Don't most (all?) X apps depend on xorg-server?
Nope. No X app depends on the server, because the server could be running on
another machine.
Bye...
Dirk
Ah, bingo, thank you. I'll add xorg-server to world.
- Grant
Don't most (all?) X apps depend on xorg-server?
Nope. No X app depends on the server, because the server could be running on
another machine.
Bye...
Dirk
Ah, bingo, thank you. I'll add xorg-server to world.
- Grant
Actually, could xorg-x11 be a better choice for the world
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 21:20:17 Grant wrote:
Don't most (all?) X apps depend on xorg-server?
Nope. No X app depends on the server, because the server could be
running on another machine.
Bye...
Dirk
Ah, bingo, thank you. I'll add xorg-server to world.
- Grant
according to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml:
You could install the xorg-x11 metapackage instead of the more lightweight
xorg-server. Functionally, xorg-x11 and xorg-server are the same.
However, xorg-x11brings in many more packages that you probably don't need,
such as a huge
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't most (all?) X apps depend on xorg-server?
Nope. No X app depends on the server, because the server could be running on
another machine.
Bye...
Dirk
Ah, bingo, thank you. I'll add xorg-server to world.
-
Don't most (all?) X apps depend on xorg-server?
Nope. No X app depends on the server, because the server could be
running on another machine.
Bye...
Dirk
Ah, bingo, thank you. I'll add xorg-server to world.
- Grant
Actually, could xorg-x11 be a better choice for
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't most (all?) X apps depend on xorg-server?
Nope. No X app depends on the server, because the server could be
running on another machine.
Bye...
Dirk
Ah, bingo, thank you. I'll add xorg-server to
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't most (all?) X apps depend on xorg-server?
Nope. No X app depends on the server, because the server could be
running on another machine.
Bye...
Dirk
Ah, bingo, thank you. I'll add xorg-server to
Don't most (all?) X apps depend on xorg-server?
Nope. No X app depends on the server, because the server could be
running on another machine.
Bye...
Dirk
Ah, bingo, thank you. I'll add xorg-server to world.
- Grant
Actually, could xorg-x11 be a better choice for
Hi folks,
Can someone tell me what this means?
r...@smoker / # emerge -p --depclean
* Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious
* mistakes. Packages that are part of the world set will always
* be kept. They can be manually added to this set with
* `emerge
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 13:43:13 Dale wrote:
Hi folks,
Can someone tell me what this means?
r...@smoker / # emerge -p --depclean
* Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious
* mistakes. Packages that are part of the world set will always
* be kept. They
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Can someone tell me what this means?
r...@smoker / # emerge -p --depclean
* Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious
* mistakes. Packages that are part of the world set will always
* be
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Can someone tell me what this means?
r...@smoker / # emerge -p --depclean
* Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious
* mistakes. Packages that are part of the world
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 14:45:36 Dale wrote:
I'll report back if it continues after all this. Thanks to both Alan
and Mark on this one. I was getting drunk going around in circles with
this.
Let us know if USE=python really is the solution. I've been meaning to write
this up at
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Can someone tell me what this means?
r...@smoker / # emerge -p --depclean
* Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
Possibly scribus isn't compatible with python-2.6? The few times I've
run into this with depclean I've removed the app (scribus in this
case) cleaned up the machine with depclean
Dale wrote:
Yes, I ran python-updater after the last python upgrade which was a week
or so ago. I just hadn't ran --depclean yet. Needless to say, OOo just
had to be recompiled too. It always does. Usually, about a week later,
they have a upgrade for OOo which means I get to warm
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
Possibly scribus isn't compatible with python-2.6? The few times I've
run into this with depclean I've removed the app
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
You actually compile OO? Wow! OO-bin for me. Couple of minutes and
it's installed.
Same here. I compiled it for a long time (double meaning!), but when I
realized the amount of time spent compiling it was greater than the
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
You actually compile OO? Wow! OO-bin for me. Couple of minutes and
it's installed.
