Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 23:21:34 -0800 Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 12/02/2016 10:45 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > On 02/12/16 01:31 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:24:29 -0500 > >> Mike Gilbert wrote: > >>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:10

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

> We could make a more "user friendly" feature by setting up bash > completion for package names, but that sounds a) daunting, b) > error-prone, and c) probably not worth the time spent writing the > script(s) necessary. By the way, the ones for zsh is already done and working (even for sets).

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revision bumps vs git commits atomicity

On 12/02/2016 07:14 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi all! > > Right now we have two somewhat conflicting policies (at least up to > my understanding of them): > > 1) git atomic commits [1]: > each logical change should be a separate commit. > > 2) revision bump policy [2]: > each change

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On 12/02/2016 06:09 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > On Friday, December 02, 2016 02:10:27 PM Michał Górny wrote: >> Hi, everyone. >> >> I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being >> started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects >> that I've forgotten who was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On 12/02/2016 10:47 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48 -0500 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> The devmanual states: >> >> The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented letters, >> the digits 0-9, hyphens, underscores and plus characters. Uppercase

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On 12/02/2016 08:09 PM, Nick Vinson wrote: > > [snip] > Personally, I've disliked that differentiation. Most people don't pay > close enough attention to such things. For example, how many people > think iOS and IOS are the same thing? > > -Nicholas Vinson Anyone familiar with Wii homebrew

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On 12/02/2016 10:45 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 02/12/16 01:31 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:24:29 -0500 >> Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Ciaran McCreesh >>> wrote: On Fri, 2 Dec 2016

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 01:04:17AM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:49:59PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote > > > > So, should we clean up / rename packages that do not follow this as we > > find them, like my ConfigArgParse example? > > find /usr/portage -name *.ebuild | grep

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:10:27PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. Flameeyes donated his

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] bin/ebuild: fix EBUILD_FORCE_TEST / RESTRICT interaction (bug 601466)

Ensure that config adjustments are applied to all relevant config instances, in order to prevent inconsistencies like the one that triggered bug 601466. X-Gentoo-Bug: 601466 X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601466 --- bin/ebuild | 23 --- 1 file

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:49:59PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote > > So, should we clean up / rename packages that do not follow this as we > find them, like my ConfigArgParse example? find /usr/portage -name *.ebuild | grep [A-Z] | sed "s/-[0-9].*//" | sort -u > upper.txt ...gives 1814 *UNIQUE*

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On 12/02/2016 10:28 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016, Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> The devmanual states: >> The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented letters, >> the digits 0-9, hyphens, underscores and plus characters. Uppercase >> characters are strongly

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:13:48PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48 -0500 > > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > >> The devmanual states: > >> > >> The name section should contain only

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48 -0500 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> The devmanual states: >> >> The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented letters, >> the digits 0-9, hyphens, underscores and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:38:19 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 07:47:01PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48 -0500 > > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > > The devmanual states: > > > > > > The name section should

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revision bumps vs git commits atomicity

Ühel kenal päeval, R, 02.12.2016 kell 11:26, kirjutas Matt Turner: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Andrew Savchenko > wrote: > > > > Hi all! > > > > Right now we have two somewhat conflicting policies (at least up to > > my understanding of them): > > > > 1) git atomic

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Cleanup. Remove die from global, scope per EAPI 6 rules

On 12/01/2016 07:27 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > EAPI 6 prohibits dying in global scope. Move that check to pkg_setup. > > --- > eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 8 +--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Committed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:38:19 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 07:47:01PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48 -0500 > > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > > The devmanual states: > > > > > > The name section should

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 07:47:01PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48 -0500 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > The devmanual states: > > > > The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented letters, > > the digits 0-9, hyphens, underscores and plus

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revision bumps vs git commits atomicity

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi all! > > Right now we have two somewhat conflicting policies (at least up to > my understanding of them): > > 1) git atomic commits [1]: > each logical change should be a separate commit. > > 2) revision bump policy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > The devmanual states: > > The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented letters, > the digits 0-9, hyphens, underscores and plus characters. Uppercase > characters are strongly discouraged, but technically

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On 02/12/16 01:31 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:24:29 -0500 > Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Ciaran McCreesh >> wrote: >>> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48 -0500 >>> Mike Gilbert

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:24:29 -0500 > Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Ciaran McCreesh >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016, Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> The devmanual states: >> The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented letters, >> the digits 0-9, hyphens, underscores and plus characters. Uppercase >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016, Mike Gilbert wrote: > The devmanual states: > The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented letters, > the digits 0-9, hyphens, underscores and plus characters. Uppercase > characters are strongly discouraged, but technically valid. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:24:29 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Ciaran McCreesh > wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48 -0500 > > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> The devmanual states: > >> > >> The name

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48 -0500 > Mike Gilbert wrote: >> The devmanual states: >> >> The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented letters, >> the digits 0-9, hyphens,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

Ühel kenal päeval, R, 02.12.2016 kell 13:02, kirjutas Mike Gilbert: > The devmanual states: > > The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented letters, > the digits 0-9, hyphens, underscores and plus characters. Uppercase > characters are strongly discouraged, but technically valid.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > The devmanual states: > > The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented letters, > the digits 0-9, hyphens, underscores and plus characters. Uppercase > characters are strongly discouraged, but technically

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:02:48 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > The devmanual states: > > The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented letters, > the digits 0-9, hyphens, underscores and plus characters. Uppercase > characters are strongly discouraged, but technically

[gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

The devmanual states: The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented letters, the digits 0-9, hyphens, underscores and plus characters. Uppercase characters are strongly discouraged, but technically valid. https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html Why are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revision bumps vs git commits atomicity

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 18:14:05 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi all! > > Right now we have two somewhat conflicting policies (at least up to > my understanding of them): > > 1) git atomic commits [1]: > each logical change should be a separate commit. > > 2) revision bump

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revision bumps vs git commits atomicity

On 12/02/2016 10:14 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > If both policies are to be followed, users will see something like: > foo-1.0 -> foo-1.1-r8 (assuming each sufficient change was made as > a separate commit with a revision bump). > > While such versioning change is technically correct, it is >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revision bumps vs git commits atomicity

On 02/12/16 10:32 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> What about the following forkflow: >> - version bump first with minimal changes required, but without >> pushing commit to the tree; >> - make each logical change as a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revision bumps vs git commits atomicity

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > What about the following forkflow: > - version bump first with minimal changes required, but without > pushing commit to the tree; > - make each logical change as a separate commit without revision > bumps and without

[gentoo-dev] Revision bumps vs git commits atomicity

Hi all! Right now we have two somewhat conflicting policies (at least up to my understanding of them): 1) git atomic commits [1]: each logical change should be a separate commit. 2) revision bump policy [2]: each change sufficiently affecting application run-time or installed files should have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

On Friday, December 02, 2016 02:10:27 PM Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being > started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects > that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. > > I know that Toralf

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

On Thursday, December 01, 2016 10:13:17 PM Andrey Utkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:50:42PM -0800, Daniel Campbell wrote: [snip] > > Thanks for bringing this to attention. It's somewhat related to another > > discussion we've been having about copyright, and it may be worth > >

[gentoo-dev] Tinderboxing efforts in Gentoo

Hi, everyone. I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. I know that Toralf is doing tinderboxing for most of the stuff. What other projects do we have