Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] check-reqs.eclass: Repl. I_KNOW_WHAT_I_AM_DOING w/ CHECKREQS_DONOTHING

2021-07-24 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
On 23.07.2021 08:58, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner > --- > eclass/check-reqs.eclass | 13 ++--- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/check-reqs.eclass b/eclass/check-reqs.eclass > index 39e4bad1363..836dd0d4a1f

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing SHA512 hash from Manifests

2021-07-24 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, I don't understand. Isn't it the same motion we put down just 2 months ago [1]? Or is this something new? If this isn't something new, what has changed since May [2]? To remember: Currently we have two different hashes for every distfile. If we are going to throw this data away, we

Re: [gentoo-dev] libffi-3.4 is on the horison (unkeyworded for now, ~arch soon)

2021-07-24 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Sat, 17 Jul 2021 20:14:52 +0100 Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 00:20:58 +0100 > Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > Tl;DR > > - > > > > libffi-3.4 entered ::gento without KEYWORDS today. > > After some testing it will be promoted into ~arch. > > > > libffi has two

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing SHA512 hash from Manifests

2021-07-24 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 7/24/2021 11:16, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've been asked to repost the idea of removing SHA512 hash from > Manifests, effectively limiting them to BLAKE2B. > > The 'old' set of Gentoo hashes including SHA512 went live in July 2012. > In November 2017, we have decided to remove

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Add deblob support only for python3

2021-07-24 Thread Mike
On 7/24/21 2:15 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >> My modest opinion on the topic is: >> As far that is free software and there are users that use deblob, I >> don't see any reason on why we should not support this and give them >> the >> choice. Gentoo is about choice. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Add deblob support only for python3

2021-07-24 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> My modest opinion on the topic is: > As far that is free software and there are users that use deblob, I > don't see any reason on why we should not support this and give them > the > choice. Gentoo is about choice. [snip] > deblob is only supported for rt-sources. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2021-07-24 Thread Petr Vaněk
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 06:32:21PM +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 19:20:16 +0200 > Petr Vaněk wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 11:31:59PM +0200, Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier wrote: > > > [2021-07-23 08:40:50+0100] Sergei Trofimovich: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Add deblob support only for python3

2021-07-24 Thread Alice
On 7/25/21 2:28 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sun, 2021-07-25 at 01:57 +0900, Alice wrote: On 7/25/21 1:56 AM, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia July 24, 2021 4:52:28 PM UTC, Alice napisał(a): On 7/24/21 3:30 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sat, 24 Jul 2021, alicef wrote: On July 24, 2021 3:21:56 AM

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2021-07-24 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 19:20:16 +0200 Petr Vaněk wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 11:31:59PM +0200, Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier wrote: > > [2021-07-23 08:40:50+0100] Sergei Trofimovich: > > > dev-lang/elixir > > > dev-lang/erlang > > I am remaining dev-lang/erlang proxy-maintainer. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Add deblob support only for python3

2021-07-24 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2021-07-25 at 01:57 +0900, Alice wrote: > On 7/25/21 1:56 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Dnia July 24, 2021 4:52:28 PM UTC, Alice napisał(a): > > > On 7/24/21 3:30 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 24 Jul 2021, alicef wrote: > > > > > > > > > On July 24, 2021 3:21:56 AM

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2021-07-24 Thread Petr Vaněk
Hi, On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 11:31:59PM +0200, Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier wrote: > [2021-07-23 08:40:50+0100] Sergei Trofimovich: > > dev-lang/elixir > > dev-lang/erlang I am remaining dev-lang/erlang proxy-maintainer. I came to the package approximately in the same time like Sergei, when I did

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Add deblob support only for python3

2021-07-24 Thread Alice
On 7/25/21 1:56 AM, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia July 24, 2021 4:52:28 PM UTC, Alice napisał(a): On 7/24/21 3:30 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sat, 24 Jul 2021, alicef wrote: On July 24, 2021 3:21:56 AM GMT+09:00, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Alice wrote: GNU

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Add deblob support only for python3

2021-07-24 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia July 24, 2021 4:52:28 PM UTC, Alice napisał(a): >On 7/24/21 3:30 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> On Sat, 24 Jul 2021, alicef wrote: >> >>> On July 24, 2021 3:21:56 AM GMT+09:00, Ulrich Mueller > wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Alice wrote: >> GNU FSDG-compliance require

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Add deblob support only for python3

2021-07-24 Thread Alice
On 7/24/21 3:30 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sat, 24 Jul 2021, alicef wrote: On July 24, 2021 3:21:56 AM GMT+09:00, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Alice wrote: GNU FSDG-compliance require not only removing non-free code but also to disable loading of known non-free

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Removing SHA512 hash from Manifests

2021-07-24 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, everyone. I've been asked to repost the idea of removing SHA512 hash from Manifests, effectively limiting them to BLAKE2B. The 'old' set of Gentoo hashes including SHA512 went live in July 2012. In November 2017, we have decided to remove the two other hashes and add BLAKE2B in their stead.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Add deblob support only for python3

2021-07-24 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 24 Jul 2021, alicef wrote: > On July 24, 2021 3:21:56 AM GMT+09:00, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Alice wrote: >> GNU FSDG-compliance require not only removing non-free code but also to disable loading of known non-free firmware. >> >> So they