Re: [gentoo-user] can't reach www.gentoo.org

2003-09-18 Thread el lodger
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:43:59 -0600 Fred Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > el lodger wrote: > > >Just got home from work and tried to get to www.gentoo.org using MF. > >Verisign pops up saying they couldn't find the site. "There is no Web > >site at th

[gentoo-user] can't reach www.gentoo.org

2003-09-18 Thread el lodger
Just got home from work and tried to get to www.gentoo.org using MF. Verisign pops up saying they couldn't find the site. "There is no Web site at this address." I can get to the forums and anywhere else but I can't get home. Anyone else having any problems reaching the site? Thanks, lodger -- Po

Re: [gentoo-user] where are the gentoo-user mailing list archives???

2003-09-14 Thread el lodger
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 19:20:45 +0200 Renat Golubchyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > On Sunday 14 September 2003 18:08, Norberto Bensa wrote: > > Renat Golubchyk wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > On Sunday 14 September 2003 07:42, momesana wrote: > > > > Can anybody tell me where to find the archiv

Re: [gentoo-user] nano-1.2.2 strange output

2003-08-24 Thread el lodger
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 06:08:22 -0700 el lodger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After upgrading to portage-2.0.49 I ran etc-update and then tried to > edit make.conf with nano. Nano produced some blinking blocks of text > that said something like "painting line 1 new line is".

[gentoo-user] nano-1.2.2 strange output

2003-08-24 Thread el lodger
After upgrading to portage-2.0.49 I ran etc-update and then tried to edit make.conf with nano. Nano produced some blinking blocks of text that said something like "painting line 1 new line is". This is not verbatim as I exited nano immediately. Konsole then showed the following: bash-2.05b$ nano -

Re: [gentoo-user] Strange error

2003-08-08 Thread el lodger
On 05 Aug 2003 17:14:59 -0700 Spundun Bhatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 16:21, Yeechie Tu wrote: > > Calculating world dependencies \ > > !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-libs/db-4.1" have been > > masked.!!!(dependency required by "net-nds/openldap-2.1.22" > >

Re: [gentoo-user] perl emerge problems

2003-07-29 Thread el lodger
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 04:29:52 +0200 Alberto Bert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've update perl but emerge don't want do it. > > bash-2.05b# emerge -pv perl > > These are the packages that I would merge, in order: > > Calculating dependencies ...done! > [blocks B] dev-lang/perl-5.8.

Re: [gentoo-user] Q: "emerge sync" or "emerge rsync"

2003-07-29 Thread el lodger
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:20:43 -0500 Steven Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the difference between "emerge sync" and "emerge rsync"? > > I've read that several people use "emerge sync" but I always do > "emerge rsync" according to the older x86 Install docs. None. -- Powered by GENTOO

Re: [gentoo-user] Keymap not loading

2003-07-29 Thread el lodger
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:46:18 +0100 Dhruba Bandopadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > el lodger wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:24:24 + > > Dan Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Hot Diggety! Richard Kilgore was rumored to have

Re: [gentoo-user] Keymap not loading

2003-07-29 Thread el lodger
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:24:24 + Dan Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hot Diggety! Richard Kilgore was rumored to have written: > > > > You could try re-emerging kbd, and if that doesn't help, try > > running the command: > > > > # strace -fF -o log loadkeys uk > > Better yet: > > # s

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge chrash during update of dev-perl/PDL

2003-07-27 Thread el lodger
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:13:38 +0200 Frank Hellmuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > dev-perl/PDL > selected: 2.4.0 >protected: 2.4.0-r1 > omitted: none > > >>> Packages in red are slated for removal. > >>> Packages in green will not be removed. > > [...] > > <<

Re: [gentoo-user] Nspluginscan doesn't exist (even if compiled with+motif)

2003-07-24 Thread el lodger
> strange...same USE, more or less, but the which doesn't find > anything... try using locate nspluginscan -- Powered by GENTOO LINUX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] prevent downgrade

2003-07-09 Thread el lodger
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 20:51:08 -0600 Brian Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I create package.unmask and add this line to it (trying to prevent > downgrade of pan): > > >=net-news/pan-0.14.0 > > and then I do: > > # emerge -Duvlp world try emerge -DUvlp world --upgradeonly (-U short option)

