[gentoo-user] KDE-4.1.3 + KDE-3.5.9 = messed up KDEDIRS ?

2008-11-12 Thread Dmitry S. Makovey
Hi everybody, I've just updated to 4.1.3 (slotted alongside with 3.5.9) and all of sudden konqueror and akregator (didn't test much more, but I'm sure something else was broke too) stopped launching hinting that there is a CSS version mistmatch blah-blah-blah. Path to CSS suggested that 4.1.3

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-4.1.3 + KDE-3.5.9 = messed up KDEDIRS ?

2008-11-12 Thread Peter Alfredsen
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I've just updated to 4.1.3 (slotted alongside with 3.5.9) and all of > sudden konqueror and akregator (didn't test much more, but I'm sure > something else was broke too) stopped launching hinting that there is > a CSS vers

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-4.1.3 + KDE-3.5.9 = messed up KDEDIRS ?

2008-11-12 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch 12 November 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Wednesday 12 November 2008 18:31:41 Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > I've just updated to 4.1.3 (slotted alongside with 3.5.9) and all of > > sudden konqueror and akregator (didn't test much more, but I'm sure > > something e

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-4.1.3 + KDE-3.5.9 = messed up KDEDIRS ?

2008-11-12 Thread Dmitry S. Makovey
On November 12, 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Wednesday 12 November 2008 18:31:41 Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > I've just updated to 4.1.3 (slotted alongside with 3.5.9) and all of > > sudden konqueror and akregator (didn't test much more, but I'm sure > > something else was

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-4.1.3 + KDE-3.5.9 = messed up KDEDIRS ?

2008-11-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 18:31:41 Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I've just updated to 4.1.3 (slotted alongside with 3.5.9) and all of sudden > konqueror and akregator (didn't test much more, but I'm sure something else > was broke too) stopped launching hinting that there is a CS

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-4.1.3 + KDE-3.5.9 = messed up KDEDIRS ?

2008-11-12 Thread Dmitry S. Makovey
On November 12, 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > I had something similar on my first try: > > > > kde-4 went into /usr > > kde-3 went into /usr/kde/3.5 > > > > And bizarre weird errors kept happening. I remerged all of kde-4 with > > USE="kdeprefix" to put it back into /usr/kde/4.1 and all the

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-4.1.3 + KDE-3.5.9 = messed up KDEDIRS ?

2008-11-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 22:31:52 Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: > On November 12, 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > I had something similar on my first try: > > > > > > kde-4 went into /usr > > > kde-3 went into /usr/kde/3.5 > > > > > > And bizarre weird errors kept happening. I remerged all

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-4.1.3 + KDE-3.5.9 = messed up KDEDIRS ?

2008-11-12 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch 12 November 2008, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: > On November 12, 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > I had something similar on my first try: > > > > > > kde-4 went into /usr > > > kde-3 went into /usr/kde/3.5 > > > > > > And bizarre weird errors kept happening. I remerged all of kde-4

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-4.1.3 + KDE-3.5.9 = messed up KDEDIRS ?

2008-11-12 Thread Dmitry S. Makovey
On November 12, 2008, Peter Alfredsen wrote: > On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > I've just updated to 4.1.3 (slotted alongside with 3.5.9) and all of > > sudden konqueror and akregator (didn't test much more, but I'm sure > > something else was broke

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-4.1.3 + KDE-3.5.9 = messed up KDEDIRS ?

2008-11-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 23:11:35 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > why? the FHS is a stupid standard. Why is following stupid standards a good > thing? What next? LSB compliance - because it is great to be broken by > definition? Why is FHS stupid? I haven't read it fully since 2006 but at the t

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE-4.1.3 + KDE-3.5.9 = messed up KDEDIRS ?

2008-11-12 Thread Dmitry S. Makovey
On November 12, 2008, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > wouldn't call it stupid though. FHS compliance is a good thing (I'm a > > sysadmin so I really appreciate when things can be easily located > > universaly). > > why? the FHS is a stupid standard. Why is following stupid standards a good > thing?