Hello, an addendum without digging up the details ...
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, David Haller wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>I've put five Samsung SATA drives into various things in the past few
>>years with flawless results. Samsung is one of the big manufacturers
>>of flash chips
james wrote:
> On 3/17/20 10:14 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 1:59 AM wrote:
>
>> Finally, ALL DRIVES FAIL. It doesn't matter what the underlying
>> storage technology is. I've seen hard drives fail in less than a
>> year, with the warranty replacement drive failing less tha
On 18/3/20 7:25 am, james wrote:
> On 3/17/20 10:14 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 1:59 AM wrote:
>
>> Finally, ALL DRIVES FAIL. It doesn't matter what the underlying
>> storage technology is. I've seen hard drives fail in less than a
I gave up trying to do fancy write min
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 19:23:53 -0400,
Dutch Ingraham wrote:
>
> On 3/17/20 4:16 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:00:59 -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> >
> >> Also from [1], with emphasis added "30_os-prober this script uses
> >> **os-prober to search for Linux** and other operatin
On 2020-03-17, David Haller wrote:
> And they produce and use their own controllers, so they additionally
> know the ins and outs of those, i.e. they can easily optimize the
> whole SSD from Flash-Chip over controller up to the firmware...
Yep, that was definitely the gist of my (wishful) thinki
On 3/17/20 10:14 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 1:59 AM wrote:
Finally, ALL DRIVES FAIL. It doesn't matter what the underlying
storage technology is. I've seen hard drives fail in less than a
year, with the warranty replacement drive failing less than a year
after that. I
On 3/17/20 4:16 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:00:59 -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
Also from [1], with emphasis added "30_os-prober this script uses
**os-prober to search for Linux** and other operating systems and places
the results in the GRUB 2 menu.
A review of the scripts
On 03/17/2020 04:51 PM, Michael wrote:
> Please do not top-post in this mailing list.
>
> On Tuesday, 17 March 2020 22:41:26 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> I have tried (doesn't work)
>>
>>
>> order allow,deny
>> allow from all
>>
>> # block spamers:
>> deny from huawei.com
>>
>>
>> I'm st
Please do not top-post in this mailing list.
On Tuesday, 17 March 2020 22:41:26 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I have tried (doesn't work)
>
>
> order allow,deny
> allow from all
>
> # block spamers:
> deny from huawei.com
>
>
> I'm still getting over 800-entires from: 114.119.128.0 - 11
I have tried (doesn't work)
order allow,deny
allow from all
# block spamers:
deny from huawei.com
I'm still getting over 800-entires from: 114.119.128.0 - 114.119.191.255
Thelma
On 03/17/2020 04:00 PM, Michael wrote:
> Require not ip 114.119.128.0/255.255.255.0
The below are not blocking those IP's :
deny from 114.119.128.0/24
deny from 114.119.128.0
Thelma
On 03/17/2020 04:00 PM, Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday, 17 March 2020 21:56:29 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> Will it work:
>> deny from 114.119.128.0/114.119.191.255
>>
>> Thelma
>
> It is better
I'm still using apache 2.2
So I think it should be:
deny from 114.119.128.0/24
With the:
Require all granted
Require not ip 114.119.128.0/24
I couldn't even access my own webpage from localhost.
Thelma
On 03/17/2020 04:00 PM, Michael wrote:
> On Tuesday, 17 March 2020 21:56:29 GMT th
On Tuesday, 17 March 2020 21:56:29 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Will it work:
> deny from 114.119.128.0/114.119.191.255
>
> Thelma
It is better to use this syntax:
Require all granted
Require not ip XX.XXX.XX.XXX
So your example address space becomes:
Require not ip 114.119.1
Will it work:
deny from 114.119.128.0/114.119.191.255
Thelma
On 03/17/2020 03:47 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> How to block in .htaccess file certain IP range?
>
> I have bot from huawei.com on my server for several days:
> IP: 114.119.128.0 - 114.119.191.255
> Or just block all China
>
How to block in .htaccess file certain IP range?