Same here. I compiled it for a long time (double
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
You actually compile OO? Wow! OO-bin for me. Couple of minutes and
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:40:05 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
Same here. I compiled it for a long time (double meaning!), but when I
realized the amount of time spent compiling it was greater than the
amount of time spent using it... I decided to go oo-bin as well.
You spend time compiling OOo? I
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:40:05 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
Same here. I compiled it for a long time (double meaning!), but when I
realized the amount of time spent compiling it was greater than the
amount of time spent using
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Mark Knecht
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
You actually compile OO? Wow! OO-bin for me. Couple of minutes and
it's installed.
Same here. I
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:29:10 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
Sure, of course I'm not staring at the gcc lines scrolling by, but it
gets in the way of compiling other things and causes unnecessary (in
my case) CPU and power load for a program I use only rarely.
Especially on slower machines, like my
james wrote:
OK,
So I just updated one of my system and all went fine.
I have not cleaned things up in a while, so I thought
I'd see what depclean says, know that I'm using kde4
and sets.
So I get a huge list, including lots of kde-base 4.2.2 packages.
Hmmm, something is not
Hi,
when I run emerge -p --depclen, I get these results:
[...]
These are the packages that would be unmerged:
x11-libs/qt
selected: 4.4.2
protected: none
omitted: 3.3.8b-r1
x11-libs/qt-assistant
selected: 4.4.2-r1
protected: none
omitted: none
Marc Blumentritt schrieb am 21.03.2009 14:33:
Hi,
when I run emerge -p --depclen, I get these results:
[...]
These are the packages that would be unmerged:
x11-libs/qt
selected: 4.4.2
protected: none
omitted: 3.3.8b-r1
x11-libs/qt-assistant
selected: 4.4.2-r1
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
emerge --update
--newuse --deep @system @world
Did you do that command? AFAIK depclean should only be done after
world has been fully updated.
I don't know what profile/arch you're running... On my system it was
recently upgraded
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
emerge --update
--newuse --deep @system @world
Did you do that command? AFAIK depclean should only be done after
world has been fully updated.
I don't know what profile/arch you're running... On
Hi,
I did my weekly updates last night and as always I run --depclean -p
afterwards to see if anything needs cleaning out. I seem to have ran
into something that doesn't make sense. This is what I get:
r...@smoker / # emerge -p --depclean
* Always study the list of packages to be cleaned
On Saturday 20 December 2008 08:27:40 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
emerge -av --depclean:
kde-base/kopete
selected: 3.5.10
protected: none
omitted: 4.1.3
kde-base/kget
selected: 3.5.10
protected: none
omitted: 4.1.3
emerge -av --depclean:
kde-base/kopete
selected: 3.5.10
protected: none
omitted: 4.1.3
kde-base/kget
selected: 3.5.10
protected: none
omitted: 4.1.3
kde-base/kmenuedit
selected: 3.5.10
protected: none
omitted: 4.1.3
The
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:31:18 -0600, Dale wrote:
I think there is a more elegant solution by using EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS
in make.conf.
grep EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS /etc/make.conf
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--with-bdeps y --nospinner
I have the same old make.conf I had from my original install about
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:31:18 -0600, Dale wrote:
I think there is a more elegant solution by using EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS
in make.conf.
grep EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS /etc/make.conf
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--with-bdeps y --nospinner
I have the same old make.conf I
Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--with-bdeps y --nospinner
I don't see the reason tough. Mine is just
$ fgrep DEFAULT /etc/make.conf
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--nospinner
The portage's default around bdeps is fine with me. It makes sense.
