On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 04:28, Diego Zamboni wrote:
- Long sequences of random dictionary words in their messages, which
perhaps make it look more normal to filters.
I use bogofilter (a bayesian filter [only]). When the
heap-of-random-dictionary-words technique cropped up, I was really
worried -
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:57:56 +1100
Andrew Cowie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I wonder how many people are spam blocking this thread? :)]
I got:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=2.63
on your mail, so you needn't worry, I guess. :) Although I'm not
Hi all SpamAssassin users!
I am using SA since some months now and never had to look back. It filtered
around 98-99% of all spam mails out. But since one or two months, I would
say the false negative rate is around 30%, but I do not have any idea why
this could be.
On another SA installation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 17:16, Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
Did so many spammers changed their spam technics? What could be done (if
possible only with SA's help) to reach my hit rate of 99% again? An update
to SA version 2.60 did not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:16:24 +0100
Matthias F. Brandstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all SpamAssassin users!
I am using SA since some months now and never had to look back. It filtered
around 98-99% of all spam mails out. But since one or
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 16:16 CET Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
Did so many spammers changed their spam technics? What could be done (if
possible only with SA's help) to reach my hit rate of 99% again? An
update to SA version 2.60 did not change anything :(
Yes, they did change their
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all SpamAssassin users!
I am using SA since some months now and never had to look back. It
filtered
around 98-99% of all spam mails out. But since one or two months, I would
say the false negative rate is around 30%, but I do not have any
Thanks for the replies, I will check through your suggested web pages
now
Greetings, Matthias
--
First Bush invades my home turf, then he takes my pals, then he makes fun
of the way I talk -- probably -- now he steals my right to raise a
disobedient, smart-alecky son! Well, that's it!
- Original Message -
From: Brian Downey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SpamAssassin not as good as before :(
Now four or five are slipping through a day. The only thing I can suggest
(and what I have been
Did so many spammers changed their spam technics? What could be done (if
possible only with SA's help) to reach my hit rate of 99% again? An update
to SA version 2.60 did not change anything :(
I noticed the same starting some time ago (1-2 months as well). I think
spammers have started
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Dacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] SpamAssassin not as good as before :(
I'm running courier-imap on my box and have spamassassin move any spam
into
a spam folder (so I
11 matches
Mail list logo
