On Saturday, April 2, 2016 8:01:39 PM CEST, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 12:35:58PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:36:56PM +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Friday, April 1, 2016 8:33:02 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote: ...
No, it wouldn't. We made a
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 12:35:58PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:36:56PM +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Friday, April 1, 2016 8:33:02 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On 01 Apr 2016 20:00, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > >> On Friday, April 1, 2016 3:58:18 AM CEST,
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:36:56PM +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Friday, April 1, 2016 8:33:02 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 01 Apr 2016 20:00, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >> On Friday, April 1, 2016 3:58:18 AM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> ...
> >>> "being supported" != "enabled by
On Friday, April 1, 2016 8:33:02 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 01 Apr 2016 20:00, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Friday, April 1, 2016 3:58:18 AM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
...
"being supported" != "enabled by default". so no, i still don't see any
requirement in anything you've cited that
On 01 Apr 2016 20:00, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Friday, April 1, 2016 3:58:18 AM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> ...
> >> lemme look it up for you then:
> >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Council_decisions
> >>
> >> systems with separate /usr should be supported. However, users
> >> shouldn't
On Friday, April 1, 2016 3:58:18 AM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
...
lemme look it up for you then:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Council_decisions
systems with separate /usr should be supported. However, users
shouldn't be
constrained from using software which doesn't support that. -- 04/2012
On 31 Mar 2016 21:09, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thursday, March 31, 2016 8:19:52 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 31 Mar 2016 19:00, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >> On Thursday, March 31, 2016 6:07:28 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> On 31 Mar 2016 16:05, Alexis Ballier wrote: ...
> >>
> >>
On 31 Mar 2016 21:13, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thursday, March 31, 2016 8:20:45 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 31 Mar 2016 19:03, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >> On Thursday, March 31, 2016 6:08:52 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> On 31 Mar 2016 10:12, Mike Gilbert wrote: ...
> >>
> >>
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 8:20:45 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 31 Mar 2016 19:03, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 6:08:52 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 31 Mar 2016 10:12, Mike Gilbert wrote: ...
unless you symlink /bin to /usr/bin, moving binaries around has
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 8:19:52 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 31 Mar 2016 19:00, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 6:07:28 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 31 Mar 2016 16:05, Alexis Ballier wrote: ...
i dont think anybody expects you to post tree-wide conversion
On 31 Mar 2016 19:03, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thursday, March 31, 2016 6:08:52 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 31 Mar 2016 10:12, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Mike Frysinger
> >> wrote: ...
> >
> > i think we can scope it currently for
On 31 Mar 2016 19:00, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thursday, March 31, 2016 6:07:28 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 31 Mar 2016 16:05, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >> On Thursday, March 31, 2016 1:58:19 AM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> All ebuilds that call gen_usr_ldscript today will migrate
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 6:08:52 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 31 Mar 2016 10:12, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Mike Frysinger
wrote: ...
i think we can scope it currently for libs (and any data files they need),
but i don't see it being a bad
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 6:07:28 PM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 31 Mar 2016 16:05, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 1:58:19 AM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
All ebuilds that call gen_usr_ldscript today will migrate to this and
will allow people to move away from installing
On 31 Mar 2016 10:12, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > To make forward progress on bug 417451, introduce a new sep-usr eclass
> > that will hold all logic related to having a separate /usr. For now,
> > this is just the
On 31 Mar 2016 16:05, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thursday, March 31, 2016 1:58:19 AM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > All ebuilds that call gen_usr_ldscript today will migrate to this and
> > will allow people to move away from installing things into /. For the
> > systems that want to have a
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> To make forward progress on bug 417451, introduce a new sep-usr eclass
> that will hold all logic related to having a separate /usr. For now,
> this is just the gen_usr_ldscript function and a new USE=sep-usr flag.
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 1:58:19 AM CEST, Mike Frysinger wrote:
To make forward progress on bug 417451, introduce a new sep-usr eclass
that will hold all logic related to having a separate /usr. For now,
this is just the gen_usr_ldscript function and a new USE=sep-usr flag.
Good idea,
To make forward progress on bug 417451, introduce a new sep-usr eclass
that will hold all logic related to having a separate /usr. For now,
this is just the gen_usr_ldscript function and a new USE=sep-usr flag.
All ebuilds that call gen_usr_ldscript today will migrate to this and
will allow
19 matches
Mail list logo