I've been running 2.6.10 for some time. Then I started reading some stuff
that I should update my Dell Inspiron 8200 notebook to UDEV. So I followed
the gentoo wiki page and used kernel 2.6.13. This caused (known) issues with
my nvidia driver and I couldn't get the USB mouse to work (yet the alps
On Tuesday 15 Nov 2005 5:42 pm, El Nino wrote:
dear friends,
what is the best p2p (Gnutella support) client for linux?
Try Apollon with the plugins for OpenFT, Gnutella, FastTrack and Ares. I feel
it is one of the best out there.
Abhay
pgpwo9q5LmomR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 08:56 schrieb ext Daevid Vincent:
I've been running 2.6.10 for some time. Then I started reading some stuff
that I should update my Dell Inspiron 8200 notebook to UDEV. So I
followed the gentoo wiki page and used kernel 2.6.13. This caused (known)
issues with my
Recently, around October 23rd, I've noticed that my cron.daily stuff isn't
running. I've tried to 'restart' vixiecron and it complains that it's
already started (duh). So I'll killall cron, rm the pid, etc. and then start
it again and it works for a while then dies again. I made a simple script
(I think, without checking) devfs has been removed from 2.6.14 and
everything is supposed to be udev from now on.
A suggestion made out of frustration with 2.6.14 - use 2.6.13-r3 first.
Some kernel versions have had glitches with udev, and I know -r2 and -r3
are working for me on the i82k.
The
On 2005-11-16 14:11:28 +0930 (Wed, Nov), Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 23:00 -0500, ellotheth rimmwen wrote:
because I just couLDN'T TAKE ANY MORE.
And you're obviously using vi to compose mail :) Still haven't figured
out the backspace and caps? Now, if you were using
On Wednesday 16 Nov 2005 5:35 am, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
gmplayer -mplayer itself does refuse to run.
Oh, but if you know mplayer so well, maybe you can tell me, how to fast
forward (2x, 4x) in (g)mplayer? I do not mean skip forward some seconds, I
mean real fast forward?
The only
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 09:22 schrieb ext W.Kenworthy:
(I think, without checking) devfs has been removed from 2.6.14 and
everything is supposed to be udev from now on.
Nope, not yet. Only the config options have been commented out.
First udev, install udev according to the gentoo
Hello all,
My Gentoo installation is running fine at the moment, but ever since I
installed it, I have had the boot up message Failed to resolve module
dependencies! displayed during the boot process. Does anyone have any
idea what may be causing this and how to resolve it?
Thanks,
--
Ant...
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 09:42 schrieb ext Dirk Heinrichs:
Nope, not yet. Only the config options have been commented out.
Correction: The config options have been removed, not just commented out.
The devfs code is still there.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:31:01 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
I still don't understand the logic of not having vi installed by
default over nano...
easier for newbies.
And ethically acceptable to emacs users :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Top Oxymorons Number 31: Small crowd
signature.asc
Description:
Correction: The config options have been removed, not just commented out.
The devfs code is still there.
You mean there's still devfs in 2.6.14, but it is hidden?
What's the sense of this?
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 10:19 schrieb ext brullo nulla:
You mean there's still devfs in 2.6.14, but it is hidden?
What's the sense of this?
It's very hard to remove devfs from the kernel. Just removing the configure
options for it makes it easier to put it in again, in case of to much
On Wednesday 16 Nov 2005 4:25 am, Willie Wong wrote:
An option to skip installing dictd is to install the commandline
version of StarDict, http://sdcv.sourceforge.net/ Last I checked it is
not in portage. It doesn't really work like Kdict, but suits my needs
well enough.