I have bot from huawei.com on my server for several days:
IP: 114.119.128.0 - 114.119.191.255
Or just block all China
--
Thelma
Hello,
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Grant Edwards wrote:
>I've put five Samsung SATA drives into various things in the past few
>years with flawless results. Samsung is one of the big manufacturers
>of flash chips, so I figure they should always end up with 1st choice
>quality chips in their own drives..
Hello,
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 10:43:58 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
>> >> The SSD is currently reporting 98% of its rated life left: I feel
>> >> quite confident it's going to outlast the laptop's useful life.
>> > What are you using to get that niformation?
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 12:33 PM Grant Edwards
wrote:
>
> I've put five Samsung SATA drives into various things in the past few
> years with flawless results. Samsung is one of the big manufacturers
> of flash chips, so I figure they should always end up with 1st choice
> quality chips in their o
I've put five Samsung SATA drives into various things in the past few
years with flawless results. Samsung is one of the big manufacturers
of flash chips, so I figure they should always end up with 1st choice
quality chips in their own drives...
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2020-03-17, Andrea Conti wrote:
>
>> "NAND flash" (as opposed to "NOR flash") refers to the way memory cells
>> are organized and connected. See for example
>> https://www.embedded.com/flash-101-nand-flash-vs-nor-flash/
>>
>> AFAIK all SSDs use some variant of NAND flas
On 2020-03-17, Andrea Conti wrote:
> "NAND flash" (as opposed to "NOR flash") refers to the way memory cells
> are organized and connected. See for example
> https://www.embedded.com/flash-101-nand-flash-vs-nor-flash/
>
> AFAIK all SSDs use some variant of NAND flash.
Correct. NOR flash densi
On 2020-03-17, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Same here. The main advantage of spinning HDs are that they are cheaper
> to replace when they fail. I only use them when I need lots of space.
Me too. If I didn't have my desktop set up as a DVR with 5TB of
recording space, I wouldn't have any spinning driv
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 1:59 AM wrote:
>
> The HD will contain the whole system including the complete root
> filesustem. Updateing, installing via Gentoo tools will run using
> the HD. If that process has ended, I will rsync the HD based root
> fileystem to the SSD.
> ...
I'll go ahead and write
My mobo is just old enough to not support NVMe drives. I checked on
that a while back. It'll be old school SDDs, well, the ones that mount
hardware wise like HDDs anyway. It's not like SDDs are really that old.
We're talking about interface standards here, not form factors. SATA
drives use
Okay, I'll give that a try. But I was really hoping for something
during the boot process.
On 2020-03-17 14:14, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:37:52 +0100, n952162 wrote:
Question 2: how can one see the output from the RC "e-trace" statements
(e.g. ebegin/eend)?
I don't find it
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:37:52 +0100, n952162 wrote:
> Question 2: how can one see the output from the RC "e-trace" statements
> (e.g. ebegin/eend)?
>
> I don't find it in /var/log/*
>
How about: openrc-run --verbose /etc/init.d/localmount start
Or use --debug for more info.
--
Neil Bothwick
Hello,
I see this msg in /var/log/dmesg:
[ 4.444826] EXT2-fs (sdb3): error: couldn't mount because of
unsupported optional features (2c0)
[ 4.468074] EXT4-fs (sdb3): mounted filesystem with ordered data
mode. Opts: (null)
but my system boots. Is the (2c0) the clue to what features are me
There's new information on this, and new questions...
I discovered that not only are my swaps not mounted, but the other
filesystems listed in /etc/fstab aren't, either.
These are, apparently, mounted by the localmount RC service.
