Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On 09/19/2013 10:50 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 19/09/2013 20:58, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> Is having duplicate packages a good or a bad thing in gentoo? I'm clear
>>> about having duplicate packages for the kernel. I'm using the more
>>> recent one,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:32 PM, wrote:
> Spo do I need that overlay at all, or just emerge zfs and its module?
You do *not* need the overlay. Everything you need is in portage nowadays
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug.hun...@gmail.com)
Twitter: @hunleyd
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> I have to set up a server w/ 8x 1TB in about 2 weeks and consider ZFS as
> well, at least for data. So root-fs would go onto 2x 1TB hdds with
> conventional partitioning and something like ext4.
>
> 6x 1TB would be available for data .
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:32 PM, wrote:
> Spo do I need that overlay at all, or just emerge zfs and its module?
You do *not* need the overlay. Everything you need is in portage nowadays
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug.hun...@gmail.com)
Twitter: @hunleyd
On Thursday 19 Sep 2013 21:24:15 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 19 Sep 2013 17:32:16 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > Is it not part of the Mozilla suite anymore? Try seamonkey or
> > seamonkey-bin, which is the current incarnation of the suite.
>
> Yes, I find that Seamonkey has a Composer comp
On Thursday 19 Sep 2013 17:32:16 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Is it not part of the Mozilla suite anymore? Try seamonkey or
> seamonkey-bin, which is the current incarnation of the suite.
Yes, I find that Seamonkey has a Composer component, but it seems not to have a
CSS editor like that of the o
On 09/19/2013 10:50 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 19/09/2013 20:58, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Is having duplicate packages a good or a bad thing in gentoo? I'm clear
>> about having duplicate packages for the kernel. I'm using the more
>> recent one, but hanging on to the old one jus
On 19/09/2013 20:58, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Is having duplicate packages a good or a bad thing in gentoo? I'm clear
> about having duplicate packages for the kernel. I'm using the more
> recent one, but hanging on to the old one just in case.
>
> Perhaps, the reason for having dupl
Howdy,
Is having duplicate packages a good or a bad thing in gentoo? I'm clear
about having duplicate packages for the kernel. I'm using the more
recent one, but hanging on to the old one just in case.
Perhaps, the reason for having duplicate packages is the fact that
various packages I have inst
2013/9/19 Wang Xuerui
> 2013/9/19 gevisz :
> > I would like to build sane-backend only for one specific scanner.
> >
> > However, there are a huge lot of different USE flags for other scanners
> > that are already switched on by default.
> >
> > Is there any easy way to switch them off?
> >
> > S
On 09/19/2013 05:36 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 05:08:24PM +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've got a mysterious (at least to me ;) effect on system: When
>> playing DVDs with different players (vlc/mplayer) video and
>> audio seem to be ok. With one
Frank Steinmetzger [13-09-19 17:40]:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 05:08:24PM +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got a mysterious (at least to me ;) effect on system:
> > When playing DVDs with different players (vlc/mplayer)
> > video and audio seem to be ok.
> > With one excepti
2013/9/19 gevisz :
> I would like to build sane-backend only for one specific scanner.
>
> However, there are a huge lot of different USE flags for other scanners
> that are already switched on by default.
>
> Is there any easy way to switch them off?
>
> Something like:
>
> media-gfx/san
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 03:32:22PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I used to use Kompozer (part of the Mozilla suite) but time has passed and
> now
> the libraries it needs are no longer in portage. That's using the binary.
> Attempting to build it from source according to these ins
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 05:08:24PM +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a mysterious (at least to me ;) effect on system:
> When playing DVDs with different players (vlc/mplayer)
> video and audio seem to be ok.
> With one exception:
> I only /see/ the actors moving their mouths...
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:14:02 +0300, gevisz wrote:
> I would like to build sane-backend only for one specific scanner.
>
> However, there are a huge lot of different USE flags for other scanners
> that are already switched on by default.
>
> Is there any easy way to switch them off?
Yes, switch
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 07:58:05PM +0530, Yohan Pereira wrote:
> > I would like to build sane-backend only for one specific scanner.
> >
> > However, there are a huge lot of different USE flags for other scanners
> > that are already switched on by default.
> >
> > Is there any easy way to switc
Hi,
I've got a mysterious (at least to me ;) effect on system:
When playing DVDs with different players (vlc/mplayer)
video and audio seem to be ok.
With one exception:
I only /see/ the actors moving their mouths...there his
not a single voice audible.
Background sound and everything else is fine.
On 19/09/13 at 05:14pm, gevisz wrote:
> I would like to build sane-backend only for one specific scanner.
>
> However, there are a huge lot of different USE flags for other scanners
> that are already switched on by default.
>
> Is there any easy way to switch them off?
>
> Something like:
>
>
I would like to build sane-backend only for one specific scanner.
However, there are a huge lot of different USE flags for other scanners
that are already switched on by default.
Is there any easy way to switch them off?
