On Tuesday 23 Aug 2016 11:32:40 I wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 Aug 2016 11:10:40 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > As long as the source file is still in $DISTDIR, you don't need to do
> > anything.
> > You could put the file somewhere; personal web space, github
> > etc, and change the SRC_URI to point to it, bu
On Wednesday 24 Aug 2016 11:57:04 Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> > On Monday 22 Aug 2016 21:08:56 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:59:41 +, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> > I really don't understand the urgency in treecleaning gummiboo
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 22 Aug 2016 21:08:56 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:59:41 +, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> > I really don't understand the urgency in treecleaning gummiboot.
>> > Like grub1, it will still work in 10 years time...
>>
>
On Tuesday 23 Aug 2016 21:00:47 Mick wrote:
> I have built a UEFI system with no initramfs (I don't need it), or
> systemd (I don't want it), or any assisting boot manager. I have been
> happily using the EFI kernel stub and on the rare occasion I need to boot
> an alternative kernel I press F2 (
On Tuesday 23 Aug 2016 15:06:03 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 Aug 2016 08:21:36 Michael Mol wrote:
> > If you're not frequently jumping to a non-default boot environment, it's
> > fine.
>
> That's my problem: I do often want to start a minimal system. As I said
> before not far from here,
On Tuesday 23 Aug 2016 08:21:36 Michael Mol wrote:
> If you're not frequently jumping to a non-default boot environment, it's
> fine.
That's my problem: I do often want to start a minimal system. As I said
before not far from here, any time a substantial update is needed,
especially if it invol
On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 10:41:50 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 Aug 2016 05:18:02 Tom H wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Peter Humphrey
>
> wrote:
> > > Following today's marking of gummiboot as to be deleted in a month, I
> > > had a look at efibootmgr in the wiki pages.
On Tuesday 23 Aug 2016 11:10:40 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> As long as the source file is still in $DISTDIR, you don't need to do
> anything.
> You could put the file somewhere; personal web space, github
> etc, and change the SRC_URI to point to it, but that's not really
> necessary.
Can a SRC_URI be
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:15:16 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > I really don't understand the urgency in treecleaning gummiboot.
> > > Like grub1, it will still work in 10 years time...
> >
> > I agree, just copy it to a local overlay.
>
> How would I manage the distfile, which at present is
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:12 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Monday, August 22, 2016 02:59:55 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Håkon Alstadheim
>>
>> wrote:
>> > Booting straight into linux on an EFI system without a boot-loader means
>> > you have no way to provide command
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Håkon Alstadheim
> wrote:
>> Booting straight into linux on an EFI system without a boot-loader means
>> you have no way to provide command-line or initramfs as far as I can
>> tell, all modules must be comp
On Tuesday 23 Aug 2016 05:18:02 Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
> > Following today's marking of gummiboot as to be deleted in a month, I
> > had a look at efibootmgr in the wiki pages. It looks as though I'll be
> > able to use it instead, but one thing puz
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> Following today's marking of gummiboot as to be deleted in a month, I had a
> look at efibootmgr in the wiki pages. It looks as though I'll be able to use
> it instead, but one thing puzzles me: is it possible to create a set of
> configs
On Monday 22 Aug 2016 21:08:56 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:59:41 +, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > I really don't understand the urgency in treecleaning gummiboot.
> > Like grub1, it will still work in 10 years time...
>
> I agree, just copy it to a local overlay.
How would I manag
On Monday, August 22, 2016 02:59:55 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Håkon Alstadheim
>
> wrote:
> > Booting straight into linux on an EFI system without a boot-loader means
> > you have no way to provide command-line or initramfs as far as I can
> > tell, all modules mus
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> I've no idea how tightly bootctl (as gummibot is now called after its
> assimilation in the the systemd collective) is bound to systemd. It may
> well be feasible to create an ebuild that builds bootctl from the systemd
> sources without th
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:59:41 +, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> I really don't understand the urgency in treecleaning gummiboot.
> Like grub1, it will still work in 10 years time...
I agree, just copy it to a local overlay. If a serious bug does arise,
you then have the choice of trying to persuade so
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Håkon Alstadheim
wrote:
>
> Booting straight into linux on an EFI system without a boot-loader means
> you have no way to provide command-line or initramfs as far as I can
> tell, all modules must be compiled in, and default command-line needs to
> be set in the ke
Den 22. aug. 2016 17:05, skrev Peter Humphrey:
> Hello list,
>
> Following today's marking of gummiboot as to be deleted in a month, I had a
> look at efibootmgr in the wiki pages. It looks as though I'll be able to use
> it instead, but one thing puzzles me: is it possible to create a set of
>
On 08/22/2016 08:59 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> I really don't understand the urgency in treecleaning gummiboot.
> Like grub1, it will still work in 10 years time...
>
> --
> Joost
>
I agree, I still use grub1 on most my installs. No EFI (computers are
old) and just haven't bothered going to so
On August 22, 2016 5:05:10 PM GMT+02:00, Peter Humphrey
wrote:
>Hello list,
>
>Following today's marking of gummiboot as to be deleted in a month, I
>had a
>look at efibootmgr in the wiki pages. It looks as though I'll be able
>to use
>it instead, but one thing puzzles me: is it possible to cre
Hello list,
Following today's marking of gummiboot as to be deleted in a month, I had a
look at efibootmgr in the wiki pages. It looks as though I'll be able to use
it instead, but one thing puzzles me: is it possible to create a set of
configs for several kernels, the way gummiboot does in
/b
22 matches
Mail list logo