Pandu Poluan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:06, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 20:56, schrieb Dale:
David W Noon wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:27:03 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about
"[gentoo-user] Need for revdep-rebuild":
After upgrading icu today I found that s
>> Sounds like a case for a swap partition that can be activated when you
>> need it for big emerges. I hit the same thing with firefox-5 oddly
>> enough.
>
> I have one smallish swap partition at PRI=10 and a bigger one at PRI=1.
>
>> As for OOo, long ago I figured the pain wasn't worth the gain s
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:06, Florian Philipp wrote:
>
> Am 25.07.2011 20:56, schrieb Dale:
> > David W Noon wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:27:03 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about
> > "[gentoo-user] Need for revdep-rebuild":
> >
> >
> After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-p
On 07/25/2011 08:00 PM, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 10:45 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On 07/22/11 21:56, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
>>> Is there anyone who can help me recover my raid array?
>>>
Next, I tried commenting out the previously added DEVICE line, and
adding
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 17:30 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild
> >> which found nothing to to.
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 10:45 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 07/22/11 21:56, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> > Is there anyone who can help me recover my raid array?
> >
> >>
> >> Next, I tried commenting out the previously added DEVICE line, and
> >> adding
> >> ARRAY /dev/md0 devices=/dev/sda,/dev/sdb,
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 10:45 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 07/22/11 21:56, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> > Is there anyone who can help me recover my raid array?
> >
> >>
> >> Next, I tried commenting out the previously added DEVICE line, and
> >> adding
> >> ARRAY /dev/md0 devices=/dev/sda,/dev/sdb,
On 07/25/2011 01:00 PM, Dale wrote:
> I'm not subscribed and [lkml] is a very high traffic list.
Only a masochist or a kernel dev would subscribe to that list.
A far better way is to track the family of kernel-related lists
on gmane.org, e.g. the gmane.linux.kernel newsgroup.
You can even post
On 07/25/2011 10:27 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Just a note to anyone who hasn't already found out the hard way:
>
> After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-printer-common wouldn't
> compile because it couldn't find the right icu library.
Just one package? You got
On 07/25/2011 06:44 AM, pk wrote:
> On 07/25/11 14:24, walt wrote:
>
>> So, you're saying that usb stick has actually changed in some way after
>> the install? That's certainly possible. Have you tried making a new
>> one from the live cd?
>
> ...I did redo the usb stick but it refuses to boot
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
> Hartmut Figge:
>
>> You are right and to quick to to hold back my own previous reply. ;)
>
> Hard to understand a sentence with such many errors. A challenge. :)
I like puzzles but I understood perfectly what you said. :)
Hartmut Figge:
> You are right and to quick to to hold back my own previous reply. ;)
Hard to understand a sentence with such many errors. A challenge. :)
Hartmut
--
Usenet-ABC-Wiki http://www.usenet-abc.de/wiki/
Von Usern fuer User :-)
Paul Hartman:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paul Hartman
>> I believe --library rebuilds everything that uses that library, not
>> broken packages.
>
> To test my theory you can run the command again and see if it finds
> the same 2 packages again. :)
You are right and to quick to to hold b
Hartmut Figge:
> Now, shouldn't these have been found already by the previous revdep-rebuild?
And after the next revdep-rebuild --library='libosp.so.*' the same two
packages are found and rebuild. And so on.
i5 hafi # revdep-rebuild -p --library='libosp.so.*'
[...]
* Checking dynamic linking
[
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild
>> which found nothing to to. But i noticed, that the emerge recommended to
>> execute revdep-rebui
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild
> which found nothing to to. But i noticed, that the emerge recommended to
> execute revdep-rebuild --library='libosp.so.*'. Doing this two packages
> were fo
Greetings,
after the emerge -uDN world of today i proceeded with revdep-rebuild
which found nothing to to. But i noticed, that the emerge recommended to
execute revdep-rebuild --library='libosp.so.*'. Doing this two packages
were found and emerged.
Now, shouldn't these have been found already by
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
>
> !!! Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/usr/portage/packages/dev-
> lang/python-3.1.2-r4.tbz2'
>
>
> eix doesn't show such a version of python, so where is it coming from?
