Hi Alec,
On 27.01.2018 22:58, Alec Warner wrote:
> > I noticed that we have 7 packages on Fedora wallpapers with names that
> > only explain themselves to Fedora insiders:
>
> So traditionally we follow upstream package naming. If we aim to
> deviate, I'd prefer we have strong reasons
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 01/27/2018 11:09 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > I noticed that we have 7 packages on Fedora wallpapers with names that
> > only explain themselves to Fedora insiders:
>
So traditionally we follow
On 27.01.2018 19:06, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> 11-solar
> 12-constantine
> 13-goddard
> 14-laughlin
> 15-lovelock
> 16-verne
Correction:
10-solar
11-leonidas
12-constantine
13-goddard
14-laughlin
15-lovelock
16-verne
Hi,
On 27.01.2018 17:32, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> If you do merge them, then it might be better to use flags for the
> different sub-packages rather than slots. There's no place to describe
> what a slot is for, but having a local USE=solar with a corresponding
> description in metadata.xml is
On 01/27/2018 11:09 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> I noticed that we have 7 packages on Fedora wallpapers with names that
> only explain themselves to Fedora insiders:
>
> ...
>
> I was thinking that we could merge these packages into a new package
> "x11-themes/fedora-backgrounds"
Hi!
I noticed that we have 7 packages on Fedora wallpapers with names that
only explain themselves to Fedora insiders:
# eix background | fgrep -B3 Fedora
* x11-themes/constantine-backgrounds
Available versions: 12.1.1.4-r1
Homepage: