El mié, 12-09-2012 a las 18:30 -0400, Sean Amoss escribió:
On 09/12/2012 02:54 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 13-09-2012 a las 04:30 +1000, Michael Palimaka escribió:
On 2012-09-13 03:59, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
Currently, package maintainers are CCed to security bugs when
El jue, 13-09-2012 a las 03:43 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:53:20 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
You can un-CC yourself. I don't see why security@ should be doing
the legwork.
It shouldn't be so hard to do, they can do it just when they CC
El jue, 13-09-2012 a las 15:48 +0200, Alex Legler escribió:
On 12.09.2012 19:59, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
Currently, package maintainers are CCed to security bugs when their are
needed. The problem is that, once maintainers add a fixed version and
tell security team they are ok to get
El mié, 12-09-2012 a las 08:44 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/09/12 06:23 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:01 PM, William Hubbs
willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can agree that a server would probably want a static
Hello
Currently, package maintainers are CCed to security bugs when their are
needed. The problem is that, once maintainers add a fixed version and
tell security team they are ok to get it stabilized, maintainers are
kept CCed until bug is closed by security team. This usually means
getting a lot
El mié, 12-09-2012 a las 20:29 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 19:59:01 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello
Currently, package maintainers are CCed to security bugs when their
are needed. The problem is that, once maintainers add a fixed version
El jue, 13-09-2012 a las 04:30 +1000, Michael Palimaka escribió:
On 2012-09-13 03:59, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
Currently, package maintainers are CCed to security bugs when their are
needed. The problem is that, once maintainers add a fixed version and
tell security team they are ok
El mié, 12-09-2012 a las 14:42 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
So you would want to be re-CC'd when it is time to remove the vulnerable
versions, I guess.
Isn't this done shortly after keywording is complete? I think
El jue, 02-08-2012 a las 12:34 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 08/01/2012 11:36 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mié, 01-08-2012 a las 16:14 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 08/01/2012 03:19 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
On every openrc update I get dispatch-conf wanting to revert all my
changes in /etc
El mar, 31-07-2012 a las 22:31 +0200, Maciej Grela escribió:
2012/7/31 Amadeusz Żołnowski aide...@gentoo.org:
I have taken it recently, but realised I'm not going to use aiccu on
Gentoo any time soon. Sorry for mess-up.
Hi,
I'd like to volunteer for being a proxy maintainer for this
On every openrc update I get dispatch-conf wanting to revert all my
changes in /etc/conf.d files, like KEYMAP, clock...
Is there any way to prevent it from doing that?
Thanks a lot for the info
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
El vie, 27-07-2012 a las 13:24 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
On Friday 27 July 2012 08:13:16 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
As I had pointed out before [1], changing from POSIX to an en_US
locale will have undesirable side effects, like commas as thousands
El mié, 25-07-2012 a las 18:38 +0200, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
[...]
The single exception to this is IUSE, which
is required to be present in an ebuild even if it's empty. Maybe we
should drop this requirement, too.
+1
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
El lun, 23-07-2012 a las 15:08 -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
Il 23/07/2012 14:10, Peter Stuge ha scritto:
Did anyone report it upstream?
Not me ... because I wouldn't know which one to care about. The problem
with upstream is that you have what they call master that is not really
As explained at:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=284822
There are multiple issues with sys-apps/man that could be solved
switching to sys-apps/man-db instead, the problem is that the process
looks to be blocked by:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289884
After checking that bug
It has security bugs opened for a long time:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408507
Also, current version fails to build, and the same occurs while trying
to bump to the latest version:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421861
Help with this is needed, otherwise we will probably
Several packages are using it with the same sense (support connman),
maybe we should move it from local to global USEs, what do you think?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 21:06 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 07/08/2012 08:57 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:29:35 +0200
Pacho Ramospa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 21:49 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
Il 08/07/2012 20:13, Chí-Thanh
For a long time I have been observing ppc team reacts really slowly to
stabilization requests, causing us to need to keep old ebuilds for a
long time. Maybe it's time to start dropping stable keywords for ppc as
looks like team doesn't have enough man power to keep stable updated.
What do you
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 21:49 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
Il 08/07/2012 20:13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn ha scritto:
Please report a removal bug for this, so any issues concerning users of
netkit-tftp can be tracked.