Ok so I installed sdcv
I'm in over my head---bigtime. Trying to install a good gentoo
setup, to configure xorg where I have been forced to use the last
working video card in my parts box: a matrox mystique. The system
is ok, with A7V600 MB, 512 MB RAM, and an Athlon XP 2600+. Video
is corrupted using Gentoo, no matter
Hi folks ! i´m trying to emerge the sun-jdk but i receive an emerge restrictuin to this package. How can I merge this package to the tree instead installing this package manualy ??
hosttmp # emerge -p sun-jdk
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies
I'm experiencing unending problems compiling packages on a new install
system. The current one was gtk+ :
gtkdoc-scan --module=gdk-pixbuf --source-dir=../../../gdk-pixbuf
--ignore-headers=pixops gdk-pixbuf-alias.h gdk-pixbuf-marshal.h
gdk-pixbuf-xlib-private.h gdk-pixbuf-i18n.h
On 11/15/05, abhay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 16 Nov 2005 1:14 am, Jeff Smelser wrote: I am using 1.3.6 and i havent had problem with crashes unless I start messing with the cover manager..I am using 1.3.6 as well and not messing with cover manager. In fact I didn't
even know something
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 12:31 schrieb ext Thiago Lüttig:
Hi folks ! iŽm trying to emerge the sun-jdk but i receive an emerge
restrictuin to this package. How can I merge this package to the tree
instead installing this package manualy ??
Just follow the instructions. Portage can't
so I must download an self installing executable and manualy install it in my system ?? I can make an gentoo package containing the jdk after the install ?
On 11/16/05, Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 12:31 schrieb ext Thiago Lüttig: Hi folks ! iŽm trying to
Thiago Lüttig wrote:
Hi folks ! i´m trying to emerge the sun-jdk but i receive an emerge
restrictuin to this package. How can I merge this package to the tree
instead installing this package manualy ??
!!! dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.09 has fetch restriction turned on.
!!! This probably means
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 09:37, abhay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 Nov 2005 5:35 am, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
gmplayer -mplayer itself does refuse to run.
Oh, but if you know mplayer so well, maybe you can tell me, how to fast
forward (2x, 4x) in (g)mplayer? I do not mean skip forward
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 02:15, Nick Rout wrote:
Interesting, is this on all files, or just some?
Is it the same in gmplayer and mplayer?
gmplayer -mplayer itself does refuse to run.
Oh, but if you know mplayer so well, maybe you can tell me, how to fast
forward (2x, 4x) in
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 12:54 schrieb ext Thiago Lüttig:
so I must download an self installing executable and manualy install it
in my system ??
No, download, then emerge again. The self-extracting refers to the fact
that there are two downloads available for Linux. The ebuild expects
Thiago Lüttig wrote:
Hi folks ! i´m trying to emerge the sun-jdk but i receive an emerge
restrictuin to this package. How can I merge this package to the tree
instead installing this package manualy ??
By reading the error message. It's all written there in
the rows starting with a *.
Thiago Lüttig wrote:
so I must download an self installing executable and manualy install it
in my system ??
No. What does make you think that? Just read the error
message and act accordingly.
I can make an gentoo package containing the jdk after
the install ?
No.
PS: Please no full quote,
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 09:28 +0100, Mariusz Pękala wrote:
You know that ellotheth just wanted to scream, and it was not a mistake?
Yes, I was just making an attempt at humour...
;-)
:-7
--
Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:05:28 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
thanks, but that is pretty un-intuitive.
xine uses arrow up/down for the speed... a combination where I do not
need to span my fingers over half the keyboard..
But mplayer also jumps forward with mouse wheel up, and backwards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daevid Vincent wrote:
But I don't think that will slove it, as the date of the file his Aug
11th... So that means it was running fine for several months with the wrong
perms...
is it running? I mean, ps ax shows it?
- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman -
On 11/16/05, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 09:28 +0100, Mariusz Pękala wrote:
You know that ellotheth just wanted to scream, and it was not a mistake?
Yes, I was just making an attempt at humour...
Hey, I laughed. =D
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Thanks, I will try to fix the reverse addressess ... thanks.
On 11/15/05, Bryan Whitehead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dig -x 210.200.1.1 | grep AUTHORITY\ SEC -A 1
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
1.200.210.in-addr.arpa. 10733 IN SOA dns.ht.net.tw.
root.dns.ht.net.tw.
abhay schreef:
On Wednesday 16 Nov 2005 4:25 am, Willie Wong wrote:
An option to skip installing dictd is to install the commandline
version of StarDict, http://sdcv.sourceforge.net/ Last I checked it
is not in portage. It doesn't really work like Kdict, but suits my
needs well enough.