Its status is *started*. But if I /restart/ it, then my fstab
f
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, March 17, 2020 5:18 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
>
> Hm. My NVMe boot drive doesn't show a lifetime attribute, but my two 1TB SSDs
> do, and they both show 100%, which makes me suspi
On Tuesday, 17 March 2020 09:43:58 GMT Andrea Conti wrote:
> On 17/03/20 10:03, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 09:35:10 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
> >> The SSD is currently reporting 98% of its rated life left: I feel quite
> >> confident it's going to outlast the laptop's useful life
On Tuesday, 17 March 2020 08:35:10 GMT Andrea Conti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > SSDs are a common replacement for HDs nowaday -- but I still trust my
> > HDs more than this "flashy" things...call me retro or oldschool, but
> > it my current "Bauchgefühl" (gut feeling).
>
> The days of shitty JMicron st
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 10:43:58 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
>
The SSD is currently reporting 98% of its rated life left: I feel
quite confident it's going to outlast the laptop's useful life.
>>> What are you using to get that niformation?
>> smartctl -A /dev/sdX
>
Andrea Conti wrote:
>> So, before I find a SDD to buy, what are some things I should look for
>> it to have and what are things I should avoid?
>
> I think the single most important thing is buying stuff from a
> reputable brand (there's quite a number of those by now). Look at
> reviews. Top-tier
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:15:58AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 17 March 2020 09:04:55 GMT Petr Vaněk wrote:
>
> > I use tmpfs to reduce compilation writes [1].
> >
> > tmpfs /var/tmp/portage/
> > tmpfs uid=portage,gid=portage,mode=0775,size=2G,noatime 0 0
On Tuesday, 17 March 2020 04:42:12 GMT Dale wrote:
> Matt Connell wrote:
> > On 2020-03-16 19:46, Dale wrote:
> >> Anything that can do, I can do locally by saving a web page or
> >> downloading the content.
Firefox has this functionality for people who have multiple devices and are
not able or
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 10:43:58 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
> >> The SSD is currently reporting 98% of its rated life left: I feel
> >> quite confident it's going to outlast the laptop's useful life.
> > What are you using to get that niformation?
>
> smartctl -A /dev/sdX
83% after five years of
On 17/03/20 10:03, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 09:35:10 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
The SSD is currently reporting 98% of its rated life left: I feel quite
confident it's going to outlast the laptop's useful life.
What are you using to get that niformation?
smartctl -A /dev/sdX
So, before I find a SDD to buy, what are some things I should look for
it to have and what are things I should avoid?
I think the single most important thing is buying stuff from a reputable
brand (there's quite a number of those by now). Look at reviews.
Top-tier performance probably isn't go
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:00:59 -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
> Also from [1], with emphasis added "30_os-prober this script uses
> **os-prober to search for Linux** and other operating systems and places
> the results in the GRUB 2 menu.
>
> A review of the scripts 10_linux and 30_os-prober supplied
On Tuesday, 17 March 2020 09:04:55 GMT Petr Vaněk wrote:
> I use tmpfs to reduce compilation writes [1].
>
> tmpfs /var/tmp/portage/
> tmpfs uid=portage,gid=portage,mode=0775,size=2G,noatime 0 0
> tmpfs /tmp/ tmpfs
mode=0777,size=1G,noexec,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 06:59:53AM +0100, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currentlu I am setting up a new PC for my 12-years old one,
> which has reached the limits of its "computational power" :)
>
> SSDs are a common replacement for HDs nowaday -- but I still trust my
> HDs more than this "fla
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 09:35:10 +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
> The SSD is currently reporting 98% of its rated life left: I feel quite
> confident it's going to outlast the laptop's useful life.
What are you using to get that niformation?
> That's not a single datapoint; every system I have around
Hello,
SSDs are a common replacement for HDs nowaday -- but I still trust my
HDs more than this "flashy" things...call me retro or oldschool, but
it my current "Bauchgefühl" (gut feeling).
The days of shitty JMicron stuff and OCZ drives dropping like flies are
long gone... you are not going t
On 3/16/20 3:47 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:51:06 -0500, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
Hi all. I'm having a problem with os-prober not finding other linux
partitions.
I'm on x86_64 and an old spinning drive with an msdos partition table
and 4 primary partitions, 3 linux and 1 swap
44 matches
Mail list logo