Here it is:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425362
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 22:59 +0200, René Neumann escribió:
Am 08.07.2012 22:10, schrieb Michał Górny:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass
After reading:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424719
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397973
Looks like there is not consensus about how to handle this cases,
probably a PROPERTIES variable for this would help :-/
Any ideas on this kind of issue?
signature.asc
Description: This
El lun, 02-07-2012 a las 13:45 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 07/02/2012 01:36 PM, viv...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 02/07/2012 22:01, Zac Medico ha scritto:
On 07/02/2012 12:48 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 28-05-2012 a las 14:34 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
Hi,
In case you aren't familiar
El lun, 28-05-2012 a las 14:34 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
Hi,
In case you aren't familiar with FEATURES=userpriv, here's the
description from the make.conf(5) man page:
Allow portage to drop root privileges and compile packages as
portage:portage without a sandbox (unless usersandbox
I would like to discuss a bit more issues like:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423087
Even if there are a lot of packages that can cause this breakage when
downgraded, I think it should be prevented and package managers
shouldn't try to downgrade this kind of packages as they will later
El sáb, 30-06-2012 a las 13:17 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/06/12 11:16 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 30 June 2012 07:22:39 Zac Medico wrote:
On 06/30/2012 04:07 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I would like to discuss a bit more
El sáb, 30-06-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/06/12 01:30 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 30-06-2012 a las 13:17 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 30/06/12 11:16
El jue, 28-06-2012 a las 10:26 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:12:34 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The logic in prune_libtool_files is not perfect[1].
Define 'perfect'.
To clarify:
Use `prune_libtool_files --all` instead of plain
El jue, 21-06-2012 a las 08:39 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:25:10 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Then, looks clear to me that the way to get things approved in newer
EAPIs is not clear enough as looks like a lot of devs (like me) don't
know them
El jue, 21-06-2012 a las 19:15 +0800, Patrick Lauer escribió:
On 06/21/12 15:25, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 21-06-2012 a las 08:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:08:55 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Also, if I remember correctly, Tommy asked
El jue, 21-06-2012 a las 11:27 +0200, Alec Warner escribió:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El jue, 21-06-2012 a las 08:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:08:55 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Also, if I remember
El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 11:53 +0200, Peter Stuge escribió:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
What is hurting is people demanding features without specifying what
the problem is
Part of enabling progress is to show a strong will to communicate,
with the goal of extracting common understanding from
El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 12:24 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 11:53 +0200, Peter Stuge escribió:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
What is hurting is people demanding features without specifying what
the problem is
Part of enabling progress is to show a strong
El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 11:31 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:24:32 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
As Peter explains, I think it is now clear enough what I was demanding
(about clarifying what is needed to get things in next EAPI to prevent
issues like
El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 12:37 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:38:09 +0200
Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
If you don't understand something of what thus far has been written,
then why not ask specific questions to fill those gaps, and move on?
The multilib
El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 12:59 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 13:52:24 +0200
Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
bring this to the point where we can say something other than
huh?.
You can accelerate by making one guess about each thing on
El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 13:16 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:11:28 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Looks like you have now opted to use Brian's comment as a kind of
shield of similar and discuss only about multilib, even when this
thread was more general
El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 17:53 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:47:26 +0200
Justin j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 23.06.2012 18:17, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:13:23 +0200
Justin j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Did you read what you wrote and thought about
El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 18:30 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:23:57 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Did you send this proposal seriously or only to troll comparing it
with what you think tommy did with multilib thread?
Uhm, this proposal is exactly
El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 18:45 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:10 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will treat the
gtk3 version or the jruby version as being newer versions of
the gtk2 version
El mié, 20-06-2012 a las 23:43 +0200, Justin escribió:
On 20.06.2012 22:35, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:25:30 -0400
Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
Multilib (and/or multiarch) support
The current binaries cause a great deal of pain, particularly
when a user does
El jue, 21-06-2012 a las 08:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:08:55 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Also, if I remember correctly, Tommy asked for this some months ago,
you asked for what he sent some days ago and now you require more and
more work
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 22:36 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:49:10 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 19:07 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:30:55 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El sáb, 16-06
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 22:07 -0500, Dale escribió:
Duncan wrote:
Looking at the broader picture, the problem of extraneous packages in the
world file has always concerned me. If it were to be done over again,
and I think Zac would likely agree, emerge would use --oneshot by
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 22:10 +0200, Peter Stuge escribió:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
I guess the point is that it is not really a dependency.
No, it's a dependency only when you want ppp support working,
Logically, but not technically.
