[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1] eclass/toolchain-bintuils: enable targets powerpc-linux-gnu for ppc64

Authored-by: Linda Jiang --- eclass/toolchain-binutils.eclass | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/eclass/toolchain-binutils.eclass b/eclass/toolchain-binutils.eclass index a23300f..6d2dde8 100644 --- a/eclass/toolchain-binutils.eclass +++

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-games/mygui/

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:52:24PM +1000, Sam Jorna wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:34 + (UTC) > > "Patrice Clement" wrote: > > > > > commit: 4f2477ca1ab07969bae57e7b47e8b7a5ba9a6050 > > > Author:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-games/mygui/

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:34 + (UTC) > "Patrice Clement" wrote: > > > commit: 4f2477ca1ab07969bae57e7b47e8b7a5ba9a6050 > > Author: Patrice Clement gentoo org> > > AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 06:35:31

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 1/8] app-text/opensp: Fix ppc64le configure problem

On 19 Apr 2016 22:12, Leno Hou wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/app-text/opensp/files/opensp-1.5.2-configure-with-ppc64le.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ > +--- configure.orig 2016-04-09 16:24:17.507053635 + > configure2016-04-09 16:25:41.851918142 + > +@@ -4947,6 +4947,9 @@ > +

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v4] Colorize packages in user sets (bug 577720)

Three new settings were added to /etc/portage/color.map: PKG_MERGE_USER_SET, PKG_BINARY_MERGE_USER_SET, and PKG_NOMERGE_USER_SET. These colors are applied when the package is selected from a set in /etc/portage/sets/ X-Gentoo-bug: 577720 X-Gentoo-bug-url:

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On 19 Apr 2016 04:02, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 4/19/16 1:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i waited until the known bugs died down. i don't have access to a > > tinderbox system myself. > > you didn't notice that coreutils and systemd/udev/eudev broke? i had pushed the coreutils issue

[gentoo-dev] l10n.eclass: update l10n_find_plocales_changes()

​ Hello everybody, I've updated `l10n_find_plocales_changes()` from l10n.eclass. Please review the change. GitHub PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/1308 Regards Jan

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On Apr 19, 2016 6:28 PM, "Anthony G. Basile" wrote: > yeah we need to buy him a drink or something really. i'd say make him a > dev but i'm not sure i'd inflict that punishment on anyone :P +1 make him a dev. Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On 4/19/16 8:07 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:41:06 -0400 > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote: >>> Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike >>> Frysinger: On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 1/8] app-text/opensp: Fix ppc64le configure problem

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Leno Hou wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > >> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 22:32:51 +0800 >> Leno Hou wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 1/8] app-text/opensp: Fix ppc64le configure problem

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 22:32:51 +0800 > Leno Hou wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Michał Górny > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 22:12:59 +0800 > > > Leno Hou

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 1/8] app-text/opensp: Fix ppc64le configure problem

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 22:32:51 +0800 Leno Hou wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 22:12:59 +0800 > > Leno Hou wrote: > > > > > --- > > > .../opensp-1.5.2-configure-with-ppc64le.patch

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 1/8] app-text/opensp: Fix ppc64le configure problem

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 22:12:59 +0800 > Leno Hou wrote: > > > --- > > .../opensp-1.5.2-configure-with-ppc64le.patch | 26 > ++ > > app-text/opensp/opensp-1.5.2-r3.ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 1/8] app-text/opensp: Fix ppc64le configure problem

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 22:12:59 +0800 Leno Hou wrote: > --- > .../opensp-1.5.2-configure-with-ppc64le.patch | 26 > ++ > app-text/opensp/opensp-1.5.2-r3.ebuild | 3 ++- > app-text/opensp/opensp-1.5.2-r4.ebuild | 1 + > 3 files

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 7/8] sys-libs/gdbm: Fix ppc64le configure problem

--- .../files/gdbm-1.11-configure-with-ppc64le.patch | 26 ++ sys-libs/gdbm/gdbm-1.11.ebuild | 1 + 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+) create mode 100644 sys-libs/gdbm/files/gdbm-1.11-configure-with-ppc64le.patch diff --git

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 8/8] sys-process/procps: Fix ppc64le configure problem

--- .../procps-3.3.10-configure-with-ppc64le.patch | 26 ++ sys-process/procps/procps-3.3.10-r1.ebuild | 1 + 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+) create mode 100644 sys-process/procps/files/procps-3.3.10-configure-with-ppc64le.patch diff --git

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 5/8] sys-apps/acl: Fix ppc64le configure problem

--- sys-apps/acl/acl-2.2.52-r1.ebuild | 2 ++ .../files/acl-2.2.52-configure-with-ppc64le.patch | 26 ++ 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+) create mode 100644 sys-apps/acl/files/acl-2.2.52-configure-with-ppc64le.patch diff --git

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 6/8] sys-apps/attr: Fix ppc64le configure problem

--- sys-apps/attr/attr-2.4.47-r2.ebuild| 1 + .../files/attr-2.4.47-configure-with-ppc64le.patch | 26 ++ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+) create mode 100644 sys-apps/attr/files/attr-2.4.47-configure-with-ppc64le.patch diff --git

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 4/8] net-libs/libmnl: Fix ppc64le configure problem

--- .../libmnl-1.0.3-configure-with-ppc64le.patch | 26 ++ net-libs/libmnl/libmnl-1.0.3-r1.ebuild | 4 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+) create mode 100644 net-libs/libmnl/files/libmnl-1.0.3-configure-with-ppc64le.patch diff --git

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 3/8] net-firewall/iptables: Fix ppc64le configure problem

--- .../iptables-1.4.21-configure-with-ppc64le.patch | 26 ++ net-firewall/iptables/iptables-1.4.21-r1.ebuild| 3 +++ net-firewall/iptables/iptables-1.4.21-r2.ebuild| 2 ++ net-firewall/iptables/iptables-1.4.21-r3.ebuild| 2 ++

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 1/8] app-text/opensp: Fix ppc64le configure problem

--- .../opensp-1.5.2-configure-with-ppc64le.patch | 26 ++ app-text/opensp/opensp-1.5.2-r3.ebuild | 3 ++- app-text/opensp/opensp-1.5.2-r4.ebuild | 1 + 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v1][ 2/8] dev-libs/expat: Fix ppc64le configure problem

--- dev-libs/expat/expat-2.1.0-r5.ebuild | 1 + .../files/expat-2.1.0-configure-with-ppc64le.patch | 78 ++ 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+) create mode 100644 dev-libs/expat/files/expat-2.1.0-configure-with-ppc64le.patch diff --git

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:41:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike > > Frysinger: > > > On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > > So why on earth are we applying a

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On 4/19/16 1:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i waited until the known bugs died down. i don't have access to a > tinderbox system myself. you didn't notice that coreutils and systemd/udev/eudev broke? anyhow, i don't think this whole affair is as bad as i first did, its an easy fix to pkgs.

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On 19 Apr 2016 08:15, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:41:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike Frysinger: > > > > On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > > > So why on

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:41:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike Frysinger: > > > On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > > So why on earth are we applying a random