Is there something akin to the KDE timer?
--Kurt
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 16 Nov 2005 5:31 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
FATAL: Konnte Videofilter (-vf) oder -ausgabetreiber (-vo) nicht
initialisieren.
I could not make much out of that error message (still need to learn a lot of
languages ;) ) but looks like a problem with your video output driver
Hi, im tunnig a postgresql server and i want to know what is the default
value for
kernel's PAGE_SIZE
Is this a gentoo especific value or aplies to linux kernels in general, i mean,
any distribution?
Thanks
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 13:55, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:05:28 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
thanks, but that is pretty un-intuitive.
xine uses arrow up/down for the speed... a combination where I do not
need to span my fingers over half the keyboard..
But
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 15:46, abhay wrote:
On Wednesday 16 Nov 2005 5:31 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
FATAL: Konnte Videofilter (-vf) oder -ausgabetreiber (-vo) nicht
initialisieren.
I could not make much out of that error message (still need to learn a lot
of languages ;) ) but
Antoine wrote:
Hi,
We are going to set up ssl on a webserver at work and I guess that means
we need a certificate... does anyone have any useful alternatives to
Verisign? Are they really worth the name?
We are not going to be doing any monetary transactions but our clients
are very security
On 11/16/05, Fernando Meira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'm using 1.2.4 thou..
It behaved very well before.. but now it just crashes all the time... I
dont remember to have done anything different that may have caused
this...
Anyway, I'll update to 1.3.6 and see how it goes..
Fernando.
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:14:18 +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
mplayer also allows you to redefine all of these in its config file.
You don't have to worry about it being intuitive when you get to
choose the key bindings.
but xine does it right without the need of editing the conf, so
On 16 November 2005 15:57, Holly Bostick wrote:
abhay schreef:
On Wednesday 16 Nov 2005 4:25 am, Willie Wong wrote:
An option to skip installing dictd is to install the commandline
version of StarDict, http://sdcv.sourceforge.net/ Last I checked it
is not in portage. It doesn't really
On 11/16/05, Fernando Meira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well.. the update didn't go as well as I would like!
Here's where the problem started! Any idea?
make[6]: *** [libamarokarts.la] Error 1
make[6]: Leaving directory
On 11/16/05, Jorge Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm experiencing unending problems compiling packages on a new install
system. The current one was gtk+ :
snip
cd ./html gtkdoc-mkhtml gdk-pixbuf ../gdk-pixbuf.sgml
parser error : out of memory error
snip
Could there be some
Willie Wong wwong at Princeton.EDU writes:
What package is the command `dig' in?
equery belongs dig
is a really nifty search tool
James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 11/16/05, Dirk Heinrichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 10:19 schrieb ext brullo nulla:
You mean there's still devfs in 2.6.14, but it is hidden?
What's the sense of this?
It's very hard to remove devfs from the kernel. Just removing the configure
options for
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Richard Fish wrote:
Probably not, because it isn't gcc that is failing...it is
gtkdoc-mkhtml, and it is running out of memory.
You can either merge gtk with USE=-doc, which will skip this step, or
use MAKEFLAGS=-j1, which will run only one process at a time, and
reduce
Miguel wrote:
Hi, im tunnig a postgresql server and i want to know what is the default
value for
kernel's PAGE_SIZE
Is this a gentoo especific value or aplies to linux kernels in general,
i mean, any distribution?
This is a processor-specific value, and on x86 it's 4096 bytes. It's
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 04:08:01PM +, James wrote:
Willie Wong wwong at Princeton.EDU writes:
What package is the command `dig' in?
equery belongs dig
is a really nifty search tool
except it doesn't work when bind-tools isn't ALREADY installed. =D
I was trying to find
On 11/16/05, Jeff Smelser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 10:05 am, Preston Hagar wrote: Although amarok is probably my favorite audio player, I have found it to be a little finicky. I usually find it works best with xine. I usually use a
-arts -gstreamer xine so xine is
On 11/16/05, Derek Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
(DISCLAIMER: Let me start off by saying that this is truly not a flame but
more of a concern. So please do not flame me for stating my
opinions/concerns.)