I like this separation; the package manager takes
The following packages are now orphan:
app-emulation/playonlinux
app-emulation/vboxgtk
dev-libs/xmlrpc-epi
dev-util/bam
media-libs/pnglite
media-video/miro
net-misc/plowshare
Feel free to get them
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
net-misc/balance
x11-themes/gentoo-artwork
Feel free to get them
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
app-admin/ulogd
app-arch/pdv
Feel free to get them
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello
I would like to know if there is some place where things going to be
included (or proposed to be included) for eapi5 are listed (if such
place exists). Currently, looks like there is no eapi5 tracker :-/
Thanks a lot for the info :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 13:13 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo escribió:
On Saturday 16 June 2012 12:55:22 Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
I would like to know if there is some place where things going to be
included (or proposed to be included) for eapi5 are listed (if such
place exists). Currently
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 14:12 +0200, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I would like to know if there is some place where things going to be
included (or proposed to be included) for eapi5 are listed (if such
place exists). Currently, looks like
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 13:43 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 14:26:16 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
OK, would you let me to create a tracker bug for eapi5 accepted item?
No. We're working on the PMS list. We don't need yet another place to
look.
About
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (16 Jun 2012)
# Bundles unsecure libexpat, all packages still needing it
# are dead, orphan and have replacements. See bug #251433.
# Removal in 30 days.
net-libs/libtlen
net-im/gnugadu
net-im/tleenx2
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (16 Jun 2012)
# Bundles python-2.3
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 14:48 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:37:44 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
About suggesting new item (like forcing rebuilding of other
packages as discussed some days ago and crosscompile support
suggested by Tommy today), I
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (16 Jun 2012)
# No needed since kernel-3.2, bug#411405#c6
# Removal in a month.
sys-kernel/cluster-sources
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 15:31 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:29:09 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I thought last Zac suggestion of ABI_SLOT modified to use
SLOT=ble/bla was clear enough and we reached a consensus.
Possibly. I'm waiting to see
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 15:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:48:20 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Regarding the comparison with using only SLOT, the most clear example
of how that solution was a bit worse was that glib vs
dbus-glib/gobject-introspection
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 17:16 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 15:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:48:20 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Regarding the comparison with using only SLOT, the most clear example
of how that solution
This was noticed recently when getting:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420569
Also hit this problem today while trying to bump bluez and noticed we
are using elog messages to tell people to manually install
net-dialup/ppp if they want ppp working with bluez.
I am unsure about the
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 18:09 +0200, hasufell escribió:
It breaks the useflag philosophy, IMO.
Useflags were meant as switches. You can turn things on and off. Pulling
in optional dependencies via useflags does not allow the user to turn
something off when he sets USE=-foo emerge fuqbar.
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 17:24 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:16:34 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 15:52 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:48:20 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Regarding
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 19:07 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:30:55 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 18:09 +0200, hasufell escribió:
It breaks the useflag philosophy, IMO.
Useflags were meant as switches. You can turn things
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 19:50 +0200, Peter Stuge escribió:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
Also hit this problem today while trying to bump bluez and noticed we
are using elog messages to tell people to manually install
net-dialup/ppp if they want ppp working with bluez.
I am unsure about
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 20:55 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On 06/16/2012 06:59 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
This was noticed recently when getting:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420569
Also hit this problem today while trying to bump bluez and noticed we
are using elog messages
El sáb, 16-06-2012 a las 17:46 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:41:51 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
The :*/:= feature was designed to solve one specific problem: if a
user has foo installed, and foo deps upon bar, and bar:1 is
installed, and the user
El vie, 15-06-2012 a las 05:43 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On 06/15/2012 05:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 14 June 2012 21:16:31 Samuli Suominen wrote:
So how about renaming USE=gs consumers to USE=ps and making USE=ps
global flag with the proposed description?
merging is
El mar, 12-06-2012 a las 23:02 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
i've noticed a growing trend where people put setup of variables into
pkg_setup that only matter to src_* funcs presumably so they don't have to
call the respective src_* func from an inherited eclass. unfortunately this
adds
El vie, 15-06-2012 a las 09:03 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El mar, 12-06-2012 a las 23:02 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
i've noticed a growing trend where people put setup of variables into
pkg_setup that only matter to src_* funcs presumably so they don't have to
call the respective
El lun, 11-06-2012 a las 18:08 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:15:40 +0100
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:45:27 +0100
Nirbheek Chauhan
El dom, 10-06-2012 a las 11:45 +0300, Maxim Kammerer escribió:
Just to illustrate the USE=gtk3 confusion, on packages I has personal
experience with:
[...]
gnome-base/librsvg
-- flag for gtk3 libraries *and* executables (independent USE=gtk; an
example of a package that should be slotted?)
El dom, 10-06-2012 a las 13:25 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:55:53 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
A dependency atom will have optional SLOT and ABI_SLOT parts. Using
the dbus-glib depedency on glib:2 as an example [1], the dbus-glib
dependency will be
Hello
Is anyone familiarized with lirc? Due all their opened bugs:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=lirclist_id=1087335
and, specially:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160134
that is also affecting 0.9, all lirc versions in the tree are broken for
a long time.
Thanks!