And please think before
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--with-bdeps y --nospinner
I don't see the reason tough. Mine is just
$ fgrep DEFAULT /etc/make.conf
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--nospinner
The portage's default around bdeps is
On Sunday 23 November 2008 06:23:41 Dale wrote:
I guess we need to add that option to make sure we are REALLY up to
date. Isn't there a way to tell a command to add options without typing
it in each time? Not just portage but any command. It may work well
for this. Than again, that may
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 23 November 2008 06:23:41 Dale wrote:
I guess we need to add that option to make sure we are REALLY up to
date. Isn't there a way to tell a command to add options without typing
it in each time? Not just portage but any command. It may work well
for this.
Dale schrieb am 23.11.2008 10:06:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 23 November 2008 06:23:41 Dale wrote:
I guess we need to add that option to make sure we are REALLY up to
date. Isn't there a way to tell a command to add options without typing
it in each time? Not just portage but any
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Dale schrieb am 23.11.2008 10:06:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 23 November 2008 06:23:41 Dale wrote:
I guess we need to add that option to make sure we are REALLY up to
date. Isn't there a way to tell a command to add options without typing
it
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Dale schrieb am 23.11.2008 11:31:
I think I got the information about --with-bdeps from here [1], so this
is all the information I have.
Also I am still on stable portage, while I guess you are not (as
/etc/make.conf.example is still in place), so I don't know if
Hi,
I did my weekly sync tonight and ran emerge -uvDN world afterwards. It
updated portage and a few other programs. I then wanted to check to see
if anything was no longer needed by using --depclean -p. Well, I got
this back:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -p --depclean
* Always study the
I had the same thing happen tonight. I just emerged:
perl-Module-Build
perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder
perl-Archive-Tar
virtual/perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS
virtual/perl-IO-Zlib
and then emerge --depclean worked.
-Chris
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I did my weekly
Chris Thomas wrote:
I had the same thing happen tonight. I just emerged:
perl-Module-Build
perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder
perl-Archive-Tar
virtual/perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS
virtual/perl-IO-Zlib
and then emerge --depclean worked.
-Chris
After hitting the send button, I thought about the
Hi,
Just doing a little house cleaning here. Sort of curious about this tho:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -p --depclean
SNIP the usual warning
Calculating dependencies... done!
Checking for lib consumers...
Assigning files to packages...
These are the packages that would be unmerged:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just doing a little house cleaning here. Sort of curious about this tho:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -p --depclean
SNIP
dev-lang/python
selected: 2.4.4-r13
protected: none
omitted: 2.5.2-r5
SNIP
[EMAIL
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just doing a little house cleaning here. Sort of curious about this tho:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -p --depclean
SNIP
dev-lang/python
selected: 2.4.4-r13
protected: none
omitted:
Hi,
Has emerge --depclean always removed older gentoo-sources or has
something changed? I don't remember this operation. Maybe I'm
forgetting something I already know on this subject but I'm drawing a
blank this afternoon.
I'm curious if there is a way to mask package from --depclean
On Wed, 14 May 2008 13:02:28 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Has emerge --depclean always removed older gentoo-sources or has
something changed? I don't remember this operation. Maybe I'm
forgetting something I already know on this subject but I'm drawing a
blank this afternoon.
I'm
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2008 13:02:28 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Has emerge --depclean always removed older gentoo-sources or has
something changed? I don't remember this operation. Maybe I'm
forgetting something I already know
It shows these versions of db:
sys-libs/db
selected: 1.85-r3 4.1.25_p1-r4 4.2.52_p4-r2 4.3.29-r2
protected: none
omitted: 4.5.20_p
while equery shows:
# equery depends sys-libs/db
[ Searching for packages depending on sys-libs/db... ]
dev-lang/perl-5.8.8-r4 (berkdb? sys-libs/db)
On Friday 04 January 2008, Mick wrote:
It shows these versions of db:
sys-libs/db
selected: 1.85-r3 4.1.25_p1-r4 4.2.52_p4-r2 4.3.29-r2
protected: none
omitted: 4.5.20_p
while equery shows:
# equery depends sys-libs/db
[ Searching for packages depending on sys-libs/db... ]
On Friday 04 January 2008, Dale wrote:
4.5.20_p satisfies all those listed DEPENDs, so it's OK to let
depclean do what it wants.
