Re: [gentoo-user] decent browser?

2003-07-21 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >So, I was wondering if people could recommend some good browsers. I'm >> running fluxbox, so I don't need anything fancy. The only reason I was >> running Galeon was because I really, really dig the tabs and the google, >> freshmeat and dictionary quickstart links (what

[gentoo-user] Good code editor (with colors) for X (no GTK or QT)

2003-07-21 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
Anyone know of a good code editor for X that doesn't use GTK or QT? I would like something that displays colors (like for variables, etc). I also don't want to use vi or any deritive or any console based editor. Any thoughts? nathaniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Good code editor (with colors) for X (no GTK or QT)

2003-07-21 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I use emacs. (I know, I know, I can hear all of you vi people out there >snickering) > > Brian Is emacs an X app? Or console based? Nathaniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] decent browser?

2003-07-21 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >If you want something fast use dillo, it lacks some features (frames, >javascript, ...) but IMO the fastest browser available. Well, I definately want frames and javascript. Someone gave me this laptop to use and I want to use it for coding and a road machine... Nathan

Re: [gentoo-user] Good code editor (with colors) for X (no GTK or QT)

2003-07-22 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>Ok i've tried to keep quiet but i cant anymore!! >> >>Why dont you want to use vim? You cant type? That's the only reason i can >>think of. Other than that... its power editing all the way. >> >>sory... i couldn't help myself :D >> >>Essien I can type just fine :).

[gentoo-user] Python on the liveCD

2003-07-23 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
GLIS is pondering a rewrite in python (adding GUI for the X liveCDs). The question is, why isn't python on the liveCD? Is it feasable to get it included? Nathaniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Xargs error on boot new installation.

2003-07-24 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> If updating >> baselayout is supposed to fix the bug, just wondering why it didnnn't >work >> for me. Any suggestions as to what else I might do. Thanks for anything. > >Check date on /etc/init.d/bootmisc. Perhaps you forget to update some >files >after upgrading? I h

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Light Linux Laptop?

2003-07-24 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
My p233 took 2 days just to bootstrap :) Nathaniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-05 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >In this case perhaps using the good old "dialog" tool might be an >alternative to writing a complete curses UI? > >For KDE there exists a complementary tool "kdialog", perhaps this could >be converted into a Qt-only version - so you could use it in the same >way as the "

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-06 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >ncurses would be great though Just to be clear, GLIS already has (kind of) a ncurses interface. However, I think that the interface will be divorced from the install script. Does anyone have any interest in helping with that? (IE, designing a new ncurses interface?) Na

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-06 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Sure, this sound nice, so the goal is to make something really fine - not >to get a usable solution quickly? > >In this case why do you think about a bash script backend instead of a >nice little C (or C++) program? Since we are talking about a Gentoo >installer - not a

[gentoo-user] 1.4_final CFLAGS Generation?

2003-08-06 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
I'm just wondering. This is the announcement from www.gentoo.org: "1.4 includes automated kernel builds, CFLAGS generation, the Gentoo Reference Platform, and support for netless installation." Where/how is/do you do the CFLAGS generation!? Nathaniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-11 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >In this case why do you think about a bash script backend instead of a >nice little C (or C++) program? Since we are talking about a Gentoo >installer - not a platform independent thingie - we can safely assume >that the needed libraries for a real program are there, so

[gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-11 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
Want to work on a project that hundreds (thousands hopefully) will use? GLIS (Gentoo Linux Install Script) is looking for a GUI programmer to write a custom frontend for Gentoo's installer. If you fit the bill and are interested, please email me :) Thanks! nathaniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] maili

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-11 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Despite my previous post I have decided to take a look at learning a >little of >ncurses. My only concern with jumping in a creating a version of the >script >is that we will end up duplicating work. What we could do with is a C >library of functions for doing the 'b

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-11 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Also, why not python? I know that RedHat's installer (anaconda) is in >python, and it is pretty nice... Is it possible to package a python interpreter with the script itself? All in all, I'm leaning towards C/C++... Nathaniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-14 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >correct me if this isnt the case with the new live cds (still using an >rc1 disc myself), but there is no portage on the livecds either. > >There is portage and python in the stage balls, but that isnt on the >install cd in a usable form. correct! Nathaniel -- [EMAI

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-14 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
Karl-Heinz Zimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I wonder if there might be an error on it: What is "Thilosophy"? It is the branch of epistemology that answers the questions: "What is typing correctly and how do we know when we have done it?" :) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-14 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Well a project of this ambition is going to take a while to write >anyways.. I >dont think we should look at release cycles as obstacles standing in the >way, >and instead Do It Right (tm) even if it takes more time. > >The best solution seems to me to be what someone a

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-14 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I would also highly recommend going with qt.. if X is a problem, then >qt-embedded or qt with directfb might be an option Is it possible to use qt with just the tools that are included on the liveCD? Nathaniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] 1.4_final CFLAGS Generation?