[gentoo-user] bugzilla error message

2003-07-05 Thread el lodger
I know gentoo had some problems recently with buzzilla but I thought all was OK now. When I go to the opening page and click on - View Bugs Reported Today - I get this error message - " is not a legal date The quotation mark seems to have slipped into whatever program bugz is using. Anyone els

Re: [gentoo-user] best way to stop setiathome

2003-07-01 Thread el lodger
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 20:44:05 + (DST) Simon Mushi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I'd like to know what the best way is to safely stop the setiathome > application. Because I can kill it very easily... but very often some > locks is not removed .. hence the next time I start

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-dev] donations to what?

2003-06-29 Thread el lodger
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 18:35:05 -0600 Daniel Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can send checks made out to "Gentoo Technologies, Inc.": > > Daniel Robbins > Gentoo Technologies, Inc. > 205 Tulane SE > Albuquerque, NM 87106 > > Just a note -- all funds help, but don't feel obligated to send

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-dev] donations to what?

2003-06-28 Thread el lodger
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 02:05:42 +0300 Janne Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I see it, a good distribution is worth supporting, both getting > involved and financially. I don't care if gentoo was for-profit and > even profitable. Gentoo just happens to be the best distribution out > there(fo

Re: Fw: Re: [gentoo-user] /bin is gone

2003-05-29 Thread el lodger
On Wed, 28 May 2003 10:05:44 -0700 el lodger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Begin forwarded message: > > Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 09:35:11 -0700 > From: el lodger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subjec

Fw: Re: [gentoo-user] /bin is gone

2003-05-29 Thread el lodger
Begin forwarded message: Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 09:35:11 -0700 From: el lodger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] /bin is gone On Wed, 28 May 2003 15:43:51 +0200 "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [gentoo-user] /bin is gone

2003-05-27 Thread el lodger
On Tue, 27 May 2003 22:43:54 -0600 (MDT) Scott Carmichael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > emerge -u would just just update the packages though... He'd want to > do either 'emerge -e world' or perhaps 'emerge -e system' would be > enough. > > --- > Scott Carmichael > http://jobeus.net It doesn't mat

Re: [gentoo-user] /bin is gone

2003-05-27 Thread el lodger
On Wed, 28 May 2003 00:38:51 -0400 Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 27 May 2003 21:03:52 -0700 el lodger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Stupidity never goes out of style. > > I have wiped out the /bin directory - don't ask. > > I

[gentoo-user] /bin is gone

2003-05-27 Thread el lodger
Stupidity never goes out of style. I have wiped out the /bin directory - don't ask. Is there a way to repair the damage or must I do a complete reinstall? -- Powered by GENTOO LINUX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] april fools?

2003-04-01 Thread el lodger
rt, That's the time time I will believe that the newsletter will be delayed because of "maintenance". ;) el lodger -- Powered by GENTOO LINUX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] april fools?

2003-03-31 Thread el lodger
t; > I thought I would have heard rumours about it on here if it had any > truth to it... > > Happy April Fools' Day everyone > > Alex I'm glad I read all these April Fool letter before I read the newsletter. WHEW!! el lodger -- Powered by GENTOO LINUX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-user] updating scrollkeeper-does not validate

2003-03-31 Thread el lodger
t;>> gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.2.4 merged. el lodger - - Powered by GENTOO LINUX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Web/Quickcam program Suggestions Needed

2003-03-25 Thread el lodger
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:22:13 -0800 "Ralph F. De Witt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for your reply. I did a quick look and xawtv seems to be in > portage while camE is not. [EMAIL PROTECTED] roger $ qpkg -i came media-video/came-1.2 camE is a rewrite of the xawtv webcam app, which

Re: [gentoo-user] problem at bootup

2003-03-25 Thread el lodger
age to do just that. Thank you, el lodger -- Powered by GENTOO LINUX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-user] gst-plugins compile failure