SNIP
Understood. I certainly didn't take it that way.
I have been an avid Gentoo
kashani wrote:
Antoine wrote:
Hi,
We are going to set up ssl on a webserver at work and I guess that
means we need a certificate... does anyone have any useful
alternatives to Verisign? Are they really worth the name?
We are not going to be doing any monetary transactions but our clients
Remember that your web server must be properly
configured (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/ssl/ssl_howto.html) in
order to offer any real security.
The howto says SGC is only available with verisign - is this true?
Cheers
Antoine
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
-Original Message-
From:
Richard Fish
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 10:10 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Xorg compile errors
On 11/15/05, Budd, Tracy wrote:
- I have run memtest86+ and prime95 extensively to check
for memory
Hi,
This only saves you space in your distfiles directory. Instead of
having full tarballs for each release of KDE, you get the major
release and then all the minor fixes in xdelta packages.
z
On 16/11/05, LostSon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All
I was looking at some things tonight and
On Monday 14 November 2005 23:26, abhay wrote:
Hello,
I would like to install a dictionary application in KDE that can be run
without using internet. Though Kdict is available but it requires me to
have a internet connection for its search; which I am unable to provide
everytime. I have
On 11/16/05, Derek Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a lot longer than I originally intended it to be so if you want the
jist of it skip to the end.
(DISCLAIMER: Let me start off by saying that this is truly not a flame but
more of a concern. So please do not flame me for stating my
On Wednesday 16 Nov 2005 7:27 pm, Holly Bostick wrote:
This does not suggest that sdcv actutally *has* these dictionaries
contained within it. But likely whatever is missing can be found at the
stardict site
http://stardict.sourceforge.net/
Dictionaries would seem to be found at
On Wednesday 16 Nov 2005 8:48 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
Andmplayer does indeed honor the aspect-ratio. Sadly, you are forced to
have the window in the right ratio (not like xine, where you can have the
window in every ratio you like, and xine adds blavk lines where needed).
mplayer
SNIP
I use Gentoo to run all my boxen and I love it. That being said, I have
ALWAYS done a stage1 install. Never had a single problem I couldn't fix.
Then, suddenly, they switched everything to stage3 and removed a LOT of
options from the Gentoo build process. I LIKED being able to modify
On Wednesday 16 Nov 2005 9:08 pm, Fernando Meira wrote:
.libs/rawscope_impl.o(.gnu.linkonce.d._ZTCN6Amarok13RawScope_implE4_N4Arts1
4StdSynthModuleE+0xb8): undefined reference to `virtual thunk to
Arts::StdSynthModule::streamEnd()' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[6]: ***
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:20:36 -0500
Derek Tracy wrote:
Part way through the online handbook I noticed that
they standardized the Stage3 install. I figured that since the developers
thought it was best to use a Stage3 install then why not give it a shot.
I read your message and was surprised
-Original Message-
From: Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 5:14 AM
Daevid Vincent wrote:
But I don't think that will slove it, as the date of the
file his Aug
11th... So that means it was running fine for several
months
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:05:28 +0100
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
thanks, but that is pretty un-intuitive.
xine uses arrow up/down for the speed... a combination where I do not need to
span my fingers over half the keyboard..
there is a mechanism to change the keybindings to suit your
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:04:53 -0700
Joseph wrote:
I could borrow any-body's in the family computer and use Knoppix (with
knock and ssh) to log-in to my system or to do any Banking; as I
wouldn't trust their Windows system. I think this would eliminate all
the spywere and key-loggers if
-Original Message-
From: Nick Rout
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 3:12 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:20:36 -0500
Derek Tracy wrote:
Part way through the online handbook I
Nick Rout wrote:
I read your message and was surprised at this. Last time I read the
handbooks the Handbook gave stage 1/2/3 options and the 2005.1
handbook stuck to stage 3. (Talking x86 here, I have never done an
instal on other architectures).
