Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo-hosted code review

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/11/15 14:24, Michael Palimaka wrote: > Which workflow do you mean? Most features seem optional, allowing > people to work as they wish. It's been a while since I looked at it outside of GHC, so please bear in mind these things might have

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo-hosted code review

On 02/11/15 22:08, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > It is tailored to Facebook's workflow. Their workflow does not > coincide with most other people's workflow. It doesn't work for my > company, and I suspect it won't work for Gentoo either. Which workflow do you mean? Most features seem optional,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On 11/02/2015 01:27 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: >>> >> I wonder what would happen if we just... dropped a full clone of >> gentoo.git onto the rsync mirrors? >> >> > You find out how many users have limited bandwidth (again) > > Why on earth would you do the most wasteful hybrid strategy when people

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo-hosted code review

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/02/2015 01:26 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 02/11/15 09:07, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> On 11/01/2015 12:44 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: >>> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for >>> pull requests and code review and

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/4] egencache --update-changelogs: Support setting ChangeLog file name

--- bin/egencache | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/egencache b/bin/egencache index 6407a44..11f49c6 100755 --- a/bin/egencache +++ b/bin/egencache @@ -170,6 +170,12 @@ def parse_args(args): help="output file for use.local.desc

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 4/4] egencache --update-changelogs: Support reversing order

--- bin/egencache | 15 --- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/egencache b/bin/egencache index 984d9f2..51d115a 100755 --- a/bin/egencache +++ b/bin/egencache @@ -171,6 +171,9 @@ def parse_args(args): dest="uld_output") uc =

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHES] egencache --update-changelogs: fixes for infra rsync

Hi, A quick batch of patches fulfilling Infra requests needed for ChangeLog generation on rsync mirrors and fixing some minor issues. -- Best regards, Michał Górny

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/4] egencache --update-changelogs: Ignore all ChangeLog* files

--- bin/egencache | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bin/egencache b/bin/egencache index 11f49c6..f3eaa5c 100755 --- a/bin/egencache +++ b/bin/egencache @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ class GenChangeLogs(object): f = l.split()

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 3/4] egencache --update-changelogs: Replace $Header$ with autogen note

--- bin/egencache | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bin/egencache b/bin/egencache index f3eaa5c..984d9f2 100755 --- a/bin/egencache +++ b/bin/egencache @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ class GenChangeLogs(object): output.write(textwrap.dedent('''\

[gentoo-dev] Depending on a range of slots

In the dev-lang/php ebuilds, we currently have: DEPEND="... berkdb? ( =sys-libs/db-4* ) ..." PHP will actually accept any 4.x or 5.x version of db; the ./configure flag is poorly-named: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521222 Now, we also get repoman warnings for not specifying a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on a range of slots

On 11/02/2015 06:48 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > In the dev-lang/php ebuilds, we currently have: > .. > > Is there a way to say "give me any 4.x or 5.x slot"? > Is that necessarily a good idea? Given that the database formats are not compatible between versions without cleaning out the BDB

[gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

Duncan posted on Tue, 03 Nov 2015 06:43:45 + as excerpted: > Without that, confusion reigned, and blaming the user for confusion in > the absence of official signaling really doesn't help the situation, > either. I originally added, but unfortunately it got lost in the editing and I forgot

[gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

Rich Freeman posted on Mon, 02 Nov 2015 22:17:22 -0500 as excerpted: > Anything in /usr/portage that you can find on github is also on > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/, which is a Gentoo site. Well... not the metadata in the github repo with pregenerated metadata. While it's

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1] enable gccgo for all platform

On 02/11/15 23:38, William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> How about a virtual here? > > I don't see that working out to well because the compilers are > completely different from each

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On 11/03/2015 02:52 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > > So you are telling me that people using github and the switch that took > place has absolutely nothing to do with the changelogs going dead? > You keep saying GitHub. Github is not relevant to this discussion. > > Yes, the ChangeLogs stopped being

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/01/2015 04:22 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 11/1/15 7:16 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: >> Ahoi, >> >> I'm getting mildly very irritated with the lack of easily >> accessible ChangeLogs for our packages. >> >> Apparently updating them stopped

Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on a range of slots

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:33:57 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 11/02/2015 02:21 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 12:48:29 -0500 > > Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> Is there a way to say "give me any 4.x or 5.x slot"? > > > > No. Slots are

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHES] egencache --update-changelogs: fixes for infra rsync

On 11/02/2015 10:18 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > A quick batch of patches fulfilling Infra requests needed for ChangeLog > generation on rsync mirrors and fixing some minor issues. > > -- > Best regards, > Michał Górny > > The whole series looks good, except it's missing updates to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo-hosted code review

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > The way I see it, keeping review and committing/pushing separate is a > good thing, and removes a lot of the concerns about hosting a review > platform as it is sufficient with read-access to repositories. > > Thanks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:00:18 -0600 Dale wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Dale wrote: > >> Then perhaps all this should have been worked out BEFORE switching > >> to github? > > We didn't switch to github. > > Then why

Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on a range of slots

On 11/02/2015 01:00 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 11/02/2015 06:48 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> In the dev-lang/php ebuilds, we currently have: >> >> Is there a way to say "give me any 4.x or 5.x slot"? >> > > Is that necessarily a good idea? Given that the database formats are > not

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1] enable gccgo for all platform

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 How about a virtual here? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWN8OuXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ0QUU0N0I4NzFERUI0MTJFN0EyODE0NUFF

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog - Infra Response

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 08:05:56AM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015, Robin H Johnson wrote: > > > 1. Control of the OUTPUT filename for the generated changelog > > - the from-git generated changelog will go to 'ChangeLog.git' > > > [...] > > > Without #1, we have to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on a range of slots

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 12:48:29 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Is there a way to say "give me any 4.x or 5.x slot"? No. Slots are meaningless strings and do not support any comparison except equality. -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on a range of slots

On 11/02/2015 02:21 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 12:48:29 -0500 > Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> Is there a way to say "give me any 4.x or 5.x slot"? > > No. Slots are meaningless strings and do not support any comparison > except equality. > Followup question,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on a range of slots

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:33:57 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Followup question, which of these is less dumb? > > Option 1: berkdb? ( >=sys-libs/db-4:* Option 2: berkdb? ( || ( sys-libs/db:4.2 ... sys-libs/db:5.3 ) ) Best option goes leftmost in ||. -- Ciaran McCreesh

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Dale wrote: >> Then perhaps all this should have been worked out BEFORE switching to >> github? > We didn't switch to github. Then why are people saying to use git to look at the logs? I don't want to use git. I liked

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog

Actually, git log understands if you specify path for it (especially after --)... 03.11.2015 02:05, Daniel Campbell пишет: > On 11/01/2015 04:22 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > On 11/1/15 7:16 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > >> Ahoi, > >> > >> I'm getting mildly very irritated with the lack of

[gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

Rich Freeman posted on Sun, 01 Nov 2015 20:56:24 -0500 as excerpted: > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >> I know if I were still on rsync (or webrsync), I'd be raising hell >> about the lack of >> changelogs well before now > > Perhaps rather than raising

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-hosted code review

Sunday 01 Nov 2015 18:08:06, James Le Cuirot wrote : > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 04:44:39 +1100 > Michael Palimaka wrote: > > > Phabricator also has all sorts of fancy (optional) features that could > > be useful for collaborative development (see http://phabricator.org/ > > for

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] xpak-helper: rewrite to rely more on argparse

On 11/02/2015 09:06 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 11/02/2015 08:52 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On 01 Nov 2015 09:36, Zac Medico wrote: >>> In order to handle python3 with arguments containing UTF-8 characters >>> (in ${PKGDIR}) and a mis-matched sys.getfilesystemencoding() value, it's >>> safest to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1] enable gccgo for all platform

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 12:17:26PM -0500, Leno Hou wrote: > 1. go compiler only support x86 platform > 2. gcc 5 includes go command to build go apps > 3. for coreos enablement, it's use gcc 5 to build go apps Also, once this is in place, I believe I could use gccgo to build go-1.5 and newer,

