Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10.10.2015 16:15, hasufell wrote: > On 10/10/2015 03:54 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: >> >> Dear Julian, >> >> avoiding this mailing list for further reviews is great news. >> Still, I'd like to opt-out from receiving any mails arising from project >> "Reviewers". >> If there are QA-related issues

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Team leader(s) election meeting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:24:20 +0200 Alexander Berntsen wrote: >> On 01/10/15 16:19, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > Now for my re-election platform / campaign speech ;) > Mine is far more modest: > -improving the UI & fixing UI bugs, >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

On 10/10/2015 05:34 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > It is no secret that I don't care about "hats" :) > If someone is right, he's right, a QA hat doesn't make something wrong > magically right. Also, if you'd ask me, QA should be more about Quality > Assurance, meaning training people, writing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10/10/15 9:25 AM, hasufell wrote: As you might know, I haven't really reviewed much on dev ML either, until people started ranting about our Social Contract, how github is against it and that everything must be public on our own infra channels. To be clear, I like your "small" reviews on

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:09:11 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, developers. > > I have the pleasure to announce that we have formed a new Reviewers > team [1] for Gentoo. The team is going to assemble developers willing > to perform ebuild reviews and help contributors

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

On 10/10/2015 04:27 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> The side goal is to review current Gentoo commits for major QA >> violations and other issues, aiming at improving the quality of >> ebuilds in Gentoo and helping other developers using bash, ebuilds >> and git effectively. > > This is completely

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Team leader(s) election meeting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/10/2015 10:22 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 16:24:20 +0200 Alexander Berntsen > wrote: > >>> On 01/10/15 16:19, Brian Dolbec wrote: Now for my re-election >>> platform / campaign speech ;) >> Mine is far

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 18:59:22 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:43:29 -0700 > Alec Warner wrote: > > I don't see why someone could not write an 'ebuild vet' or 'ebuild > > fmt' tool; it doesn't have to start as a strict

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10/10/2015 03:54 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: > > Dear Julian, > > avoiding this mailing list for further reviews is great news. > Still, I'd like to opt-out from receiving any mails arising from project > "Reviewers". > If there are QA-related issues with packages, I maintain, please file a > bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/10/2015 04:30 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:15 AM, hasufell > wrote: >> >> Nevertheless, we'll try to continue, reduce public noise and keep >> the reviews useful. >> > > Bugs would probably be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:43:29 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > I don't see why someone could not write an 'ebuild vet' or 'ebuild > fmt' tool; it doesn't have to start as a strict component of repoman > at all (although ideally it ends up there to be run automatically.) Parsing bash

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 14:24:28 +0200 > Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote: > > > > +RDEPEND=" > > > > + !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0 ) > > > > + libressl? (

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10.10.2015 15:25, hasufell wrote: > On 10/10/2015 03:14 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: >> >> Dear Michał, >> >> first of all, please stick to the truth. >> >> In #gentoo-dev: >> mrueg: as i pointed out, it was because i see it in pull >> requests and gentoo developers are teaching bad practices to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:15 AM, hasufell wrote: > > Nevertheless, we'll try to continue, reduce public noise and keep the > reviews useful. > Bugs would probably be helpful from the standpoint that they also are a mechanism to keep track of whether the issue was corrected.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 14:24:28 +0200 Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote: > > > +RDEPEND=" > > > + !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0 ) > > > + libressl? ( dev-libs/libressl ) > > > + sys-libs/zlib > > > + net-libs/http-parser > > > > Please order

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:43:29 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Brian Dolbec > wrote: > > > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 14:24:28 +0200 > > Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > > > On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:32:01 +0200 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 10/10/2015 04:30 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:15 AM, hasufell > > wrote: > >> > >> Nevertheless, we'll try to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:44:45 +0200 hasufell wrote: > On 10/10/2015 04:27 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > >> The side goal is to review current Gentoo commits for major QA > >> violations and other issues, aiming at improving the quality of > >> ebuilds in Gentoo and helping

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Team leader(s) election meeting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 & I vote for Zac and Brian. :] If I am elected lead (which is looking quite likely right now), Brian will keep being in charge of releases. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

[gentoo-dev] rfc: multilib and fhs 3

All, fhs 3.0 was approved in June this year [1] [2]. The piece of it that I want to bring up is the lib and libxx directories, both in / and /usr. The way I read the fhs, /lib and /usr/lib should hold the files for the default abi and /libxx and /usr/libxx should hold the files for the alternate

[gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

Hello, developers. I have the pleasure to announce that we have formed a new Reviewers team [1] for Gentoo. The team is going to assemble developers willing to perform ebuild reviews and help contributors improve their ebuild skills. The main goal of the team is to handle GitHub pull requests.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: /

