On 8/2/21 10:26 PM, n952162 wrote:
> On 8/3/21 7:20 AM, n952162 wrote:
>> On 8/2/21 10:10 PM, David Haller wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2021, n952162 wrote:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
"dev-python/isodate[python_targets_python3_8(-)?,python_targets_python3_9(-)?]"
On 8/3/21 7:20 AM, n952162 wrote:
On 8/2/21 10:10 PM, David Haller wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 02 Aug 2021, n952162 wrote:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
"dev-python/isodate[python_targets_python3_8(-)?,python_targets_python3_9(-)?]"
have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is
On 8/2/21 10:10 PM, David Haller wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 02 Aug 2021, n952162 wrote:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
"dev-python/isodate[python_targets_python3_8(-)?,python_targets_python3_9(-)?]"
have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
Hello,
can someone explain why rR?
[ebuild rR ] virtual/perl-Pod-Parser-1.630.0-r8::gentoo 0 KiB
Why would this be happening?
r reinstall (forced for some reason, possibly due to
slot or sub-slot)
R replacing (remerging same version)
I had 181 packages
On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 18:42:29 -0400,
Michael wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Monday, 2 August 2021 22:17:35 BST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:01:40 +0100, Michael wrote:
> > > > I have this problem every month. Why does it fail? Is it just a
> > > > timeout because my network is slow?
On 3/8/21 6:03 am, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 02:12:24PM +0800 schrieb William Kenworthy:
> And you are storing several machines into a single repo? The docs say this
> is not supported officially. But I have one repo each for /, /home and
> data
> for
On 3/8/21 5:52 am, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 01:38:31PM +0800 schrieb William Kenworthy:
>
>>> Yup. Today I did my (not so) weekly backup and rsynced the repo to the new
>>> drive. After that I wanted to compare performance of my old 3 TB drive and
>>> the new SMR one
On Monday, 2 August 2021 22:17:35 BST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:01:40 +0100, Michael wrote:
> > > I have this problem every month. Why does it fail? Is it just a
> > > timeout because my network is slow? Can that be tweaked?
> >
> > I get this problem over here, but on rare
Am Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 02:12:24PM +0800 schrieb William Kenworthy:
> >>> And you are storing several machines into a single repo? The docs say this
> >>> is not supported officially. But I have one repo each for /, /home and
> >>> data
> >>> for both my PC and laptop. Using a wrapper script, I
Am Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 01:38:31PM +0800 schrieb William Kenworthy:
> > Yup. Today I did my (not so) weekly backup and rsynced the repo to the new
> > drive. After that I wanted to compare performance of my old 3 TB drive and
> > the new SMR one by deleting a snapshot from the repo on each drive.
On Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:01:40 +0100, Michael wrote:
> > I have this problem every month. Why does it fail? Is it just a
> > timeout because my network is slow? Can that be tweaked?
>
> I get this problem over here, but on rare occasions. Leaving it for
> half a day usually fixes it. Have
Hello,
On Mon, 02 Aug 2021, n952162 wrote:
>!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
>"dev-python/isodate[python_targets_python3_8(-)?,python_targets_python3_9(-)?]"
>have been masked.
>!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
>request:
>-
Sorry, I have to bitch.
This kept me going for several additional gentoo hours:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
"dev-python/isodate[python_targets_python3_8(-)?,python_targets_python3_9(-)?]"
have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
-
On 8/2/21 2:01 PM, Michael wrote:
On Monday, 2 August 2021 12:10:12 BST n952162 wrote:
On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote:
* Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine
...!!! Manifest verification failed:
Arve,
On Monday, 2021-08-02 13:54:07 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> Depends what you were trying to solve when piping to less.
Sorry for the confusion caused by dropping the "--ask" option (which is
part of my "edepclean" alias). What I'm trying to solve is reading the
output from "emerge
Ramon Fischer wrote:
> OK, if it could be "udev", you might want to try to check the following:
>
> $ grep -rF "" /etc/udev/rules.d/
> $ grep -rF "" /lib/udev/rules.d/
> $ grep -rF "" /etc
>
> You could also try to search for the partition device, maybe there
> will be some interesting
Michael wrote:
> On Monday, 2 August 2021 12:10:12 BST n952162 wrote:
>> On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote:
* Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine
...!!! Manifest verification failed:
On Monday, 2 August 2021 12:10:12 BST n952162 wrote:
> On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote:
> >>* Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine
> >>
> >> ...!!! Manifest verification failed:
> >>Manifest
On Mon, 2 Aug 2021 at 12:01, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> This caused me to make a mental note to always pipe the output from com-
> mand "emerge --depclean" into "less". However, this didn't work. There
> was only a single package to be removed causing "less" to simply termin-
> ate without
On 2021-08-02 09:20:19, n952162 wrote:
> On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote:
> >> * Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine
> >> ...!!! Manifest verification failed:
> >> Manifest mismatch for
On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote:
* Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine
...!!! Manifest verification failed:
Manifest mismatch for metadata/news/Manifest
I've raised this question before and the
Greetings,
On Tuesday, 2021-07-27 20:02:07 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> ...
>Heck, when I first ran --depclean, there
> were something like 220 packages to be removed. It would be very easy
> to have missed openrc. (Shameless plug) only my kernel patch which
>
> Just out of curiosity: on my system "emerge" always lists the packages
> that would be merged "in order" rather than "in reverse order". Where
> can this be configured?
>
>$ man emerge | grep reverse
>
> Only finds "reverse dependencies".
This happens when you pass -t or --tree. I
Greetings,
On Sunday, 2021-08-01 19:19:13 +0200, n952162 wrote:
> ...
> These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
Just out of curiosity: on my system "emerge" always lists the packages
that would be merged "in order" rather than "in reverse order". Where
can this be
On 8/2/21 9:20 AM, n952162 wrote:
On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote:
* Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine
...!!! Manifest verification failed:
Manifest mismatch for metadata/news/Manifest
I've
On 8/1/21 8:32 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 17:32 +0200, n952162 wrote:
* Verifying /var/db/repos/gentoo/.tmp-unverified-download-quarantine
...!!! Manifest verification failed:
Manifest mismatch for metadata/news/Manifest
I've raised this question before and the
On 8/2/21 9:16 AM, n952162 wrote:
I uninstalled blender (emerge -C) and now it's installing.
I mean, it's emerging @world.
On 8/1/21 9:05 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 20:02, n952162 wrote:
Ok, I'm sure I can manage that, thank you...
Can you clue me in, how you identified blender? I see it it forces
dev-python/requests, but that target is just one of 10 apparently
problem packages.
Your output
On 2/8/21 5:55 am, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 11:36:36AM +0800 schrieb William Kenworthy:
>
Its not raid, just a btrfs single on disk (no partition). Contains a
single borgbackup repo for an offline backup of all the online
borgbackup repo's I have for a 3
29 matches
Mail list logo