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog - Infra Response

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 05:50:39 + "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > I'm replying to the top level of the thread, because I've been on > offline vacation recharging myself for a week, and this thread seems > to have degenerated into ways to avoid the issue, rather than > focusing

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] xpak-helper: rewrite to rely more on argparse

On 01 Nov 2015 09:36, Zac Medico wrote: > On 10/31/2015 10:23 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > The current code implements a lot of ad-hoc argument parsing when it > > could simply let the argparse module do it all for it. This makes the > > code easier to understand and extend in the process. > >

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] xpak-helper: rewrite to rely more on argparse

On 11/02/2015 08:52 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 01 Nov 2015 09:36, Zac Medico wrote: >> In order to handle python3 with arguments containing UTF-8 characters >> (in ${PKGDIR}) and a mis-matched sys.getfilesystemencoding() value, it's >> safest to decode the arguments like chmod-lite.py does. >

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1] enable gccgo for all platform

1. go compiler only support x86 platform 2. gcc 5 includes go command to build go apps 3. for coreos enablement, it's use gcc 5 to build go apps Signed-off-by: Leno Hou --- app-admin/consul-template/consul-template-0.9.0-r1.ebuild | 5 -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on a range of slots

On 11/02/2015 02:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:33:57 -0500 > Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> Followup question, which of these is less dumb? >> >> Option 1: berkdb? ( >=sys-libs/db-4:* > This doesn't mean what you think it means. A user who has db-3 and db-7

Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on a range of slots

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 22:01:05 +0100 hasufell wrote: > That's an interesting pitfall. I am pretty sure we have this kind of > syntax a lot in the tree. Might make sense to document it. Would make more sense just to implement version ranges in full generality, since developers

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog

On 2015-11-03 02:22, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > Actually, git log understands if you specify path for it (especially > after --)... > > > 03.11.2015 02:05, Daniel Campbell пишет: > > On 11/01/2015 04:22 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > > On 11/1/15 7:16 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/02/2015 12:00 PM, Dale wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Dale >> wrote: >>> Then perhaps all this should have been worked out BEFORE >>> switching to github? >> We didn't switch to github. >

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] egencache --update-changelogs: Support reversing order

--- bin/egencache | 15 --- man/egencache.1 | 4 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/egencache b/bin/egencache index 984d9f2..51d115a 100755 --- a/bin/egencache +++ b/bin/egencache @@ -171,6 +171,9 @@ def parse_args(args):

Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on a range of slots

On 11/02/2015 09:51 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 11/02/2015 02:48 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:33:57 -0500 >> Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> Followup question, which of these is less dumb? >>> >>> Option 1: berkdb? ( >=sys-libs/db-4:* > >> This doesn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On 11/02/2015 10:54 PM, Dale wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:00:18 -0600 >> Dale wrote: >>> Rich Freeman wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Dale wrote: > Then perhaps all this should have been worked out BEFORE

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:00:18 -0600 > Dale wrote: >> Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Dale wrote: Then perhaps all this should have been worked out BEFORE switching to github? >>> We didn't switch

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo-hosted code review

Patrice Clement posted on Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:33:49 +0100 as excerpted: > [gerrit] > > Anyway, just my 2 cents on the topic. Have a look and you'll see in > terms of features, I think it's on a par with Github. And it's open > source. ;) FWIW from previous gerrit suggestions... The problem

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo-hosted code review

Monday 02 Nov 2015 09:29:48, Duncan wrote : > Patrice Clement posted on Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:33:49 +0100 as excerpted: > > > [gerrit] > > > > Anyway, just my 2 cents on the topic. Have a look and you'll see in > > terms of features, I think it's on a par with Github. And it's open > > source. ;)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Depending on a range of slots

hasufell schrieb: Followup question, which of these is less dumb? Option 1: berkdb? ( >=sys-libs/db-4:* >> >>> This doesn't mean what you think it means. A user who has db-3 and db-7 >>> installed satisfies that dependency. >>> >> >> Indeed, thanks. >> > > That's an interesting

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1] enable gccgo for all platform

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > How about a virtual here? I don't see that working out to well because the compilers are completely different from each other. As I said, the reference implementation of

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHES] egencache --update-changelogs: fixes for infra rsync

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/11/15 20:18, Zac Medico wrote: > The whole series looks good, except it's missing updates to > man/egencache.1. This was my main feedback as well. LGTM now. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN

Re: [gentoo-dev] patch to fix windowmaker 0.95.7 emerge failure

Le 31/10/2015 22:07, Timur Aydin a écrit : Hello, Emerging windowmaker 0.95.7 fails on my ~amd64 gentoo linux system for quite some time now. The problem is in the ebuild file, where the LINGUAS variable is not being constructed correctly and ends up including newline characters after each

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-hosted code review

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 phabricator is very problematic in that it is a huge piece of PHP software that is very difficult to change, and it's virtually impossible to upstream your changes, unless they are simple bug fixes. It is tailored to Facebook's workflow. Their

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo-hosted code review

Patrice Clement posted on Mon, 02 Nov 2015 11:28:10 +0100 as excerpted: > By reading your answer, I'm not sure if it is clear or obvious for most > users how the workflow between the Gentoo infra <-> Github infra > functions so maybe we should explain it one more time: [...] > 4) How do we merge

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

hasufell wrote: > On 11/02/2015 10:54 PM, Dale wrote: >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:00:18 -0600 >>> Dale wrote: Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Dale wrote: >> Then perhaps all this should have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Dale wrote: > hasufell wrote: >> On 11/02/2015 10:54 PM, Dale wrote: >>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:00:18 -0600 Dale wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM,

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:17:18 -0500 "Aaron W. Swenson" wrote: > Vadim, please don't top post. But do quote some forty lines from the message you reply to. It really helps in case someone lost the original, right? :-) jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > On 11/02/2015 02:56 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >>> I know if I were still on rsync (or webrsync), I'd be raising hell about >>> the lack of >>>

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo-hosted code review

On 02/11/15 06:23, hasufell wrote: > On 11/01/2015 06:44 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: >> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for pull >> requests and code review and such, so I have set up a Phabricator >> instance against gentoo.git to see how a free alternative might work. >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Dale wrote: > > Then perhaps all this should have been worked out BEFORE switching to > github? We didn't switch to github. > > I don't mind change but it seem this one wasn't really ready to be done > yet although most made it sound like it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

Hi! On Sun, 01 Nov 2015, Martin Vaeth wrote: > Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote: > > > >> Now how can this user display the ChangeLog for > >> a certain package? > > ``` > > git log -- pkg-category/pkg-name/ > > You removed the crucial part of my posting: > > >> git clone --depth=1

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo-hosted code review

On 02/11/15 09:07, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 11/01/2015 12:44 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: >> There's been a lot of discussion about relying on GitHub for pull >> requests and code review and such, so I have set up a Phabricator >> instance against gentoo.git to see how a free alternative might

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Dale wrote: > I thought Gentoo was not depending on git/github either. Take 5min and read the wikipedia articles on both git and github, please. Gentoo is not going to depend on github, because of the social contract issues. Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1] enable gccgo for all platform

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:38 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > How about a virtual here? > > I don't see that working out to well because the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Dale wrote: > That is why a link was posted for me to use github instead. I > do realize and understand that git and github are two different things > but it seems they can work together as well. It ended up that the info > I needed was on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

Matt Turner wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Dale wrote: >> hasufell wrote: >>> On 11/02/2015 10:54 PM, Dale wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:00:18 -0600 > Dale wrote: >> Rich Freeman wrote: >>> On Mon,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Dale wrote: >> I thought Gentoo was not depending on git/github either. > Take 5min and read the wikipedia articles on both git and github, please. > > Gentoo is not going to depend on github, because of the social

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Dale wrote: >> I thought Gentoo was not depending on git/github either. > Take 5min and read the wikipedia articles on both git and github, please. > > Gentoo is not going to depend on github, because of the social