Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 10:24:57AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
I only need a runtime. I don't know the programming language, so
there's no need for a full-blown development environment.
OK, so I *WAS* going to try the Sun JRE. It seems that there's no
such animal. You h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Walter Dnes wrote:
>> I only need a runtime. I don't know the programming language, so
>> there's no need for a full-blown development environment.
>
> OK, so I *WAS* going to try the Sun JRE. It seems that there's no
> such animal. You have to
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 10:24:57AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
> I only need a runtime. I don't know the programming language, so
> there's no need for a full-blown development environment.
OK, so I *WAS* going to try the Sun JRE. It seems that there's no
such animal. You have to download the
On 6/5/2008 4:49 PM Eric Martin said the following:
Drew Tomlinson wrote:
Ever since I upgraded my gentoo-sources kernel from 2.6.23 to 2.6.25,
I can no longer see packets on my wireless network for any device
other than my own. The tcpdump output looks like this:
20:49:32.909144 00:12:bf:2a
On 6/6/2008 2:40 AM Mick said the following:
On Tuesday 03 June 2008, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
Ever since I upgraded my gentoo-sources kernel from 2.6.23 to 2.6.25, I
can no longer see packets on my wireless network for any device other
than my own. The tcpdump output looks like this:
20:49:32
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 10:24:57AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
>
> - which one gives the least trouble setting up and running?
Thanks for your input everybody. According to /proc/cpuinfo, I'm
running an "AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+", but it's in 32-bit
mode. I'll go with Sun Java.
--
W
2008/6/7, Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> * Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Try atom, from portage-utils, then use cut or awk to select the third
> > > item of output.
>
> >Ah, cool. That helps a lot :)
>
> > > > then map
> > > > the upstream's versioning schemes to my norm
* Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try atom, from portage-utils, then use cut or awk to select the third
> item of output.
Ah, cool. That helps a lot :)
> > then map
> > the upstream's versioning schemes to my normalized one.
> > *If* Gentoo strictly follows the upstream's versioning s
On Saturday 07 June 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 16:10:57 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > * Preparing ath_hal module
> > ../scripts/get_arch.mk:44: *** ARCH mismatch: supplied "x86",
> > determined "i386". Stop.
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224543
Thank you Neil, just add
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 17:16:28 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> I guess there's some non-trivial translation process needed.
> First I have to cut-off the Gentoo's internal patchlevel
> (aka. same upstream release, but updated ebuild),
Try atom, from portage-utils, then use cut or awk to select the
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 16:10:57 +0100, Mick wrote:
> * Preparing ath_hal module
> ../scripts/get_arch.mk:44: *** ARCH mismatch: supplied "x86",
> determined "i386". Stop.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=224543
--
Neil Bothwick
My friends went to alt.california, and all they brought
me w
* Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> I don't get the problem correctly, but if you want to work with ebuild
> versions I can point you to the versinator.eclass of the portage.
maybe I should clarify my intend a bit more:
I want to build an database which tells whether some release
"a.b.c.
ARAMS} ${BUILD_TARGETS}";
* The die message:
* Unable to emake HOSTCC=i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc CC=i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
LDFLAGS= KERNELPATH=/lib/modules/2.6.24-gentoo-r8/build all
*
* If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if
relevant.
* A complete buil
On Saturday 07 June 2008, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On 6/7/08, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm, I seem to have these set up:
> >
> >
> > /opt/opera/lib/opera/plugins:/opt/netscape/plugins:/opt/mozilla/plugins:/
> >usr/lib/mozilla/plugins:/usr/lib/nsbrowser/plugins
> >
> > Is the order in wh
On 6/7/08, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, I seem to have these set up:
>
>
> /opt/opera/lib/opera/plugins:/opt/netscape/plugins:/opt/mozilla/plugins:/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins:/usr/lib/nsbrowser/plugins
>
> Is the order in which they are listed important?
>
Don't think so. On my system, in
15 matches
Mail list logo
