Re: [gentoo-dev] Transitioning from #!/sbin/runscript to,#!/sbin/openrc-run

2016-05-04 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 05/05/2016 01:12 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 07:41:39PM +1000, Sam Jorna wrote: >> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:57:44AM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >>> On 05/04/2016 10:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:00:05AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Transitioning from #!/sbin/runscript to,#!/sbin/openrc-run

2016-05-04 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 07:41:39PM +1000, Sam Jorna wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:57:44AM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > On 05/04/2016 10:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: > > > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:00:05AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Austin English

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re : Cannot see my eclass modifications

2016-05-04 Thread Farid BENAMROUCHE
ok, thank you.I will try the chroot stuff as soon as I have some time. As for what I'm trying to do: making portage able to add user/groups when using --root option. This is a known limitation since a long time. I'm currently also discussing this point with the "shadow" upstream team (I have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

2016-05-04 Thread waltdnes
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 04:05:50PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote > On 04/05/16 03:43 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > > > > emerge --keyword-write > > > > ... similar to "emerge --autounmask-write", but have it write to > > package.accept_keywords, rather than package.unmask? > > > > That

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

2016-05-04 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
On 04/05/16 03:43 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > > emerge --keyword-write > > ... similar to "emerge --autounmask-write", but have it write to > package.accept_keywords, rather than package.unmask? > > That would achieve the effect that people are looking for, with less > work. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

2016-05-04 Thread waltdnes
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 09:46:10PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > >> The solution is to have people with an actual interest in a specific > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re : Cannot see my eclass modifications

2016-05-04 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
On 04/05/16 02:30 PM, Farid BENAMROUCHE wrote: > hum... yes I've setup all the relevant settings in my /etc/portage... > I've also read the man, and still not understanding why. > > But At least you are confirming me that directly modifying the user.eclass in > /usr/portage/eclass should work! >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re : Cannot see my eclass modifications

2016-05-04 Thread Farid BENAMROUCHE
hum... yes I've setup all the relevant settings in my /etc/portage... I've also read the man, and still not understanding why. But At least you are confirming me that directly modifying the user.eclass in /usr/portage/eclass should work! The exact command line I've used was ROOT=/sysroot emerge

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

2016-05-04 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: >> Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> "doing your job" >> >> Remember that everyone is a volunteer. > > I am referring to arch testing as a job, because it only

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

2016-05-04 Thread Damien LEVAC
On 05/04/2016 11:41 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: On 04/05/16 02:01 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: On 4 May 2016 at 16:46, Matt Turner wrote: Having built many stages for an "unstable" arch (mips) has taught me one thing: it's awful being unstable-only. There's no end to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

2016-05-04 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Mike Gilbert wrote: >> "doing your job" > > Remember that everyone is a volunteer. I am referring to arch testing as a job, because it only really works if people treat it that way. If stabilization does not take place in a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

2016-05-04 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
On 04/05/16 02:01 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 4 May 2016 at 16:46, Matt Turner wrote: >> Having built many stages for an "unstable" arch (mips) has taught me >> one thing: it's awful being unstable-only. There's no end to the >> compilation failures and other such headaches,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dev retirement - Farewell message

2016-05-04 Thread Ian Bloss
prends soin de toi On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:43 AM Sven Vermeulen wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 04:57:09PM +0200, José Fournier wrote: > > I have been a bit far from Gentoo for a rather long time now. I joined > > Gentoo in 2013 and I used to be a translator for the French

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

2016-05-04 Thread Peter Stuge
Mike Gilbert wrote: > "doing your job" Remember that everyone is a volunteer. > dropping stable keywords on everything but the bare necessities Gentoo magically does a number of things which upstream never intended and do not intentionally support. It is amazing, and thank you so much to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Transitioning from #!/sbin/runscript to,#!/sbin/openrc-run

2016-05-04 Thread Manuel Rüger
On 04.05.2016 11:19, Duncan wrote: > Ulrich Mueller posted on Wed, 04 May 2016 10:00:05 +0200 as excerpted: > >>> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Austin English wrote: >> Your list of affected packages obtained with "git grep" in the Portage tree will not be complete, since the command won't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

