Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:51:21 +0100
Maarten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back to the thread... I started wondering about something. I thought a
100% full root filesystem was deadly, but never thought about /tmp.
So I'd like to ask, what is more deadly for a system, a
kashani wrote:
Assuming it's a database server a full /tmp will cause some issues.
In how far? Neither Oracle nor MySQL write to /tmp. MySQL may create
a socket file, which by default resides in /tmp. But /tmp is a rather
bad place for such a file anyway...
Alexander Skwar
--
Alexander Skwar wrote:
kashani wrote:
Assuming it's a database server a full /tmp will cause some issues.
In how far? Neither Oracle nor MySQL write to /tmp. MySQL may create
a socket file, which by default resides in /tmp. But /tmp is a rather
bad place for such a file anyway...
Never
kashani wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
kashani wrote:
Assuming it's a database server a full /tmp will cause some issues.
In how far? Neither Oracle nor MySQL write to /tmp. MySQL may create
a socket file, which by default resides in /tmp. But /tmp is a rather
bad place for such a file
Alexander Skwar
snippage of pedantic nit picking and back peddling
Yes Mysql writes to /tmp by default and yes you can change it in which
case if that partition is full then you see the same behavior. So we can
say that Mysql really wants its temp space to have enough room for it to
write
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:23:51 +0100, Maarten wrote:
You suck AND you are wrong
I do not suck. YOU suck!
Do NOT!
Do TOO!
No you suck. And you are wrong...
Now what age-group type conversation does that remind you of...?
The Internet Age :(
--
Neil Bothwick
Windows Error #01: No
Ryan Tandy wrote:
Maarten wrote:
Or else, if /usr can be mounted
noexec without trouble, I'll donate 75 bogomips to the FSF.
Can we get that in writing, with a signature, creative use of {sym,hard}
links and nested mounts notwithstanding? ;)
Certainly ;-)
Oh well, it only
On 18 February 2006 15:05, Maarten wrote:
Ryan Tandy wrote:
Maarten wrote:
Or else, if /usr can be mounted
noexec without trouble, I'll donate 75 bogomips to the FSF.
Can we get that in writing, with a signature, creative use of {sym,hard}
links and nested mounts
Uwe Thiem wrote:
On 18 February 2006 15:05, Maarten wrote:
Ryan Tandy wrote:
Maarten wrote:
Oh well, it only amounts to 23 days of my Athlons' undivided attention.
I'll live. ;-)
23 days conpressed into one second. That will be the hard part. ;-)
Well, maybe. Depending on your
Hi,
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:51:21 +0100
Maarten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back to the thread... I started wondering about something. I thought a
100% full root filesystem was deadly, but never thought about /tmp.
So I'd like to ask, what is more deadly for a system, a full root FS, a
full /tmp
On Friday 17 February 2006 14:36, Rumen Yotov wrote:
Hi,
Please don't take this post as a signal for more battles.
IMHO there are many true facts from both of you.
Just a few point, as i have some (limited experience with hardened
systems).
1.For 2-3 years using portage-tree in /var/portage,
Eric Bliss wrote:
On Friday 17 February 2006 14:36, Rumen Yotov wrote:
Hi,
Please don't take this post as a signal for more battles.
IMHO there are many true facts from both of you.
Just a few point, as i have some (limited experience with hardened
systems).
1.For 2-3 years using portage-tree
Maarten wrote:
Or else, if /usr can be mounted
noexec without trouble, I'll donate 75 bogomips to the FSF.
Can we get that in writing, with a signature, creative use of {sym,hard}
links and nested mounts notwithstanding? ;)
Where trouble is defined as a system that won't run
13 matches
Mail list logo