Cruft left over somewhere? Possibly try:
locate python
Hello list,
I want to clean out some dross before my routine backup, but eclean falls
over with this error:
# eclean-pkg
* Building file list for packages cleaning...
* Cleaning binary packages...
!!! Could not get stat info for:/usr/portage/packages/dev-lang/python-3.1.2-
r4.tbz2
!!! Error:
Todd Goodman wrote:
* Dale [110725 14:43]:
Todd Goodman wrote:
Dale (and whoever else was having problems with Firefox and X hangs,)
I don't know if you've seen it but:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/24/54
looks like a thread that might be applicable?
Todd
That does look
* Dale [110725 14:43]:
> Todd Goodman wrote:
> > Dale (and whoever else was having problems with Firefox and X hangs,)
> >
> > I don't know if you've seen it but:
> >
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/24/54
> >
> > looks like a thread that might be applicable?
> >
> > Todd
> >
> >
> >
>
> That
Todd Goodman wrote:
Dale (and whoever else was having problems with Firefox and X hangs,)
I don't know if you've seen it but:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/24/54
looks like a thread that might be applicable?
Todd
That does look interesting. I had a few times where mine would just
hang
Am 25.07.2011 20:56, schrieb Dale:
> David W Noon wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:27:03 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about
> "[gentoo-user] Need for revdep-rebuild":
>
>
After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-printer-common
wouldn't compile because it couldn't find the ri
David W Noon wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:27:03 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about
"[gentoo-user] Need for revdep-rebuild":
After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-printer-common
wouldn't compile because it couldn't find the right
Dale (and whoever else was having problems with Firefox and X hangs,)
I don't know if you've seen it but:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/24/54
looks like a thread that might be applicable?
Todd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:27:03 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about
"[gentoo-user] Need for revdep-rebuild":
>After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-printer-common
>wouldn't compile because it couldn't find the right icu library.
>
>Revdep-re
On 2011-07-25, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Just a note to anyone who hasn't already found out the hard way:
>
> After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-printer-common
> wouldn't compile because it couldn't find the right icu library.
>
> Revdep-rebuild was required to fix this - so it do
Hello list,
Just a note to anyone who hasn't already found out the hard way:
After upgrading icu today I found that system-config-printer-common wouldn't
compile because it couldn't find the right icu library.
Revdep-rebuild was required to fix this - so it does still have a use, after
all.
-
Helmut Jarausch igpm.rwth-aachen.de> writes:
> emerge -vp app-office/libreoffice
> shows that the USE flag -java is in effect.
> How to find out where this comes from?
equery hasuse java
hth,
James
On 07/22/11 21:56, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> Is there anyone who can help me recover my raid array?
>
>>
>> Next, I tried commenting out the previously added DEVICE line, and
>> adding
>> ARRAY /dev/md0 devices=/dev/sda,/dev/sdb,/dev/sdc
>>
>> mdadm --assemble --scan returns something different
>> mda
On 07/25/11 14:24, walt wrote:
> So, you're saying that usb stick has actually changed in some way after
> the install? That's certainly possible. Have you tried making a new
> one from the live cd?
No, I'm saying that the usb ports on the motherboard seems dead in my
now brand new Gentoo insta
On 07/25/2011 03:44 AM, pk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just put together a new computer composed of an Asus motherboard (AMD
> 990FX chipset, "Sabertooth" model, i.e. this one:
> http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/AMD_AM3Plus/SABERTOOTH_990FX/).
> Initially, the onboard usb devices worked fine in AMD64 Gent
On Monday 25 July 2011 11:02:34 Mick did opine thusly:
> After some deliberation I've started emerging libreoffice. It gave
> the usual office suite warnings at the beginning that there isn't
> enough space in /var (I have 5.8G and it was asking for more than
> 7G+).
>
> Half way through the emer
On Monday 25 July 2011 13:50:47 Helmut Jarausch did opine thusly:
> On 07/25/2011 01:34:39 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > euse -a
> >
> > part of gentoolkit, I believe.
> >
> > Ref: http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Gentoolkit
> >
> > Rgds,
> >
> > On 2011-07-25, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> > > Hi,
>
On 07/25/2011 01:34:39 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> euse -a
>
> part of gentoolkit, I believe.