El vie, 08-06-2012 a las 12:31 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/08/2012 12:23 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El vie, 08-06-2012 a las 12:16 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/08/2012 01:38 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 12:33 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/07/2012 12:24 PM
El sáb, 09-06-2012 a las 12:46 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El vie, 08-06-2012 a las 12:31 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/08/2012 12:23 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El vie, 08-06-2012 a las 12:16 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/08/2012 01:38 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 07-06-2012
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 12:33 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/07/2012 12:24 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 12:09 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/07/2012 12:00 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 19:44 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012
As talked with him via mail, he will concentrate in gnome work and won't
have time to take care of the following packages:
app-admin/logrotate
sys-apps/usermode-utilities
Feel free to get them
Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
As talked with him via mail, thanks for taking it
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
El vie, 08-06-2012 a las 12:16 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/08/2012 01:38 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 12:33 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/07/2012 12:24 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 12:09 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/07/2012 12:00 PM
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 14:59 -0700, Brian Harring escribió:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:18:01PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 18:40 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 09:43:32 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can imagine that ABI_SLOT operator deps will be a lot more popular
than SLOT operator deps, since ABI_SLOT operator deps will accommodate
the common
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 10:42 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/06/2012 10:28 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:21:40 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
You'd have a slot per ABI, and be encouraged to allow multiple
versions of glib to be installed in parallel. If
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 20:04 +0200, Wulf C. Krueger escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07.06.2012 19:47, Zac Medico wrote:
And, I suspect that they'd be handling with ABI_SLOT operator deps,
if they were available.
No, we wouldn't.
Best regards, Wulf
Talk
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 11:03 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/07/2012 10:40 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 09:43:32 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can imagine that ABI_SLOT operator deps will be a lot more popular
than SLOT operator deps, since ABI_SLOT
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 20:16 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 11:03 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/07/2012 10:40 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 09:43:32 -0700
Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can imagine that ABI_SLOT operator deps
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 19:44 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:43:54 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I would prefer, as a workaround, allow reverse deps to RDEPEND on
glib:2.* instead. That way it would cover more cases when more than
two slots
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 12:09 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/07/2012 12:00 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 07-06-2012 a las 19:44 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:43:54 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I would prefer, as a workaround, allow reverse deps
After reading:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419795
I think that would be interesting to try to not get grep build with pcre
support by default, specially after reading man grep and seeing that
its support is tagged as experimental:
-P, --perl-regexp
Interpret
El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 16:07 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/05/2012 06:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 08:44 -0400, Aaron W. Swenson escribió:
The ideal solution is for the Ebuild to instruct the PMS to rebuild
the dependent packages.
We can have a variable
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 06:33 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:31:01 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
We all know what would be the ideal solution, the problem is how to
implement it (and how many years we need to wait to get it working).
We do? Please
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 02:51 +0200, Michael Weber escribió:
[...]
[1] if you forget the -X on module-rebuild, you might no longer have
the virtualbox-modules version installed in the tree (no packages
satisfy ...). virtualbox does remove old versions real quick.
The fun part comes with
El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 19:18 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken packages
with tests)?
I'd suggest a special ebuild phase to check
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 10:37 +0200, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. escribió:
On 6/6/12 10:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
After reading:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419795
I think that would be interesting to try to not get grep build with pcre
support by default, specially after reading
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 01:54 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2012 01:46 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 19:18 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
Is there any chance to detect
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 02:17 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 06/06/2012 01:28 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 16:07 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
The SLOT operator dependencies that Ciaran has been advocating are
very close to a good solution. However, if we want it to work
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 18:16 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:48:26 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
That looks nice, only two notes:
- Looks like would be more sense on distinguish between SLOT and
ABI_SLOT, for example:
* dbus-glib would rdepend
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 18:19 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:32:08 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
We do? Please tell us. I was under the impression that we still
didn't fully know what the problem was.
Well, could you please let me know how
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 13:23 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 04:26:11 Pacho Ramos wrote:
I think that would be interesting to try to not get grep build with pcre
support by default, specially after reading man grep and seeing that
its support is tagged
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 19:15 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 20:02:24 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Probably other gnome team could reply this better than me, but I don't
think slotting every glib-2 due ABI changes deserves the huge effort.
Think
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 19:33 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 20:30:52 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Also, how could this be handled in dbus-glib side? I mean, would
we need to update dbus-glib update from RDEPENDing on glib:2.30 to
glib:2.32? :O
El mié, 06-06-2012 a las 14:53 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 14:06:47 Pacho Ramos wrote:
The problem is that grep keeps linked against libpcre and it can cause
problems like pointed in referred bug report, and it's really risky as
people can have their portage
801 - 900 of 1260 matches
Mail list logo
