Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008 schrieb ext [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The short of it is that a lot of binaries on my system are linked
against gcc 3.4.9, even if I remerge them from scratch.
There is no such thing as gcc 3.4.9.
It happened
with gcc 4.2.2, I emerged 4.2.3 and it still happens. The
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Andrey Falko wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level
for X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster,
On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Justin wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If so what is the massive chinese interest in icq?
found this in the net:
http://www.grc.com/port_1026.htm
http://www.grc.com/port_1027.htm
That doesn't give any analysis of why
On Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been battling this weirdness for several months, and it has
been getting worse and worse. Now I can't even unpack half the man
pages.
The short of it is that a lot of binaries on my system are linked
against gcc 3.4.9, even if I
On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Marko Kocić wrote:
Is it a known issue with 2.6.26-rc1 kernel? How could I painlessly
migrate configuration from old 2.6.25 kernel to 2.6.26 without need
for complete reconfiguration?
make menuconfig always keeped current config before, did it change
recently?
It
Hi all,
I'm using vanilla-sources-2.6.25.1 right now.
I tried to configure and build 2.6.26_rc1 like I did many times before.
create symlink to linux-2.6.26-rc1 folder
go to linux folder
make menuconfig
save
make
make modules_install install
Everythinh seems to build ok, with some
My wallpaper doesnt come up when Gnome starts, but if i open the System -
Preferences - Appearance dialogue it appears (i dont even need to make a
change). So it looks like something is not running until i open the dialogue.
Any ideas on how to fix it? Or will i have to resort to 'mv .gnome
Am 14.05.2008 um Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
My wallpaper doesnt come up when Gnome starts, but if i open the
System -
Preferences - Appearance dialogue it appears (i dont even need to
make a
change). So it looks like something is not running until i open the
dialogue.
Any ideas on how to fix
On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Marko Kocić wrote:
It might be the case. I don't currently have access to my home
laptop, but there were lots of modules that are missing. Alsa and
iptables failed to start after reboot and I ended up in console
screen which is small and in the center of the screen.
2008/5/14 Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Marko Kocić wrote:
Is it a known issue with 2.6.26-rc1 kernel? How could I painlessly
migrate configuration from old 2.6.25 kernel to 2.6.26 without need
for complete reconfiguration?
make menuconfig always keeped
2008/5/14 Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Marko Kocić wrote:
It might be the case. I don't currently have access to my home
laptop, but there were lots of modules that are missing. Alsa and
iptables failed to start after reboot and I ended up in console
On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Marko Kocić wrote:
Perhaps the output of dmesg and the relevant bits of messages from
the init process will be required here
Yes, I'll have to digg more to fix this. I just hoped that there is
some easy/fast
solution that I didn't know of :(
It is going to be a
Hi,
I have a lot of masked packages installed on my system. The packages are
installed but not unmasked. Is there an easy way to find those packages?
Daniel
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
2008/5/14 Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Marko Kocić wrote:
Perhaps the output of dmesg and the relevant bits of messages from
the init process will be required here
Yes, I'll have to digg more to fix this. I just hoped that there is
some easy/fast
Dunno if this will get you every masked package, but at least should be
quite close; if you run
emerge -pv --emptytree world
you can check the packages that are being downgraded, quite probably the
reason for this downgrading will be that the installed version is a masked
one.
Just an idea.
Daniel Mendler schrieb:
Hi,
I have a lot of masked packages installed on my system. The packages
are installed but not unmasked. Is there an easy way to find those
packages?
Daniel
See this
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Keywords
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Regenerate_package_keywords
Both tips
On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Daniel Mendler wrote:
Hi,
I have a lot of masked packages installed on my system. The packages
are installed but not unmasked. Is there an easy way to find those
packages?
How can you have a masked package installed but have not unmasked it?
To find all sorts of
Well I did a little Google'ing, and i found a blog. There the author wrote:
lapitopi gyuszk # snice -15 X
After doing this, I ran htop and it told me that my X11 was running with -15
niceness. I experience better responsiblity under all of X11 (kde,
firefox, konsole, anything). For example
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can you have a masked package installed but have not unmasked it?
By setting the ACCEPT_KEYWORDS flag in the command line when emerging?
Haven't done that for a while though, so I wouldn't know if
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS has
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 08:19:38AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
There is no such thing as gcc 3.4.9.
You emerged it with 4.2.3, but _at_runtime_ it's trying to get libstdc++
from 4.1.2. Check your environment, especially all variables with PATH in
their name (env|grep PATH), as well as
Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
Well I did a little Google'ing, and i found a blog. There the author
wrote:
lapitopi gyuszk # snice -15 X
As already pointed out, running process with a nice value less than 0
can only be done by root, and it's usually a really bad idea to run your
entire X session as
On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Josh Cepek wrote:
lapitopi gyuszk # snice -15 X
As already pointed out, running process with a nice value less than 0
can only be done by root, and it's usually a really bad idea to run
your entire X session as root. X (and applications running under X)
involve a
On AD 2008 May 13 Tuesday 09:50:24 PM +0200, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for X11?
