On 2006-12-06, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because some equery commands search for packages (ideally
suited for a regex), and others by design operate on a single
package (where using regexes don't make any sense).
But that differentiation seems purely artificial. What is
there
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 21:56 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-12-05, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's nasty. Why do some equery commands accept regexes and
others dont?
Because some equery commands search for packages (ideally
suited for a regex), and others by design
On 2006-12-05, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# equery list xorg | while read pkg; do equery size =${pkg}; done
That's nasty. Why do some equery commands accept regexes and
others dont?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Youth of today! Join
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 21:16, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-12-05, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# equery list xorg | while read pkg; do equery size =${pkg}; done
Bah.. The above was just for testing it before I sent it. For all packages it
should of course be:
# equery
Bo =?iso-8859-1?q?=D8rsted_Andresen?= writes:
--nextPart5713396.8Ph2VuCcD6
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 21:16, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-12-05, Bo =D8rsted Andresen
On 2006-12-05, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--nextPart5713396.8Ph2VuCcD6
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 21:16, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-12-05, Bo Ørsted
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 12:39:56 -0800, Bryan Green wrote:
Because equery isn't really being maintained. Lets just say it leaves
a lot
of room for improvement... Feel free to supply patches to improve
it...
Not maintained? I thought it was the tool of choice for what it does.
I thought it
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 22:26, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 12:39:56 -0800, Bryan Green wrote:
Because equery isn't really being maintained. Lets just say it leaves
a lot of room for improvement... Feel free to supply patches to improve
it...
Not maintained? I
On 2006-12-05, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's nasty. Why do some equery commands accept regexes and
others dont?
Because some equery commands search for packages (ideally
suited for a regex), and others by design operate on a single
package (where using regexes don't make
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 23:09:33 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
If I recall correctly Bryan is right about that there was a time when
equery was being pushed as the grand replacement for the portage-utils.
I think portage-utils has improved since then and as the gentoolkit
bugs has accumulated
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:56, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2006-12-05, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's nasty. Why do some equery commands accept regexes and
others dont?
Because some equery commands search for packages (ideally
suited for a regex), and others by design
11 matches
Mail list logo
