James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gentoo needs an easy to use, graphical installation CD, period. What I
> would do is lower(simplify) the goals of what that installation CD
> accomplishes. Once you get a drive prepared, kernel installed and the
> basic tools installed (binary or compiled). At t
Am Thu, 8 Nov 2007 19:22:14 +0100
schrieb Herbert Laubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> I am trying to get on gentoo-wiki.com. Without luck. Other pages aer
> working fine, so I do not think, it is a problem of my settings.
>
> Regards,
> Herb
The page I have open eventually finishes loading, bu
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:05:18 +, Guanqun Lu wrote:
>
> > We can't expect that all the Gentoo users should be a linux geek
> > first, and then have a try on Gentoo linux sytem.
>
> Why not? Gentoo is aimed at more experienced users, Linux novices are
>
I suggest you install ntpd, which will sync time with ntp server. And
I dont think set CLOCK="UTC" is a good idea. If you are using WINXP,
it will change your clock to local always.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Vaeth mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de> writes:
> Only if you run CLOCK=UTC the shift is guaranteed to work in any case
> (of course, unless another program like windows interferes).
Well 'local' did not work, so I'm going to set it to UTC and see what happens
in the spring.
James
--
[EMAIL P
Albert Hopkins letterboxes.org> writes:
> /etc/init.d/clock is run pretty early in the init process; before all
> filesystems in /etc/fstab are mounted. If /usr/share/zoneinfo is on a
> filesystem that is not mounted when /etc/init.d/clock is run then it
> will fail and ugly things will happen
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 21:03 -0600, Dan Farrell wrote:
[snip]
Sorry to jump in late in the thread, but have you come across sabayon?
It seems to address some of your concerns...
http://www.sabayonlinux.org/
http://wiki.sabayonlinux.org/index.php
http://junauza.blogspot.com/2007/09/sabayon-gentle-
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 01:18:35 +
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And the Gentoo
> manual install is not exactly difficult, it just needs a wilingness to
> read the docs.
A prerequisite that is well deserved. The question is whether there's
a place for another option. The present se
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 08:02 -0800, Grant wrote:
> > +1 to rrdtool. At my company, we set up rrdtool to graph 100's of
> > graphs per day on all sorts of data from different sources. It's very
> > customisable, if you want to spend the time on it. I also found the
> > creator and forum very sup
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:40:26 -0800
kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hate to pull the "expert" card, but I was the network
> engineer/architect who built Netzero's original network so I've got
> some passing familiarity with this stuff.
I'm glad you pulled this card; I want to learn
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 17:45:44 + (UTC), James wrote:
> > At which point the new user is diving into the handbook partway
> > though, missing important information from the first part. There is
> > no point in using graphical installer if users still need to drop to
> > the command line to adminis
Dan Farrell wrote:
It's because of the metric of the routes in the routing table,
actually. Without routing, your computer talks to no one. Haven't you
ever set up a network connection by hand : ) ?
I hate to pull the "expert" card, but I was the network
engineer/architect who built Netze
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 19:22:14 +0100
Herbert Laubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to get on gentoo-wiki.com. Without luck. Other pages aer
> working fine, so I do not think, it is a problem of my settings.
>
> Regards,
> Herb
Looks like it's down, at least as I'm seeing it.
Ge
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:05:09 +0100
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This morning, I upgraded to glibc 2.7 from whatever used to be current
> in ~x86 before that (2.6.).
>
> Do you guys do a "emerge -e system", ie. recompile everything, after
> such an upgrade?
>
> Tha
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 08:22:58 +0200
Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 'old' install method meant to use just no-X terminal from a
> LiveCD. Then you just follow the handbook (installation) and you're
> done. Could be done for half an hour/45 min/,but an hour or two will
> suffice for most
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 07:31:33 +0200
Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The graphical installer is known to fail sometimes (not always :-)
> Many people prefer the (old) install method - using a terminal.
++.
Miernik,
I _highly_ recommend using a the manual install method from th
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:13:48 -0800
kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Buying a single GigE card would appear to be simpler and cheaper
> unless you don't have a GigE switch. :-)
well, it just so happens I don't. (The 4-port card cost me $0). Some
day the file servers will have Gigabit, and so
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 17:29 -0500, Eric Martin wrote:
> Why copy? when stuff gets updated you'll have to copy again. I'd
> suggest making a symlink. Also, I see the timestamps and sizes are the
> same, but are the md5's the same? If not, these aren't the same file.
>
Copy is what the emerg
James wrote:
> Shawn Haggett podgeweb.com> writes:
>
>
>
>>> In my /etc/conf.d/clock file I have these relevant settings:
>>> CLOCK="local"
>>> TIMEZONE="America/New_York"
>>> CLOCK_SYSTOHC="yes"
>>>
>
>
>> Is the /etc/localtime file correct? i.e.:
>>
>
>
>> $ cp /usr/share/zo
James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Any other ideas?
> Maybe I need to 'reemerge' something?
>
timezone-data?
Cheers,
Roger
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:48:11AM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
>> Pretty short, if you ask me ;)
>> What?
>> Pardon?
>> Exactly.
>> That's too basic. People asking that kind of question shouldn't be
>> administering a system.
>> See howto.
>> They don't belong toge
When I emerge ogre, I get the following error message:
i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../OgreMain/include
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I../../OgreMain/include -DOGRE_NONCLIENT_BUILD -O2
-march=i686 -pipe -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -MT
OgreActionTarget.lo -MD -
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng/ says nothing about a November
> release, or any release date for 2007.1, and that page should be
> considered authoritative.
In my browser, it does say something about a November release of
2007.1. But it also says
Hello people, i have a problem i don't know hoy to approach. When i try to
emerge Squeak, it fails throwing the following error message:
*
* ERROR: dev-lang/squeak-3.9.7 failed.