alan
I wouldn't say to do this for important stuff like Python or Perl
but I usually let depclean do its thing, as long as it is not a
critical package, then
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Friday 04 January 2008, Mick wrote:
It shows these versions of db:
sys-libs/db
selected: 1.85-r3 4.1.25_p1-r4 4.2.52_p4-r2 4.3.29-r2
protected: none
omitted: 4.5.20_p
while equery shows:
# equery depends sys-libs/db
[ Searching for packages
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Friday 04 January 2008, Dale wrote:
4.5.20_p satisfies all those listed DEPENDs, so it's OK to let
depclean do what it wants.
alan
I wouldn't say to do this for important stuff like Python or Perl
but I usually let depclean do its thing, as long as it is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Barkalow wrote:
I've been doing a lot of --depclean lately, and I've run into something
odd. emerge --depclean cross-avr/gcc wants to remove all 3 versions, but
it's in my world file. On the other hand, emerge --depclean doesn't want
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Barkalow wrote:
According to the man page, --prune will remove the old version that I want
to keep. I want to have 3.4.4-r1 and (currently) 4.2.2, but I don't care
about 4.1.2. When 4.2.3 comes out, I'll want that instead of 4.2.2.
The
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Barkalow wrote:
I've been doing a lot of --depclean lately, and I've run into something
odd. emerge --depclean cross-avr/gcc wants to remove all 3 versions, but
it's in my world file. On the
I've been doing a lot of --depclean lately, and I've run into something
odd. emerge --depclean cross-avr/gcc wants to remove all 3 versions, but
it's in my world file. On the other hand, emerge --depclean doesn't want
to remove any of them. I initially set this up with a crossdev that's now
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
I have just used depclean for the first time (I was afraid of it) after
several years of Gentoo. It has cleaned up my system a good bit but now
it wants to remove some packages that I'm concerned about:
gcc-3.4.6-r2 (I'm using 4.1.2)
libstdc++-v3-3.3.4 and
I have just used depclean for the first time (I was afraid of it) after
several years of Gentoo. It has cleaned up my system a good bit but now
it wants to remove some packages that I'm concerned about:
gcc-3.4.6-r2 (I'm using 4.1.2)
libstdc++-v3-3.3.4 and virtual/libstdc++
virtual/jdk and
On 10/16/07, Anthony E. Caudel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just used depclean for the first time (I was afraid of it) after
several years of Gentoo. It has cleaned up my system a good bit but now
it wants to remove some packages that I'm concerned about:
gcc-3.4.6-r2 (I'm using 4.1.2)
Hi,
Recently I noticed an inconsistency between the behavior of 'emerge
-n' and the advise shown while executing 'emerge --depclean'.
emerge --depclean -pv
===snip
Also study the list of packages to be cleaned for any
obvious mistakes. Packages that are part of the world
set will always be
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:39:56 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
localhost ~ # grep python /var/lib/portage/world ###(--No result)
localhost ~ # emerge --noreplace dev-lang/python
Calculating dependencies . . . ... done!
Auto-cleaning packages...
No outdated packages were found on
Am Mon, 3 Sep 2007 08:47:48 +0100
schrieb Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:39:56 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote:
localhost ~ # grep python /var/lib/portage/world ###(--No result)
localhost ~ # emerge --noreplace dev-lang/python
Calculating dependencies . . .
On Monday 03 September 2007 10:15:48 Marc Joliet wrote:
localhost ~ # grep python /var/lib/portage/world ###(--No result)
localhost ~ # emerge --noreplace dev-lang/python
[SNIP]
localhost ~ # grep python /var/lib/portage/world ###(--Still no
result) localhost ~ #
Python is part of
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:42:07 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Python is part of the system profile, so it doesn't need to be added
to world. Portage knows this.
While this is true --noreplace should still add it to world.