Something like:
media-gfx/sane-backends -sane_backends* sane_bac
Hi list,
I used to use Kompozer (part of the Mozilla suite) but time has passed and now
the libraries it needs are no longer in portage. That's using the binary.
Attempting to build it from source according to these instructions [1] fails
too because the script can't find some other libraries.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Grant wrote:
You should definitely determine the right value for ashift on pool
creation
(it controls the alignment on the medium). It's an option that you afaik
can only set
on filesystem creation and therefore needs a restart from scratch
>> Especially with SSDs. One must find out the blocksize used by his/her SSDs.
>>
>> With spinning disks, setting ashift=12 is enough since no spinning
>> disks have sectors larger than 2^12 bytes.
>>
>> With SSDs, one might have to set ashift=13 or even ashift=14.
>
> May I suggest that we should
>>> You should definitely determine the right value for ashift on pool
>>> creation
>>> (it controls the alignment on the medium). It's an option that you afaik
>>> can only set
>>> on filesystem creation and therefore needs a restart from scratch if you
>>> get it
>>> wrong.
>>> According to the i
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-09-19 3:44 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
>> You should definitely determine the right value for ashift on pool
>> creation
>> (it controls the alignment on the medium). It's an option that you afaik
>> can only set
>> on filesystem creation
>> You should definitely determine the right value for ashift on pool
>> creation
>> (it controls the alignment on the medium). It's an option that you afaik
>> can only set
>> on filesystem creation and therefore needs a restart from scratch if you
>> get it
>> wrong.
>> According to the illumos w
I've been getting a kernel oops for awhile that is worse than ever in
3.11.1. It seems to be related to my XHCI USB port. I followed the
instructions here:
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Kernel_Crash_Dumps
but /proc/vmcore doesn't exist after I reboot the system after a
crash. I did notice that I
Dale wrote:
> > Why do you believe it has forked?
> > This project does not even has a source code repository and the fact that
> > they refer to illumos for sources makes me wonder whether it is open for
> > contributing.
> >
> > Jörg
> >
>
> Well, it seemed to me that it either changed its nam
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>
>> Grant wrote:
> Interesting news related to ZFS:
>
> http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Main_Page
I wonder if this will be added to the kernel at some point in the
future? May even be their intention?
>>> I think the CDDL license is what's keep
On 2013-09-19 3:44 AM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
You should definitely determine the right value for ashift on pool creation
(it controls the alignment on the medium). It's an option that you afaik can
only set
on filesystem creation and therefore needs a restart from scratch if you get it
wrong.
A
Hi,
When I try:
# emerge -uDNp world, I get this error:
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy
">=app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher-0.8:=" has unmet requirements.
- app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher-0.8-r2::gentoo USE="alsa espeak
python -ao -flite -nas -pulseaudio -static-libs"
PYTHON_TARGETS="
Dale wrote:
> Grant wrote:
> >>> Interesting news related to ZFS:
> >>>
> >>> http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Main_Page
> >> I wonder if this will be added to the kernel at some point in the
> >> future? May even be their intention?
> > I think the CDDL license is what's keeping ZFS out of the kernel,
Grant wrote:
> >> Interesting news related to ZFS:
> >>
> >> http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Main_Page
> >
> > I wonder if this will be added to the kernel at some point in the
> > future? May even be their intention?
>
> I think the CDDL license is what's keeping ZFS out of the kernel,
> although some
Am 19.09.2013 09:47, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
> Especially with SSDs. One must find out the blocksize used by his/her SSDs.
>
> With spinning disks, setting ashift=12 is enough since no spinning
> disks have sectors larger than 2^12 bytes.
>
> With SSDs, one might have to set ashift=13 or even ashi
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 09:49:40PM -0700, Grant wrote:
>> > I think many folks are interested in upgrading to EXT4 with RAID from
>> > an ordinary JBOD workstation(server); or better yet to ZFS on RAID. I wish
>> > one of the bright
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Dale wrote:
> Grant wrote:
Interesting news related to ZFS:
http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Main_Page
>>> I wonder if this will be added to the kernel at some point in the
>>> future? May even be their intention?
>> I think the CDDL license is what's keepi
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 09:49:40PM -0700, Grant wrote:
> > I think many folks are interested in upgrading to EXT4 with RAID from
> > an ordinary JBOD workstation(server); or better yet to ZFS on RAID. I wish
> > one of the brighter minds amongst us would put out a skeleton
> > (wiki) information p
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Grant wrote:
>> I think many folks are interested in upgrading to EXT4 with RAID from
>> an ordinary JBOD workstation(server); or better yet to ZFS on RAID. I wish
>> one of the brighter minds amongst us would put out a skeleton
>> (wiki) information page as such
Grant wrote:
>>> Interesting news related to ZFS:
>>>
>>> http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Main_Page
>> I wonder if this will be added to the kernel at some point in the
>> future? May even be their intention?
> I think the CDDL license is what's keeping ZFS out of the kernel,
> although some argue that i
39 matches
Mail list logo
