Sorry, I don't see how firmware can affect sensitivity. I've
been involved in writing firmware for RF data communications
stuff for a long time, and I've certainly never been able to
affect sensitivity.
I can say that I was really struggling to get a reliable wireless
de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
Verifying archive integrity... All good.
Uncompressing VirtualBox 1.6.0 Guest Additions for Linux installation
...
VirtualBox 1.6.0 Guest Additions installation
Which: no dkms in
(/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin...)
Building
Arthur Britto wrote:
You likely want more than a minute. Most likely, you don't want your
system to crash when coming back up when power fails soon after it is
restored: your system could be in the middle of a fsck. Generally, you
want enough capacity to: power off, power on, and then power
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 11 May 2008, Martin Lehmann wrote:
Now the problem is, that this is a image of a whole hdd. I only need
one partition out of it.
Then i want to copy the content of this partition to a partition
located of the real hdd
A brute force approach, but probably the
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, PaulNM wrote:
Even better would be losetup from sys-apps/util-linux.
see:
http://www.nabble.com/%22loopback-mount%22-hard-drive-image-created-w
ith-dd--td14945355.html
He doesn't want to mount a dd'ed *filesystem* as a loopback device, he
wants to mount a single
Alan McKinnon wrote:
http://www.nabble.com/%22loopback-mount%22-hard-drive-image-created-w
ith-dd--td14945355.html
He doesn't want to mount a dd'ed *filesystem* as a loopback device, he
wants to mount a single filesystem out of several which is inside an
entire diskimage file.
losetup
When running `eix-test-obsolete' after update world and revdep-rebuild
I get a list of 14 pkgs under the heading as listed below.
What does this mean... I'm running ~x86 and have been for yrs so the
ones that show `U' should have gotten updated during ... -vuD world.
root # emerge -vp
Has anyone else noticed jwhois queries to have quit working?
I get
root # jwhois 128.111.24.43
[Querying whois.arin.net]
[Error creating socket]
[Unable to connect to remote host]
If I change the default server, still get the same message.
Changing to alpha style notation:
jwhois
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When running `eix-test-obsolete' after update world and revdep-rebuild
I get a list of 14 pkgs under the heading as listed below.
What does this mean... I'm running ~x86 and have been for yrs so the
ones that show `U' should have
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When running `eix-test-obsolete' after update world and
revdep-rebuild I get a list of 14 pkgs under the heading as listed
below.
What does this mean... I'm running ~x86 and have been for yrs so the
ones that show `U' should have gotten updated
On Tue, 13 May 2008 07:18:33 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I guess I don't understand how the system got these packages but
appears not to know much about them.
Try adding --with-bdeps y and see if that addresses it. I've got this
in my make.conf file
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--with-bdeps y
On on a cable provider (comcast).
My router shows a constant hammering from numerious chinese IPs on
port 1027 and 1026.
Its not really apparent what is going on .. looking at the date graph
presented here:
http://isc.sans.org/port.html?port=1027
Other google hits don't say much about it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On on a cable provider (comcast).
My router shows a constant hammering from numerious chinese IPs on
port 1027 and 1026.
Its not really apparent what is going on .. looking at the date graph
presented here:
http://isc.sans.org/port.html?port=1027
Other google hits
Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If so what is the massive chinese interest in icq?
found this in the net:
http://www.grc.com/port_1026.htm
http://www.grc.com/port_1027.htm
That doesn't give any analysis of why this port is being hammered by
hundreds, even thousands of IP originating
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 13 May 2008 07:18:33 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I guess I don't understand how the system got these packages but
appears not to know much about them.
Try adding --with-bdeps y and see if that addresses it. I've got this
in my make.conf
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess I don't understand how the system got these packages but
appears not to know much about them.
Try adding --with-bdeps y and see if that addresses it. I've got this
in my make.conf file
It does want to upgrade one of the pkgs with that set.
On Tue, 13 May 2008 11:46:26 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another possibility is that ypou merged them with the --oneshot
option, or that they were pulled in as a dependency of a package you
no longer have (or has been updated to a version that is no longer
dependent on them). What
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008 11:46:26 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another possibility is that ypou merged them with the --oneshot
option, or that they were pulled in as a dependency of a package you
no longer have
Sun, 11 May 2008 23:53:19 +0100
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2008 01:05:56 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
So, please, check what your /etc/fstab reads about / in case you
have accidentally overwritten it by answering yes to etc-update or
dispatch-conf.
That's not
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for X11?
(this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least when I used
Debian).
Thanks in advance
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 21:50 +0200, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least when
I used Debian).
I forget, but I tried it a while back and didn't see positive results.
In my
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least
when I used Debian).
Nice factor for X makes graphical software run fater? I don't thinl
so. Not at all.
Uwe
--
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Abraham Gyorgy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for X11?
(this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least when I used
Debian).
Thanks in advance
If you run startx, I think you can do
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least
when I used Debian).
Nice factor for X
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least
when I used Debian).
Nice factor for X makes graphical software run
On Dienstag, 13. Mai 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for X11?
(this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least when I used
Debian).
which is how many years ago?
really, with a recent kernelX you more likely HURT
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think you should, as long as nothing system-critical is listed, and
emerge shouts loudly about removing those.
I think your are probably right...
For example, one of the listed pkgs is:
gnome-base/libgnomeui
which equery says `firefox' and
Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008 11:46:26 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another possibility is that ypou merged them with the --oneshot
option, or that they were pulled in as a
Andrey Falko wrote:
Ahh I see. I don't know much about MTRR...all I know is that you can
adjust them via grub:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=10
Hmm... I missed that one. Thanks.
My grub kernel command line (which I haven't given much thought to since
it's
On Tue, 13 May 2008 16:18:42 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I somehow doubt that firefox will cease to work if I unmerge
libgnomeui.
So what if it does? It not like it will stop your computer booting and is
nothing a revdep-rebuild couldn't fix.
--
Neil Bothwick
668 - The neighbour of the
On Tue, 13 May 2008 10:06:39 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I think you should, as long as nothing system-critical is listed, and
emerge shouts loudly about removing those.
On a long list of packages to be cleaned I find it comforting to use
emerge -C package1 package2 package3
and
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008 21:50:24 +0200
Abraham Gyorgy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least
when
On Tue, 13 May 2008 21:50:24 +0200
Abraham Gyorgy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least
when I used Debian).
Thanks in advance
If I wanted to change the niceness of X,
I have been battling this weirdness for several months, and it has
been getting worse and worse. Now I can't even unpack half the man
pages.
The short of it is that a lot of binaries on my system are linked
against gcc 3.4.9, even if I remerge them from scratch. It happened
with gcc 4.2.2, I
On Tue, 13 May 2008 22:42:39 -0400
Andrey Falko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for
X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least
when I used Debian).
Thanks in advance
If I wanted to change the
-Original Message-
From: PaulNM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 7:25 AM
de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
Verifying archive integrity... All good.
Uncompressing VirtualBox 1.6.0 Guest Additions for Linux
installation
Well, first I'd do a dmesg |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If so what is the massive chinese interest in icq?
found this in the net:
http://www.grc.com/port_1026.htm
http://www.grc.com/port_1027.htm
That doesn't give any analysis of why this port is being hammered by
37 matches
Mail list logo
