Re: [gentoo-ppc-user] Issue with blocked ebuilds

2005-02-16 Thread Ben Ricker
So if I understadn what you are saying, I need to emerge the latest versions of the blocked builds and then the blocks will be gone? Or do I remove the blocked ebuilds and then recompile them later (or they will be built on the emerge -u world)? Ben Ricker On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:41:49 +0100

[gentoo-user] Sandbox error on Redhat-Artwork

2003-07-28 Thread Ben Ricker
I do not have sandbox setup in my make.conf. It is commented out: #FEATURES=sandbox buildpkg ccache distcc userpriv usersandbox notitles noclean noauto cvs keeptemp keepwork Any ideas? Should I submit a bug report? Ben

Re: [gentoo-user] Sandbox error on Redhat-Artwork

2003-07-28 Thread Ben Ricker
Thanks for the suggestion. I did it two ways: adding the FEATURES from command line and editing make.conf and adding the line FEATURES=sandbox, I still get the same error! Ben Ricker Wellinx.com On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 09:32, Panard wrote: Le Lundi 28 Juillet 2003 16:10, Ben Ricker a écrit

[gentoo-user] Problem with blocked ebuilds

2003-07-24 Thread Ben Ricker
-perl/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.05-r6 package conflicts with this package and both can't be installed on the same system together. How do I get rid of those blocked packages. How does it conflict with mozilla? Or is it talking about another package? Btw, I am using ~x86. Ben Ricker -- [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with blocked ebuilds

2003-07-24 Thread Ben Ricker
I forgot to mention that I had tried that and perl will not even update. It fails with the same error. Ben Ricker On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 11:12, Ian Truelsen wrote: On 24 Jul 2003 10:38:18 -0500 Ben Ricker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [blocks B] dev-perl/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.05-r6 (from

[gentoo-user] Problems upgrading base-layout

2003-06-18 Thread Ben Ricker
See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21663 for the bug. Has anyone had this problem with upgrading base-layout? There has been no movement on a fix in a couple of days and I need to upgrade some software ASAP. Base-layout seems to be a dependency for every ebuild out there. Ben Ricker

Re: [gentoo-user] Which java-sdk?

2003-06-06 Thread Ben Ricker
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 11:32, Ing. Bernardo Lopez O. wrote: Its a kind of chat server (not ircd... but kind of) its for a server whit 1.4ghz 256ram Check out http://www.volano.com/benchmarks.html for benchmarks on different platforms. Ben Ricker Wellinx.com On Thursday 05 June 2003 15:35

Re: [gentoo-user] Which java-sdk?

2003-06-06 Thread Ben Ricker
in the dark. I do not know exactly why that is the case. Ben Ricker Wellinx.com On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 11:01, Richard Kilgore wrote: On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 05:32:19PM +0200, Gwendolyn van der Linden wrote: Has anyone ever heard why the JVMs out there always lose to their Windows counterparts

[gentoo-user] Error compiling ck r4 kernel source

2003-03-19 Thread Ben Ricker
]: *** [sys.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/kernel' make[1]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/kernel' make: *** [_dir_kernel] Error 2 The full compile and the .config are attached. Any ideas? Ben Ricker -- Ben Ricker [EMAIL

[gentoo-user] Re: Error compiling ck r4 kernel source

2003-03-19 Thread Ben Ricker
I forgot to attach the .config. It is in this email. Ben Ricker On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 11:45, Ben Ricker wrote: I keep getting an error when compiling the build ck-sources-2.4.20-r4. The error is: In file included from sys.c:7: /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-ck4/include/linux/module.h: In function

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gnome 2.2 breaks Evolution 1.2.2?

2003-03-13 Thread Ben Ricker
I submitted a bug report: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17396 The problem was solved by rebuilding gtkhtml and evolution: 'emerge gtkhtml evolution' Ben Ricker On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 12:39, Spundun Bhatt wrote: I had a similar problem but at that time I thought the culprit

[gentoo-user] Gnome 2.2 breaks Evolution 1.2.2?

2003-03-12 Thread Ben Ricker
funky versioning). Anyway, I can no longer send emails because the gtkhtml component dies an ignominious death. Has anyone had this problem? Could I slot gtkhtml? I would doubt it. Anyway know a workaround? Shoudl I file a bug report? Ben Ricker Wellinx.com -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Gnome 2.2 breaks Evolution 1.2.2?

2003-03-12 Thread Ben Ricker
the second recompile, it still cannot initialize gtkhtml, gal, libgtkhtml. Do I have to give some command line arguments? Ben Ricker Wellinx.com On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 10:45, Ben Ricker wrote: I upgrade to the latest Gnome 2 (2.2-r2) and the latest Evolution (1.2.2). The problem, it seems

[gentoo-user] Re: Gnome 2.2 breaks Evolution 1.2.2?

2003-03-12 Thread Ben Ricker
) afterwards. Today, I just recompiled Evolution. No joy. Ben Ricker -- About to post a bug on bugs.gentoo.org On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 12:31, Ben Ricker wrote: Kurt Bechstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I had the same problem and just recompiled evolution against the new version of gtkhtml, gal

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Opinion Poll: KDE Vs Gnome

2003-03-06 Thread Ben Ricker
that tips the scale towards one or the other, I can say that, as an educated guess, it is most probably not in the threading implementation of the respective thread libraries. Others have brought up more important issues (i.e., ease-of-use, memory hogginess, etc.). Ben Ricker -- Ben Ricker [EMAIL