2016-05-04 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > Having built many stages for an "unstable" arch (mips) has taught me > one thing: it's awful being unstable-only. There's no end to the > compilation failures and other such headaches, none of which have > anything at all

[gentoo-dev] Re: Transitioning from #!/sbin/runscript to,#!/sbin/openrc-run

2016-05-04 Thread Duncan
Ulrich Mueller posted on Wed, 04 May 2016 10:00:05 +0200 as excerpted: >> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Austin English wrote: > >>> Your list of affected packages obtained with "git grep" in the Portage >>> tree will not be complete, since the command won't catch any init >>> scripts installed from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Transitioning from #!/sbin/runscript to,#!/sbin/openrc-run

2016-05-04 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 05/04/2016 10:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:00:05AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Austin English wrote: >> Your list of affected packages obtained with "git grep" in the Portage tree will not be complete, since the command won't catch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

2016-05-04 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 05/04/2016 06:46 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >>> The solution is to have people with an actual interest in a specific >>> architecture determine

Re: [gentoo-dev] Transitioning from #!/sbin/runscript to,#!/sbin/openrc-run

2016-05-04 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Austin English wrote: >> Your list of affected packages obtained with "git grep" in the >> Portage tree will not be complete, since the command won't catch >> any init scripts installed from elsewhere. You should look for the >> set of installed files instead. > How is

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: include HOME in the variable.readonly check

2016-05-04 Thread Göktürk Yüksek
According to the PMS section 11.1, HOME is a read-only variable. Include it in the list of read-only variables for the variable.readonly check in repoman. Signed-off-by: Göktürk Yüksek --- pym/repoman/modules/scan/ebuild/checks.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),

[gentoo-portage-dev] Fw: [PATCH] xml-text/missing-doctype: test for missing DOCTYPE in metadata.xml

2016-05-04 Thread Brian Dolbec
Begin forwarded message: Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 00:14:55 -0700 From: Brian Dolbec To: Göktürk Yüksek Subject: Re: [PATCH] xml-text/missing-doctype: test for missing DOCTYPE in metadata.xml On Wed, 4 May 2016 01:57:19 -0400 Göktürk Yüksek

Re: [gentoo-dev] Transitioning from #!/sbin/runscript to,#!/sbin/openrc-run

2016-05-04 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 3 May 2016, Austin English wrote: > I've been working on the transition from #!/sbin/runscript to > #!/sbin/openrc-run [1], by starting on the maintainer-needed > packages. That's done (aside from some stabilizations needed, but > I'll deal with that latter). The trouble is that

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] xml-test/valid: valid metadata.xml test based on the example in GLEP 68

2016-05-04 Thread Göktürk Yüksek
Signed-off-by: Göktürk Yüksek --- xml-test/valid/metadata.xml | 64 + xml-test/valid/valid-0.1.ebuild | 12 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+) create mode 100644 xml-test/valid/metadata.xml create mode 100644

Re: [gentoo-dev] Transitioning from #!/sbin/runscript to,#!/sbin/openrc-run

2016-05-04 Thread Austin English
On 05/04/2016 01:02 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 05/04/2016 06:27 AM, Austin English wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I've been working on the transition from #!/sbin/runscript to >> #!/sbin/openrc-run [1], > ... and once more I have to ask: > > Is there any reason that Stuff Needs To Change because of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Transitioning from #!/sbin/runscript to,#!/sbin/openrc-run

2016-05-04 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 05/04/2016 06:27 AM, Austin English wrote: > Hi there, > > I've been working on the transition from #!/sbin/runscript to > #!/sbin/openrc-run [1], ... and once more I have to ask: Is there any reason that Stuff Needs To Change because of a packaging conflict in *debian* where it really doesn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

2016-05-04 Thread Kent Fredric
On 4 May 2016 at 16:46, Matt Turner wrote: > Having built many stages for an "unstable" arch (mips) has taught me > one thing: it's awful being unstable-only. There's no end to the > compilation failures and other such headaches, none of which have > anything at all to do