
On 5 April 2015 at 19:59, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
It seems unlikely that this would make much of a difference. I think
that allowing this package to create another ffmpeg vs libav mess is a
mistake.
To be honest, the upstream developers should be fairly in the known
regarding my
On 04/05/2015 08:59 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 2:35 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
You are ranting at the wrong place. If you want to make a difference,
take this to the openbsd mailing lists.
It seems unlikely that this would make much of a difference.
It
38 matches
Mail list logo