Now, like you, I read this in the Handbook:
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:12, Nick Rout wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:20:36 -0500
Derek Tracy wrote:
Part way through the online handbook I noticed that
they standardized the Stage3 install. I figured that since the developers
thought it was best to use a Stage3 install then why
On 11/16/05, Benjamin Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:12, Nick Rout wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:20:36 -0500
Derek Tracy wrote:
Part way through the online handbook I noticed that
they standardized the Stage3 install. I figured that since the
On 11/16/05, Daniel da Veiga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/16/05, Derek Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a lot longer than I originally intended it to be so if you want the jist of it skip to the end.
(DISCLAIMER: Let me start off by saying that this is truly not a flame but more of a
Nick Rout wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:20:36 -0500
Derek Tracy wrote:
Part way through the online handbook I noticed that
they standardized the Stage3 install. I figured that since the developers
thought it was best to use a Stage3 install then why not give it a shot.
I read your message
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:47, Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm not a developer and I've never done a Stage 1 install so I cannot
say for sure, but it's my understanding that after a Stage 3 install
most people end up rebuilding everything anyway within a few weeks.
Very soon my Stage 3 and your
I couldn't have said it better myself.On 11/16/05, Benjamin Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:47, Mark Knecht wrote: I'm not a developer and I've never done a Stage 1 install so I cannot say for sure, but it's my understanding that after a Stage 3 install most people
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:30:28 -0600
kashani wrote:
Nick Rout wrote:
I read your message and was surprised at this. Last time I read the
handbooks the Handbook gave stage 1/2/3 options and the 2005.1
handbook stuck to stage 3. (Talking x86 here, I have never done an
instal on other
On 11/16/05, Benjamin Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:47, Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm not a developer and I've never done a Stage 1 install so I cannot
say for sure, but it's my understanding that after a Stage 3 install
most people end up rebuilding everything
I also want to reiterate that if they are going to make a Stage3 install the default then make it a rock solid release. And in my opinion portage needs to be pruned not only of un-maintained packages but also of packages that conflict with others.
Like I said before a Stable tree should be just
Mark Knecht wrote:
Good points. I agree it doesn't seem like the Gentoo way to remove
options, however, in response to Derek's original point about rising
or fallign numbers of Gentoo new users it might be wise to make the
default install Stage 3, thus making the newest users most likely more
I nailed it on my system. I had some free time so installed gdb and ran
amarok. Looks like if Retrieve similar artists is checked under Last.fm, it
crashes amaroK. I unchecked the option and now it runs flawlessly.
Check it in your case as well.
Abhay
pgpz44QaXHAhK.pgp
Description: PGP
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 02:50 pm, Derek Tracy wrote:
That is what I was thinking when I switched to stable. From what I am
seeing either my computer doesn't like stable code or stable does not mean
stable anymore.
But thats not what you said. I Quote:
In the past I have always
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 02:55 pm, Benjamin Martin wrote:
True that the installations become identical very soon. But what if I set
up server using stage 1 and an up-to-date portage tree. After the
installation is finished it'll sit around doing whatever it's supposed to
do and I don't
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 03:37 pm, abhay wrote:
I nailed it on my system. I had some free time so installed gdb and ran
amarok. Looks like if Retrieve similar artists is checked under Last.fm,
it crashes amaroK. I unchecked the option and now it runs flawlessly. Check
it in your case as
On 11/16/05, Derek Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When a branch is marked stable all of the packages in that branch should
work,
I'm not sure this is always possible. Much of your complaint comes
from the ipw2200 driver, which is new in 2.6.14. But the in-kernel
version is several versions
Updating the kernel today, I referenced that piece of the
documentation and borrowed this command from it:
genkernel --bootloader=grub all
However, not only did it not update grub.conf but grub.conf
disappeared entirely following the successful build.