On 10/10/2015 11:29 AM, Andreas Hüttel wrote: > commit: a33ebdd225fcf82f3e81a81f676de007bdecd670 > Author: Andreas K. Huettel (dilfridge) gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Sat Oct 10 09:30:20 2015 + > Commit: Andreas Hüttel gentoo org> > CommitDate: Sat Oct 10 09:30:20 2015 + >

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: /

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > > You should (almost) never commit reverse-merges of git.gentoo.org > master[0]. > > Instead, you have to use > git pull --rebase=preserve origin master > > in case you get "push conflicts" [1] > Which I tried several times, but git

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: /

On 10/10/2015 01:33 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > >> You should (almost) never commit reverse-merges of git.gentoo.org >> master[0]. > >> Instead, you have to use >> git pull --rebase=preserve origin master > >> in case you get "push conflicts" [1] > > > Which I tried several times, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: /

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/10/15 13:33, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > >> You should (almost) never commit reverse-merges of >> git.gentoo.org master[0]. > >> Instead, you have to use git pull --rebase=preserve origin >> master > >> in case you get "push conflicts" [1]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: /

Dnia 2015-10-10, o godz. 13:33:03 "Andreas K. Huettel" napisał(a): > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > > > > You should (almost) never commit reverse-merges of git.gentoo.org > > master[0]. > > > > Instead, you have to use > > git pull

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

Dnia 2015-10-10, o godz. 11:31:45 "Manuel Rüger" napisał(a): > commit: 9d15a1c12b3c4f98445a45c051733eb2a67fdb28 > Author: Manuel Rüger gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Sat Oct 10 11:30:54 2015 + > Commit: Manuel Rüger gentoo org> > CommitDate: Sat Oct 10 11:30:54

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote: > > +RDEPEND=" > > + !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0 ) > > + libressl? ( dev-libs/libressl ) > > + sys-libs/zlib > > + net-libs/http-parser > > Please order deps alphabetically (I know I added libressl without > reordering, but that was just

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-lisp/sbcl/

On 10/10/2015 06:56 AM, Andrey Grozin wrote: > commit: 286567c6d64830eb810dee92bad0038b4b91f50d > Author: Andrey Grozin gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Sat Oct 10 04:50:18 2015 + > Commit: Andrey Grozin gentoo org> > CommitDate: Sat Oct 10 04:50:18 2015 + > URL:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: media-sound/qmmp/

On 10/10/2015 12:52 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > commit: 7afe3acf2ff141d2940f2e02b6e232331d93f68e > Author: Markos Chandras gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Sat Oct 10 10:51:13 2015 + > Commit: Markos Chandras gentoo org> > CommitDate: Sat Oct 10 10:51:37 2015 + > URL:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: media-sound/qmmp/

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:06:28 +0200 hasufell wrote: > > + > > +src_prepare() { > > + if has_version dev-libs/libcdio-paranoia; then > > + sed -i \ > > + -e 's:cdio/cdda.h:cdio/paranoia/cdda.h:' \ > > + > >

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10/10/2015 01:31 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: > commit: 9d15a1c12b3c4f98445a45c051733eb2a67fdb28 > Author: Manuel Rüger gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Sat Oct 10 11:30:54 2015 + > Commit: Manuel Rüger gentoo org> > CommitDate: Sat Oct 10 11:30:54 2015 + > URL:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10/10/2015 02:24 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote: >>> +RDEPEND=" >>> + !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0 ) >>> + libressl? ( dev-libs/libressl ) >>> + sys-libs/zlib >>> + net-libs/http-parser >> >> Please order deps alphabetically (I know I added

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015, 14:25:28 schrieb hasufell: > > >> Please order deps alphabetically (I know I added libressl without > >> reordering, but that was just to keep the diff as small as possible). > > > > Is this a policy > > It is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10/10/2015 02:37 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 14:25:28 +0200 > hasufell wrote: > >> On 10/10/2015 02:24 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: >>> On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote: > +RDEPEND=" > + !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0 ) > +

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

Dnia 2015-10-10, o godz. 13:51:34 Michał Górny napisał(a): > Dnia 2015-10-10, o godz. 11:31:45 > "Manuel Rüger" napisał(a): > > > commit: 9d15a1c12b3c4f98445a45c051733eb2a67fdb28 > > Author: Manuel Rüger gentoo org> > > AuthorDate: Sat Oct 10

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10.10.2015 14:55, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-10-10, o godz. 13:51:34 > Michał Górny napisał(a): > >> Dnia 2015-10-10, o godz. 11:31:45 >> "Manuel Rüger" napisał(a): >> >>> commit: 9d15a1c12b3c4f98445a45c051733eb2a67fdb28 >>> Author: Manuel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10/10/2015 03:14 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: > > Dear Michał, > > first of all, please stick to the truth. > > In #gentoo-dev: > mrueg: as i pointed out, it was because i see it in pull > requests and gentoo developers are teaching bad practices to new recruits > mgorny: please don't CC me in