2003-03-18 Thread el lodger
gst-plugins-0.6.0-r4 Why is it looking for /usr/kde/3 when I use 3.1? In other parts of the build it uses /usr/kde/3.1/lib/libartsc.so. /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link g++ -march=pentium3 -O2 -pipe -o libgstwincodec.la -rpath /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.6 -module -avoid-version libgstwincodec_la-gs

[gentoo-user] gst-plugins compile failure

2003-03-18 Thread el lodger
mpile, Line 153, Exitcode 2 !!! (no error message) el lodger -- Powered by GENTOO LINUX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-user] ghostscript emerge failure

2003-03-07 Thread el lodger
Bug 17050 Has anyone gotten ghostscript-7.05.6 to build? -- Powered by GENTOO LINUX -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] is gcc compiling?

2003-03-05 Thread el lodger
On 05 Mar 2003 13:56:55 -0800 Spundun Bhatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 13:08, el lodger wrote: > > On 05 Mar 2003 10:15:15 -0800 > > Spundun Bhatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi I cant get the source compile for the la

Re: [gentoo-user] is gcc compiling?

2003-03-05 Thread el lodger
On 05 Mar 2003 10:15:15 -0800 Spundun Bhatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi I cant get the source compile for the latest gcc 3.2.2-r3. > Here is the final error. Is somebody getting it to compile?Or getting > a similar error? Compiled for me. Running blackdown-jdk-1.4.1. Roger -- Powered by GENT

[gentoo-user] libgnomecanvas emerge fail

2003-03-01 Thread el lodger
In update libgnomecanvas from 2.0.2.1 I get the following checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.3 libart-2.0 >= 2.3.8 pango >= 1.0.1 pangoft2 >= 1.0.1... Package pangoxft was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory contain

[gentoo-user] etc-update make.globals

2003-02-22 Thread el lodger
I just downgraded portage from 2.0.47-r2 to 2.0.46-r12. etc-update lists 1)/etc/make.globals Now I know we are not supposed to edit make.globals and don't ever recall seeing it come up in etc-update. We should edit make.conf instead to make changes in make.global. porc2 root # etc-update Scanning

[gentoo-user] baselayout and xfree up/downgradegrade

2003-02-10 Thread el lodger
After syncing emerge -up world gives a slew of upgrades (mostly gnome related). I am using baselayout-1.8.6.2 and emerge wants to downgrade to 1.8.5.8. I read that 6.2 wasn't supposed to be released but no reason was given to downgrade. 6.2 seems to be working ok and I don't really want go through

Re: [gentoo-user] can't logon to kde/gnome

2003-02-09 Thread el lodger
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 18:04:00 -0500 Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ernie Schroder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > DISPLAYMANAGER=kdm # Make sure this line is uncommented (xdm > > > should Well I'm back on gentoo after uncommenting the DM and setting XSESSION for kde-3.1. Thanks Ern

[gentoo-user] kdelibs-3.1-r1 & gcc_pre

2003-02-02 Thread el lodger
I had kdelibs-3.1-r1 installed but it screwed up the desktop and klauncher. I unmerged and tried to re-emerge it after doing an emerge sync. emerge -pu kdelibs listed gcc-3.2.2_pre20030131 kdelibs-3.1-r1 So I do the emerge and the new gcc cleans out the old gcc-3.2.1. Ok, fine. But kdelibs-3.1-r-

[gentoo-user] kdesktop & klauncher error

2003-02-01 Thread el lodger
Having gotten kde-3.1 working nicely after switching to ~86 I did another emerge sync. Ok, lets try the kdelibs & base-3.1-r1 and see what happens. (BTW, these 2 took 12hrs to compile- p3-600,512ram). Now when I boot kde3.1 I get an: error kdesktop Could not start process unable to create 10-slav

[gentoo-user] qt-3.1.0-r2 sandbox error

2003-01-30 Thread el lodger
Well I went for it. I swtched to accept keyword and tried to update my system. 49 apps went OK but qt gave the following error: /var/tmp/portage/qt-3.1.0-r2/work/qt-x11-free-3.1.0/bin/uic -L /var/tmp/portage/qt-3.1.0-r2/work/qt-x11-free-3.1.0/plugins mainwindow.ui -i mainwindow.h -o mainwindow.cpp