I did find this in /var/log/genkernel.log:
On 11/16/05, Derek Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also want to reiterate that if they are going to make a Stage3 install the
default then make it a rock solid release. And in my opinion portage needs
to be pruned not only of un-maintained packages but also of packages that
conflict with
On 11/16/05, Jeff Smelser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 02:50 pm, Derek Tracy wrote: That is what I was thinking when I switched to stable. From what I am seeing either my computer doesn't like stable code or stable does not mean
stable anymore.But thats not what you
Yes udev works, however works well is something else entirely. Udev has
been the bane of my life a number of times - at least with devfs I had a
chance of working it out. It often seems like we take two steps back
with every new approach, and take a lot of pain just to get back to
where we were.
On 11/16/05, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/16/05, Derek Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When a branch is marked stable all of the packages in that branch should work,I'm not sure this is always possible.Much of your complaint comes
from the ipw2200 driver, which is new in 2.6.14.But
Updating the kernel today, I referenced that piece of the
documentation and borrowed this command from it:
I'm pretty sure I need some new kind of grub.conf but what should it
look like..
I've just appended what I think might be adequate to the original
lines yeah I saved a backup..
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:44:49 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
I use Gentoo to run all my boxen and I love it. That being said, I
have ALWAYS done a stage1 install. Never had a single problem I
couldn't fix. Then, suddenly, they switched everything to stage3 and
removed a LOT of
Derek Tracy wrote:
I also want to reiterate that if they are going to make a Stage3 install
the default then make it a rock solid release. And in my opinion
portage needs to be pruned not only of un-maintained packages but also
of packages that conflict with others.
Like I said before a
Willie Wong wwong at Princeton.EDU writes:
What package is the command `dig' in?
equery belongs dig
is a really nifty search tool
except it doesn't work when bind-tools isn't ALREADY installed. =D
I was trying to find out which package to emerge.
Yes it would require you to
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:23:50 + (UTC)
James wrote:
Debian has such an index, and I often visit to see what software can do what.
Unless I've missed the wiki, there's really no place at all to read about
the various pacakges available on Gentoo.
James
Read the archives. This is
On 11/16/05, William Kenworthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes udev works, however works well is something else entirely. Udev has
been the bane of my life a number of times - at least with devfs I had a
chance of working it out. It often seems like we take two steps back
with every new
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 16:25 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
Updating the kernel today, I referenced that piece of the
documentation and borrowed this command from it:
genkernel --bootloader=grub all
I've never trusted it...
However, not only did it not update grub.conf but grub.conf
If these clients *know* you, and *trust* you, and know anything about
security, there is no reason why you couldn't get away with a self-signed
cert.
If not, http://www.instantssl.com/
I can second this. I will be buying my mail server certs through
InstantSSL in a few weeks. So far, I've
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:44:49 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I use Gentoo to run all my boxen and I love it. That being said, I
| have ALWAYS done a stage1 install. Never had a single problem I
| couldn't fix. Then, suddenly, they switched everything to stage3 and
| removed a LOT of options
On 11/16/05, Derek Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I am complaining about is that neither of the drivers will work.
What doesn't work? Does the module build? Does it load? What errors
do you get? Does it work if you run the same kernel version and
driver you used before?
If the
On 11/16/05, Derek Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would have to disagree with you on this. I do not believe that it is a
config issue I beleive that many of the x86 packages still do not play well
with each other, that is what I am saying needs fixed.
Again, be specific please. Give us
On 11/16/05, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ Note: looks like I'm missing half this thread because certain
jackasses are posting HTML messages to the list. You'd think people
would've learned by now... ]
We've tried educating about the evils of HTML (and top-posting). It
always
I have a athlon xp 3000 processor and a DFI
LanParty KT400A Socket A Motherboard, 1 gig of ddr ram. I think i am
having kernel config problems with it. I am using the highpoint raid.
when i installed linux i had to use the 2004.3 disk with the smp
kernel. I'm not really sure what the differences
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:50:14 +1000
Alan E. Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gather that there was a bug in the mga drivers some time ago, and it
appears that the xorg drivers have incorporated the patches I have seen
during my google searches.
I had one running on Gentoo last year, before
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