Why? When system is included in world?
On Monday 03 September 2007 11:58:27 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:42:07 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Python is part of the system profile, so it doesn't need to be added
to world. Portage knows this.
While this is true --noreplace should still add it to world.
Why?
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 12:14:58 +0200
Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 03 September 2007 11:58:27 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:42:07 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Python is part of the system profile, so it doesn't need to
be added to world. Portage
On 7/15/07, Thufir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/15/07, Kevin O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, guys. What about that kernel? I'm thinking it's probably not
the kernel I'm using, but I'm not positive.
thanks,
gentoo-sources-2.6.20-r8 for me.
[...]
Hi,
I'm facing a few last problems as I clean this machine up. The
machine is completely sync'ed and emerged. revdep-rebuild tells me
things are cool but then --depclean complains about needing
virtual/glibc and using emerge depends suggests it really is needed
but eix glibc doesn't show
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 02:04:12 Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm facing a few last problems as I clean this machine up. The
machine is completely sync'ed and emerged. revdep-rebuild tells me
things are cool but then --depclean complains about needing
virtual/glibc and using emerge depends
On 2/20/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 02:04:12 Mark Knecht wrote:
I'm facing a few last problems as I clean this machine up. The
machine is completely sync'ed and emerged. revdep-rebuild tells me
things are cool but then --depclean complains
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 03:47:05 Mark Knecht wrote:
Thanks for responding. I didn't know about that option or the
difference between how it's used for --depclean. Thanks.
I solved the lm_sensors one before your response came back.
Unfortunately --with-bdeps=y doesn't seem to identify
On 2/20/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 03:47:05 Mark Knecht wrote:
Thanks for responding. I didn't know about that option or the
difference between how it's used for --depclean. Thanks.
I solved the lm_sensors one before your response came back.
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 09:49:06 +0200, Daniel Iliev wrote:
emerge --depclean removes perl-core/DB_File.
emerge -DuN world installs perl-core/DB_File.
Add --tree to the second command.
--
Neil Bothwick
There is absolutely no substitute for a genuine lack of preparation.
signature.asc
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 09:49:06 +0200, Daniel Iliev wrote:
emerge --depclean removes perl-core/DB_File.
emerge -DuN world installs perl-core/DB_File.
Add --tree to the second command.
Here we go:
emerge -DuN --tree world -pv
These are the packages that
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:54:24 +0200, Daniel Iliev wrote:
Calculating world dependencies . . done!
[nomerge ] mail-client/squirrelmail-1.4.8 USE=crypt mysql nls
spell ssl vhosts -filter -ldap -postgres
[binary N] perl-core/DB_File-1.814
This looks like
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:54:24 +0200, Daniel Iliev wrote:
Calculating world dependencies . . done!
[nomerge ] mail-client/squirrelmail-1.4.8 USE=crypt mysql nls
spell ssl vhosts -filter -ldap -postgres
[binary N] perl-core/DB_File-1.814
Hi, group!
emerge --depclean removes perl-core/DB_File.
emerge -DuN world installs perl-core/DB_File.
equery d perl-core/DB_File
[ Searching for packages depending on perl-core/DB_File... ]
mail-client/squirrelmail-1.4.8
virtual/perl-DB_File-1.814
Since I don't want to pollute the world file
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:29:06 -0700, Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote:
If you run
emerge -av --noreplace
on all the packages that
emerge -av --depclean
wants to clean, then depclean will no longer complain.
This is equivalent to fixing low oil pressure in your car
On Sunday 30 July 2006 03:27, Richard Fish wrote:
But depclean wants to remove gnome-libs also, so this doesn't count...
Yep, bad example. I've got rid of both gnome-libs and imlib.
That one I saw, and it did add to the confusion.
libsoup does depend on gnutls, and gtkhtml depends on
On Sunday 30 July 2006 22:57, Richard Fish wrote:
Well I don't see anything obviously wrong. I would probably take a
look at the output of
emerge --debug --depclean --pretend world, and look for
net-libs/libsoup or gnome-base/gail. Both of them should appear as
dependancies of something.
