Achilles Limbouris wrote:
I agree with Robert & Xyvind, that can't be real music ;)
The .bz2 compression ratio (vs. the wav) was 1 : 5.781
I tried bzipping some Chopin (bzip2 version 1.02, no cmdline options) and I
got a measley 1 : 1.24
Personally though, (with my speakers at least), I can't tell
I agree with Robert & Xyvind, that can't be real music ;)
The .bz2 compression ratio (vs. the wav) was 1 : 5.781
I tried bzipping some Chopin (bzip2 version 1.02, no cmdline options) and I
got a measley 1 : 1.24
Personally though, (with my speakers at least), I can't tell the difference
between 1.4
Redeeman wrote:
the one i got compressed alot was from a cd with soundtrack from a game, so no voice from a singing person, maybe that has something to say
Perhaps very repetative, with each repetition containing exactly the
same samples .. Like, for instance, a MOD/tracker-like file converted to
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 17:01, Øyvind Stegard wrote:
> Redeeman wrote:
> > and as an answer to Øyvind Stegard's question:
> > its not a joke, and if i uncompress the tarball it works 100% and i get
> > the same md5sum of the file before and after.
> >
> > and yes, this was ripped from a original cd,
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 02:28:45PM +0100, Christian Aust wrote:
> Redeeman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) schrieb am 08.12.2003 14:12 Uhr:
>
> > HMM, i just tested this again, but with another track, and it seems it
> > depends extremely much on what track it is
>
> I've tried it on a 16 Minutes Audio file
Redeeman wrote:
and as an answer to Øyvind Stegard's question:
its not a joke, and if i uncompress the tarball it works 100% and i get
the same md5sum of the file before and after.
and yes, this was ripped from a original cd, using grip, which i used
cdparanoia within.
Pardon me, then. I guess this
Redeeman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) schrieb am 08.12.2003 14:12 Uhr:
> HMM, i just tested this again, but with another track, and it seems it
> depends extremely much on what track it is
I've tried it on a 16 Minutes Audio file (176MB of 98 per cent funk [does
anybody know the song? :-)]), the tar.bz2 w
HMM, i just tested this again, but with another track, and it seems it
depends extremely much on what track it is
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 14:03, Spider wrote:
> begin quote
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:57:32 +0100
> Redeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > due to the last 2 threads about ogg and mp3,
begin quote
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:57:32 +0100
Redeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> due to the last 2 threads about ogg and mp3, i decided to make some
> test, and they shows some extremely interresting things.
>
hmm, redoing this myself disproves your idea :
64306076 Depeche Mode - Sister o
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 13:25, Jonas Widarsson wrote:
> Redeeman wrote:
>
> >due to the last 2 threads about ogg and mp3, i decided to make some
> >test, and they shows some extremely interresting things.
> >
> >i have used the following tools: tar, bz2, lame, oggenc
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/soun
sorry, about the ogg file. i forgot i putted that in another dir.
-rw-r--r--1 redeeman redeeman 3.1M Dec 8 13:49 the_hero.ogg <--
made with oggenc the_hero.wav, so its standard options, now for the best
possible ogg:
-rw-r--r--1 redeeman redeeman 14M Dec 8 13:51 the_hero.ogg
made
Redeeman wrote:
due to the last 2 threads about ogg and mp3, i decided to make some
test, and they shows some extremely interresting things.
i have used the following tools: tar, bz2, lame, oggenc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/sound_test$ ls -lh
total 90.4M
-rw-r--r--1 redeeman redeeman 8.3M Dec 8
On Monday 08 December 2003 13:57, Redeeman wrote:
> due to the last 2 threads about ogg and mp3, i decided to make some
> test, and they shows some extremely interresting things.
>
> i have used the following tools: tar, bz2, lame, oggenc
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/sound_test$ ls -lh
> total 90.4M
>
Redeeman wrote:
due to the last 2 threads about ogg and mp3, i decided to make some
test, and they shows some extremely interresting things.
i have used the following tools: tar, bz2, lame, oggenc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/sound_test$ ls -lh
total 90.4M
-rw-r--r--1 redeeman redeeman 8.3M Dec
begin quote
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:57:32 +0100
Redeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this even shows that its better to bz2 them than to compress with
> varible bitrate, joint sterio 320kbps mp3. the compressions time was
> even smaller on the bz2, so i wonder if there is going to be a bz2
> plug
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:57:32 +0100 Redeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
R> due to the last 2 threads about ogg and mp3, i decided to make some
R> test, and they shows some extremely interresting things.
R>
R> i have used the following tools: tar, bz2, lame, oggenc
R>
R> [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/sound
due to the last 2 threads about ogg and mp3, i decided to make some
test, and they shows some extremely interresting things.
i have used the following tools: tar, bz2, lame, oggenc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/sound_test$ ls -lh
total 90.4M
-rw-r--r--1 redeeman redeeman 8.3M Dec 8 12:43
the_hero
17 matches
Mail list logo