2003-08-14 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Well, that program looks rather dull ... arch and -O3 pipe ... big deal :) >What about C++ optimizations such as -fmemoize-lookups and -fsave-memoized >??? I'll speek up in defense of the developers (whoever those mythical creatures are), they are not at version 1.0 yet

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-14 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Apparently neither you nor Dhruba have seen the kde-gnome LiveCDs. All of >the >1.4 release CDs have X (afaik, of course, since I haven't actually used >one) >with the exception of the "basic" ones. I am using "x86-1.4-20030803-cd1.iso" to install right now, and it has

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-14 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >What would be better is something with switchable front-ends: curses, qt, >gtk, >whatever. This is exactly what I would like to do. As of now I would really like to concentrate on console, as there is no X on the 1.4 liveCD (and I don't anticipate it soon). I'm not re

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-14 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Well I dont think we should limit this project just to what is CURRENTLY >on >the LiveCD... if we need more libs, why not just add them to the LiveCD? Because then we have to wait on release cycles to implement what we want. Personally, I think that if we are going to d

Re: [gentoo-user] distcc questions

2003-08-14 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
I'd like to vote that a distcc howto get some space in the official install documentation... Lots of people are using it, and there is a lot of confusion (and wrong information) on how to use it. Just do a search on google for "distcc gentoo" and you'll find lots of ways that don't work. Plus mo

Re: [gentoo-user] Wanted: GUI programmer (GLIS)

2003-08-14 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Well given that gentoo will always have python on their install cds is >that another alternative? Python is not on the liveCD. Nathaniel -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-user] S3 Savage and OpenGL?

2003-08-29 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
Is there a way to get opengl to work with a S3 Savage? Thanks! -- Nathaniel McCallum [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://glis.sourceforge.net -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Progress bars??

2004-02-03 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 19:15, gabriel wrote: > On February 3, 2004 04:43 pm, _JusSx_ wrote: > > if you wonna see progress bars, forget linux and start using windows. > > 'comon. the whole point to linux is to be able to control your own computer. > if this guy wants progress bars (and while some

Re: [gentoo-user] Progress bars??

2004-02-03 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 20:56, gabriel wrote: > On February 03, 2004 08:51 pm, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > > We could however provide a total emerge progress bar based on package > > size. Basically what this would do is get the size of the package and > > generate a per packag

[gentoo-user] Gnome desktop menu, "Disks" option, capitalization

2004-02-06 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
Ok, if you just have a floppy drive and cdrom drive and you right click on the gnome desktop and choose "Disks" you see listed "Floppy" and "CD-ROM" (notice capitalization). If you have more devices than that (like I do), the capitalization gets screwy. For instance, my list looks like this: Flo

[gentoo-user] mapping hostname to a non routable ip addy

2003-12-05 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
OK, here is the scenario. Gentoo router has one routable ip and the internal network is nat'ed. The routable ip has a domain that resolves to it, lets call it foobar.com. Internally (non-routable ips), there are hosts (FQDN=host1.foobar.com,host2.foobar.com). Is there anyway (perhaps iptable

Re: [gentoo-user] mapping hostname to a non routable ip addy

2003-12-05 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Dec 5, 2003, at 5:39 PM, Marius Mauch wrote: On 12/05/03 Nathaniel McCallum wrote: OK, here is the scenario. Gentoo router has one routable ip and the internal network is nat'ed. The routable ip has a domain that resolves to it, lets call it foobar.com. Internally (non-routabl

Re: [gentoo-user] mapping hostname to a non routable ip addy

2003-12-05 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Dec 5, 2003, at 6:12 PM, mathieu perrenoud wrote: On Friday 05 December 2003 23:46, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: On Dec 5, 2003, at 5:39 PM, Marius Mauch wrote: On 12/05/03 Nathaniel McCallum wrote: OK, here is the scenario. Gentoo router has one routable ip and the internal network is nat&#x

Re: [gentoo-user] mapping hostname to a non routable ip addy

2003-12-05 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Dec 5, 2003, at 11:19 PM, Jeff Smelser wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 05 December 2003 10:15 pm, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: What about for ssh? Any way to do it for that? Or will it consider that a "man in the middle" attack? You can forward any por

Re: [gentoo-user] GLIS for dummies

2003-11-09 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On 11/9/03 10:08 PM, "brian connolly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bottom line: Gentoo's reputation is good... but definitely hampered by what > is generally regarded as a difficult install. You know that. > > Now rather than do something, per se, the typical OS dev will point to > various refer