>
> Ref: http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Gentoolkit
>
> Rgds,
>
>
> On 2011-07-25, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > emerge -vp app-office/libreoffice
> >
> > shows that the USE flag -java is in
On Monday 25 Jul 2011 12:13:49 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> emerge -vp app-office/libreoffice
>
> shows that the USE flag -java is in effect.
>
> How to find out where this comes from?
>
> I've checked /etc/portage/package.use /usr/portage/profiles and /
> etc/make.conf
euse -i java
On Monday 25 Jul 2011 12:18:34 YoYo Siska wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:40:55AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > I never understood properly how the mount --bind/rbind works. I
> > understand that the original partition content becomes visible on a
> > second partition, but I'm not at all sure what h
euse -a
part of gentoolkit, I believe.
Ref: http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Gentoolkit
Rgds,
On 2011-07-25, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> emerge -vp app-office/libreoffice
>
> shows that the USE flag -java is in effect.
>
> How to find out where this comes from?
>
> I've checked /etc/por
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:40:55AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 25 Jul 2011 11:24:33 YoYo Siska wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:02:34AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > > After some deliberation I've started emerging libreoffice. It gave the
> > > usual office suite warnings at the beginning that th
On Monday, July 25 at 21:04 (+1000), Adam Carter said:
> > No message about init, just no more console messages. I'll try the
> > kernel line. Thanks.
>
> Ok. i ran init from the shell, and it reported /dev/initctl no such
> device or directory.
>
> I hadnt copied the contents of /dev across -
Hi,
emerge -vp app-office/libreoffice
shows that the USE flag -java is in effect.
How to find out where this comes from?
I've checked /etc/portage/package.use /usr/portage/profiles and /
etc/make.conf
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
On Thursday 21 July 2011 10:53:25 Dale wrote:
> Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 July 2011 05:54:32 Dale wrote:
> >> I been working on gathering information for this for a while. I just
> >> tried something else. I use the download helper plugin in Firefox to
> >> download videos. Also,
> No message about init, just no more console messages. I'll try the
> kernel line. Thanks.
Ok. i ran init from the shell, and it reported /dev/initctl no such
device or directory.
I hadnt copied the contents of /dev across - i thought it was created
automagically?
Anyway, its copied now and I h
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Mick wrote:
> After some deliberation I've started emerging libreoffice. It gave the
> usual
> office suite warnings at the beginning that there isn't enough space in
> /var
> (I have 5.8G and it was asking for more than 7G+).
>
> Half way through the emerge I no
On Monday 25 Jul 2011 11:24:33 YoYo Siska wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:02:34AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > After some deliberation I've started emerging libreoffice. It gave the
> > usual office suite warnings at the beginning that there isn't enough
> > space in /var (I have 5.8G and it was ask
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:02:34AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> After some deliberation I've started emerging libreoffice. It gave the usual
> office suite warnings at the beginning that there isn't enough space in /var
> (I have 5.8G and it was asking for more than 7G+).
>
> Half way through the emerg
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:49:21 +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
>
>> When booting the kernel successfully mounts /dev/sdb3 as root fs
>> Then the system halts at one of the freeing memory messages, but I
>> assume the problem is that init isn't execut
On Sunday, July 24 at 09:49 (+1000), Adam Carter said:
> Summary;
> Copied / from sda3 to sdb3
> Updated the fstab in the new disk (/dev/sdb3 /
> btrfs noatime,compress=lzo0 0)
> Updated the kernel line's root=/dev/sda3 to /dev/sdb3 in grub.conf,
> but left the root (hd0,0) a
After some deliberation I've started emerging libreoffice. It gave the usual
office suite warnings at the beginning that there isn't enough space in /var
(I have 5.8G and it was asking for more than 7G+).
Half way through the emerge I noticed that I have only 74M left and is going
down fast!
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:49:21 +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
> When booting the kernel successfully mounts /dev/sdb3 as root fs
> Then the system halts at one of the freeing memory messages, but I
> assume the problem is that init isn't executed from /dev/sdb3
Doesn't the kernel say something along the
50 matches
Mail list logo