(this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least when I used
Debian).
Before trying this, there are some kernel modifications you can try:
Hi everybody,
does anybody know what's happening to KDE4 in gentoo land ? Gentoo-KDE folks
were pretty responsive with previous 4.0.x releases updating portage tree
etc., but now I can't find much updates on what's happening with 4.0.4. Was
it 3.5.9 preparations that took priority?
Note:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Try: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.3 ldd
/usr/bin/lzma
This works.
Good.
If this works, try running env-update source /etc/profile, then
just ldd /usr/bin/lzma again.
Unfortunately, this doesn't work.
Did
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 06:40:24PM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Did you check /etc/ld.so.conf, maybe 4.1.2 is still listed before 4.2.3?
You may also need to clean up /etc/env.d a bit and running gcc-config again
afterwards also seems to be a good idea.
Thanks. I started looking at it
Mick wrote:
This is typical grc.com style FUD for paranoid MSWindows users. He is a
really good salesman in IT snakeoil (his background is in marketing).
I'll second this. He's clown.
kashani
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Hi folks,
libmad-0.2.1 doens't install libmad.la. Programs linking to it fail
during link stage. Is it a known issue?
Uwe
--
Ignorance killed the cat, sir, curiosity was framed!
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
Has emerge --depclean always removed older gentoo-sources or has
something changed? I don't remember this operation. Maybe I'm
forgetting something I already know on this subject but I'm drawing a
blank this afternoon.
I'm curious if there is a way to mask package from --depclean
On Wed, 14 May 2008 13:02:28 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Has emerge --depclean always removed older gentoo-sources or has
something changed? I don't remember this operation. Maybe I'm
forgetting something I already know on this subject but I'm drawing a
blank this afternoon.
I'm
On Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2008, Uwe Thiem wrote:
Hi folks,
libmad-0.2.1 doens't install libmad.la. Programs linking to it fail
during link stage. Is it a known issue?
there is no 'libmad-0.2.1' on my system.
But probably you are hit by flameeyes test. Just revdep-rebuilt.
Or install
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2008 13:02:28 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Has emerge --depclean always removed older gentoo-sources or has
something changed? I don't remember this operation. Maybe I'm
forgetting something I already know
I just ran emerge --depclean and missed that it was going to remove
gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2, the sources for the kernel I'm currently using.
Now what I'm not sure about is, do I need the sources, or is the kernel image
in /boot sufficient. Do I need to build myself a new working kernel
On Thursday 15 May 2008, Matthew R. Lee wrote:
I just ran emerge --depclean and missed that it was going to remove
gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2, the sources for the kernel I'm currently
using. Now what I'm not sure about is, do I need the sources, or is
the kernel image in /boot sufficient. Do I
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 18:42:05 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 15 May 2008, Matthew R. Lee wrote:
I just ran emerge --depclean and missed that it was going to remove
gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2, the sources for the kernel I'm currently
using. Now what I'm not sure about is, do I need the
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Matthew R. Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just ran emerge --depclean and missed that it was going to remove
gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2, the sources for the kernel I'm currently using.
Now what I'm not sure about is, do I need the sources, or is the kernel image
Following a recent jump from pre openrc to post openrc via emerge -vuD
world, sendmail is now failing to authenticate with my Smart host.
I'll say in advance that I am not interested in switching MTAs for the
inevitable suggestions to switch to a different MTA.
Far as I know nothing has changed
Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It appears to be, at root, just another snivel about how MS does
things with no substance.
I understand it the other way round. It is not an active knocking on
your ports, but a passive MS thing. Lots of Chinese bought a new
computer with an MS operating
My wallpaper doesnt come up when Gnome starts,
snip
Does 'nautilus' start? Try using 'nautilus --no-desktop'...
Not sure if it tries to or not, but when I try to run it as you suggest, it
dies;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ nautilus --no-desktop
[1] 7059
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ Initializing
Hello,
I have a installation that did not complete successfully.
I need to re enter the chroot environment, using a
install cd. For argue purposes, let's assume the hard drive
is formatted exactly as the example in the handbook. All I want to
do is emerge an older kernel and compile it.
2008/5/15, James [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I have a installation that did not complete successfully.
I need to re enter the chroot environment, using a
install cd. For argue purposes, let's assume the hard drive
is formatted exactly as the example in the handbook. All I want to
do is
On Thu, 15 May 2008 00:56:29 + (UTC)
James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a installation that did not complete successfully.
I need to re enter the chroot environment, using a
install cd. For argue purposes, let's assume the hard drive
is formatted exactly as the example in the
James [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# mount -o bind /dev /mnt/gentoo/dev
[...]
Any of the above steps that are not necessary?
Other have commented about the .../boot stuff but in dozens of times
chrooting during all kinds of install situations I've never done
`mount -o bind /dev
On Thursday 15 May 2008, Mark Knecht wrote:
you can add lines by hand in /var/lib/portage/world
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources:2.6.24-r7
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources:2.6.24-r8
Note the use of the colon instead of the dash. Don't ask me why but
that's what works.
You can't put version numbers into
44 matches
Mail list logo