On 7/30/06, Mike Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha! Got it!
Yep, that is definitely wacky. I would suggest to re-open this bug
and add your results to it:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67179
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
Check out this wackiness from depclean.
This has had me stumped all day, no matter how many merges, depcleans,
revdep-rebuilds I try.
It's long...
But, basically, depclean wants to remove packages that equery says have direct
dependencies.
If I merge all the packages that directly depend
On 7/29/06, Mike Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Check out this wackiness from depclean.
This has had me stumped all day, no matter how many merges, depcleans,
revdep-rebuilds I try.
It's long...
But, basically, depclean wants to remove packages that equery says have direct
On Sunday 30 July 2006 01:05, Richard Fish wrote:
But, basically, depclean wants to remove packages that equery says have
direct dependencies.
equery depends is unfortunately broken. It does not consider use flag
dependancies.
Ahh, now that I didn't know.
Examples from your list:
-
On 7/29/06, Mike Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gnome-libs does directly depend on imlib though.
But depclean wants to remove gnome-libs also, so this doesn't count...
That one I saw, and it did add to the confusion.
libsoup does depend on gnutls, and gtkhtml depends on libsoup, and
If you run
emerge -av --noreplace
on all the packages that
emerge -av --depclean
wants to clean, then depclean will no longer complain.
--- Vladimir
--
Vladimir G. Ivanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
In preparation for cleaning my world file, I ran emerge -p --depclean
world. It listed these packages to be removed:
app-crypt/gpgme
app-crypt/opencdk
app-text/rman
dev-libs/libtasn1
dev-libs/lzo
dev-python/pyxml
gnome-base/gail
net-libs/gnutls
net-libs/libsoup
perl-core/Storable
On 7/17/06, Anthony E. Caudel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that many of them are dependencies of virtual/x11 so I added
that to my world file, re-ran the --depclean and this time got only
about half the recommendations. Was adding virtual/x11 to my world file
the proper thing to do?
Richard Fish wrote:
On 7/17/06, Anthony E. Caudel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that many of them are dependencies of virtual/x11 so I added
that to my world file, re-ran the --depclean and this time got only
about half the recommendations. Was adding virtual/x11 to my world file
the
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to clean my install (one year old, so it's time to do it). I run an
update, and run :
emerge --newuse -Dvu world
It installs a lot of update and so on and do everything ok.
Afterwards, I run :
revdep-rebuild
It makes a lot of rebuild about some broken link, I also
Sébastien MORAND wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm trying to clean my install (one year old, so it's time to do it). I run an
update, and run :
emerge --newuse -Dvu world
It installs a lot of update and so on and do everything ok.
Afterwards, I run :
revdep-rebuild
It makes a lot of rebuild about
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:59:24 +0200, Sébastien MORAND wrote:
Now I try the dangerous following command as describe in the
documentation : emerge --depclean -p (just to see what should be done)
And then I'm quite surprise, 41 packages should be removed, and among
them, a lot of usefull lib or
And then I'm quite surprise, 41 packages should be removed, and among them, a
lot of usefull lib or tool (perl-ldap, xinetd, and so on ...)
Is this result normal ? What did I miss ?
1. it might be old stuff that really isn't needed anymore, as already
mentioned by others
2. portage up to
On Friday 19 August 2005 06:08 am, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:59:24 +0200, Sébastien MORAND wrote:
Now I try the dangerous following command as describe in the
documentation : emerge --depclean -p (just to see what should be done)
And then I'm quite surprise, 41 packages
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 07:03:52 -0400, Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
Where do we easily find a list of necessary files, system files
etc... so we dont inaverdently remove them? For instance I am using
udev for some time now, can I let depclean remove devfsd?
They will be defined in your profile,
101 - 200 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
