Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10/10/15 14:25, hasufell wrote: > On 10/10/2015 02:24 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: >> On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote: +RDEPEND=" + !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0 ) + libressl? ( dev-libs/libressl ) + sys-libs/zlib + net-libs/http-parser >>> Please

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:30:32 -0400 as excerpted: > I don't think it is a bad thing if you wanted to publish the top-5 > issues of the week/month/etc on the lists or something useful for > general education/improvement. The key is to keep the general relevance > of the lists

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10.10.2015 16:15, hasufell wrote: > On 10/10/2015 03:54 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: >> >> Dear Julian, >> >> avoiding this mailing list for further reviews is great news. >> Still, I'd like to opt-out from receiving any mails arising from project >> "Reviewers". >> If there are QA-related issues

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10/10/15 9:25 AM, hasufell wrote: As you might know, I haven't really reviewed much on dev ML either, until people started ranting about our Social Contract, how github is against it and that everything must be public on our own infra channels. To be clear, I like your "small" reviews on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 18:59:22 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:43:29 -0700 > Alec Warner wrote: > > I don't see why someone could not write an 'ebuild vet' or 'ebuild > > fmt' tool; it doesn't have to start as a strict

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10/10/2015 03:54 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: > > Dear Julian, > > avoiding this mailing list for further reviews is great news. > Still, I'd like to opt-out from receiving any mails arising from project > "Reviewers". > If there are QA-related issues with packages, I maintain, please file a > bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/10/2015 04:30 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:15 AM, hasufell > wrote: >> >> Nevertheless, we'll try to continue, reduce public noise and keep >> the reviews useful. >> > > Bugs would probably be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:43:29 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > I don't see why someone could not write an 'ebuild vet' or 'ebuild > fmt' tool; it doesn't have to start as a strict component of repoman > at all (although ideally it ends up there to be run automatically.) Parsing bash

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 14:24:28 +0200 > Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote: > > > > +RDEPEND=" > > > > + !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0 ) > > > > + libressl? (

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10.10.2015 15:25, hasufell wrote: > On 10/10/2015 03:14 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: >> >> Dear Michał, >> >> first of all, please stick to the truth. >> >> In #gentoo-dev: >> mrueg: as i pointed out, it was because i see it in pull >> requests and gentoo developers are teaching bad practices to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:15 AM, hasufell wrote: > > Nevertheless, we'll try to continue, reduce public noise and keep the > reviews useful. > Bugs would probably be helpful from the standpoint that they also are a mechanism to keep track of whether the issue was corrected.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 14:24:28 +0200 Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote: > > > +RDEPEND=" > > > + !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0 ) > > > + libressl? ( dev-libs/libressl ) > > > + sys-libs/zlib > > > + net-libs/http-parser > > > > Please order

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:43:29 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Brian Dolbec > wrote: > > > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 14:24:28 +0200 > > Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > > > On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:32:01 +0200 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 10/10/2015 04:30 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:15 AM, hasufell > > wrote: > >> > >> Nevertheless, we'll try to

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

Dnia 2015-10-10, o godz. 11:31:45 "Manuel Rüger" napisał(a): > commit: 9d15a1c12b3c4f98445a45c051733eb2a67fdb28 > Author: Manuel Rüger gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Sat Oct 10 11:30:54 2015 + > Commit: Manuel Rüger gentoo org> > CommitDate: Sat Oct 10 11:30:54

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote: > > +RDEPEND=" > > + !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0 ) > > + libressl? ( dev-libs/libressl ) > > + sys-libs/zlib > > + net-libs/http-parser > > Please order deps alphabetically (I know I added libressl without > reordering, but that was just

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10/10/2015 01:31 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: > commit: 9d15a1c12b3c4f98445a45c051733eb2a67fdb28 > Author: Manuel Rüger gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Sat Oct 10 11:30:54 2015 + > Commit: Manuel Rüger gentoo org> > CommitDate: Sat Oct 10 11:30:54 2015 + > URL:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10/10/2015 02:24 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote: >>> +RDEPEND=" >>> + !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0 ) >>> + libressl? ( dev-libs/libressl ) >>> + sys-libs/zlib >>> + net-libs/http-parser >> >> Please order deps alphabetically (I know I added

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015, 14:25:28 schrieb hasufell: > > >> Please order deps alphabetically (I know I added libressl without > >> reordering, but that was just to keep the diff as small as possible). > > > > Is this a policy > > It is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10/10/2015 02:37 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 14:25:28 +0200 > hasufell wrote: > >> On 10/10/2015 02:24 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: >>> On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote: > +RDEPEND=" > + !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0 ) > +

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

Dnia 2015-10-10, o godz. 13:51:34 Michał Górny napisał(a): > Dnia 2015-10-10, o godz. 11:31:45 > "Manuel Rüger" napisał(a): > > > commit: 9d15a1c12b3c4f98445a45c051733eb2a67fdb28 > > Author: Manuel Rüger gentoo org> > > AuthorDate: Sat Oct 10

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10.10.2015 14:55, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-10-10, o godz. 13:51:34 > Michał Górny napisał(a): > >> Dnia 2015-10-10, o godz. 11:31:45 >> "Manuel Rüger" napisał(a): >> >>> commit: 9d15a1c12b3c4f98445a45c051733eb2a67fdb28 >>> Author: Manuel

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libgit2/

On 10/10/2015 03:14 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote: > > Dear Michał, > > first of all, please stick to the truth. > > In #gentoo-dev: > mrueg: as i pointed out, it was because i see it in pull > requests and gentoo developers are teaching bad practices to new recruits > mgorny: please don't CC me in