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 1701: Called dyn_compile
* ebuild.sh, line 1039: Called qa
this is a problem with http server at gentoo-wiki.com.
server is up and responding to (my) icmp request packet's ;)
On Nov 8, 2007 7:32 PM, Kale Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/8/07, Herbert Laubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am trying to get on gentoo-wiki.com. Without l
On 11/8/07, Herbert Laubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to get on gentoo-wiki.com. Without luck. Other pages aer working
> fine, so I do not think, it is a problem of my settings.
>
> Regards,
> Herb
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>
>
times out for me
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am trying to get on gentoo-wiki.com. Without luck. Other pages aer working
fine, so I do not think, it is a problem of my settings.
Regards,
Herb
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 08 November 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:35:06AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> > 071108 James wrote:
> > > In my /etc/conf.d/clock file I have these relevant settings:
> > > CLOCK="local"
> >
> > That sb "utc".
>
> I have heard that Windows expects the hardware clo
Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > All you have said presupposes one (erroneous) assumption: that is an
> > easy to use graphical install cannot be used if the distro is source
> > code based. Nothing could be further from the truth. An easy to use
> > graphical installation, should only b
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 08:02:58 -0800 Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I was thinking it would be pretty handy to generate a series of
> > > > transposed (or not) graphs for data like cpu usage, mysql usage,
> > > > memory usage, external monitoring response times, http traffic,
> > > > e
> > > I was thinking it would be pretty handy to generate a series of
> > > transposed (or not) graphs for data like cpu usage, mysql usage,
> > > memory usage, external monitoring response times, http traffic, etc.
> > > My external monitoring service has an API I can hook into and http
> > > traf
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:35:06AM -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> 071108 James wrote:
> > In my /etc/conf.d/clock file I have these relevant settings:
> > CLOCK="local"
>
> That sb "utc".
I have heard that Windows expects the hardware clock to be in local
time, including daylight savings adjustmen
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:48:11AM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Pretty short, if you ask me ;)
> What?
> Pardon?
> Exactly.
> That's too basic. People asking that kind of question shouldn't be
> administering a system.
> See howto.
> They don't belong together. See the howto.
> What?
> It isn't.
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, James wrote:
> In my /etc/conf.d/clock file I have these relevant settings:
> CLOCK="local"
> TIMEZONE="America/New_York"
> CLOCK_SYSTOHC="yes"
>
> it's a dual boot (XP & gentoo) workstation.
>
> I had to set the time manually to adjust for the 1 hour shift.
I guess you mean t
Google "bonding linux". Basically at the ethernet level you make eth[0-3] =
bond0. You'll then have the bandwidth of all the nics as one nic. Your
switch might need some extra setup - but this is the best way to go.
On 11/8/07, kashani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dan Farrell wrote:
> > Thanks f
On Thursday 08 November 2007 00:26:18 Dan Farrell wrote:
> So, let's say I bond the 4 together. Now I have 2 interfaces, a bond
> and eth0. I still need to route through one or the other, so I still
> have the problem.
So you've got 5 interfaces?
Once you've bonded interfaces together the unde
Eric S. Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> Eric S. Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
>> pvcreate /dev/hda vgcreate data /dev/hda lvcreate -L42g data mkfs
>> /dev/data/lvol0
>>
>> What's so hard about that? Does that fit on a postcard?
>
Hello.
I'm trying to install one package from a binary package http host.
To do so, I added to my make.conf:
PORTAGE_BINHOST="http://public-files.askwar.gentoo-packages.s3.amazonaws.com/GentooUSB/packages/All/";
Now I
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:05:18 +, Guanqun Lu wrote:
>
>
>> We can't expect that all the Gentoo users should be a linux geek first,
>> and then have a try on Gentoo linux sytem.
>>
>
> Why not? Gentoo is aimed at more experienced users, Linux novices are
> already amp
Neil Bothwick wrote:
All that would do is increase the number of disaffected users. You need
to read the documentation and use the command line to use Gentoo
effectively, hiding that behind a pretty pointy-clicky installer until
the system is installed and then hitting the user with the truth c
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:05:18 +, Guanqun Lu wrote:
> We can't expect that all the Gentoo users should be a linux geek first,
> and then have a try on Gentoo linux sytem.
Why not? Gentoo is aimed at more experienced users, Linux novices are
already amply catered for by other distros. I would nev
I found this by chance:
http://linux.die.net/man/8/mount
Somewhat different from the output of "man mount". What is happening
here? Things like
mount --make-shared mountpoint
mount --make-slave mountpoint
mount --make-private mountpoint
mount --make-unbindable moun
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 02:24:49 + (UTC), James wrote:
> All you have said presupposes one (erroneous) assumption: that is an
> easy to use graphical install cannot be used if the distro is source
> code based. Nothing could be further from the truth. An easy to use
> graphical installation, should
On (08/11/07 10:14) Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 8. November 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > This morning, I upgraded to glibc 2.7 from whatever used to be current
> > in ~x86 before that (2.6.).
> >
> > Do you guys do a "emerge -e system", ie. recompile everyth
On Donnerstag, 8. November 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This morning, I upgraded to glibc 2.7 from whatever used to be current
> in ~x86 before that (2.6.).
>
> Do you guys do a "emerge -e system", ie. recompile everything, after such
> an upgrade?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexander Skwar
Hello!
This morning, I upgraded to glibc 2.7 from whatever used to be current
in ~x86 before that (2.6.).
Do you guys do a "emerge -e system", ie. recompile everything, after such
an upgrade?
Thanks,
Alexander Skwar
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
46 matches
Mail list logo
