On 12/30/2015 11:16 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> right now gcc rebuilds itself, some more packages to re-emerge, load at
> around 7.5, system usable, audio stream without a hickup.
# genlop -t thunderbird
* mail-client/thunderbird
Mon Jan 4 22:55:49 2016 >>> mail-client/thunderbird-38.
On 12/30/2015 08:00 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Would using gcc-5.x make a noticeable difference?
Well, while you all are preparing to reply ...
;-)
... I simply went for it.
unmasked gcc-5.3.0, compiled it, and then recompiled @system and the
kernel ("make localmodconfig" to be curious)
On 12/15/2015 03:02 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 2015-12-13 um 13:05 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>> Am 2015-12-13 um 12:50 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>> If I pull the mouse down to the bottom of the screen the desktop snaps
>>> into correct place.
For the records and ml-archives:
a
Am 2015-12-13 um 13:05 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 2015-12-13 um 12:50 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
If I pull the mouse down to the bottom of the screen the desktop snaps
into correct place.
found this:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7800470.html
the module option is now "enable
Am 2015-12-13 um 12:50 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> If I pull the mouse down to the bottom of the screen the desktop snaps
> into correct place.
found this:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7800470.html
the module option is now "enable_ips=0" ... but this doesn't work for me
so far.
Am 2015-12-13 um 11:39 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Right now I am fiddling with getting Gnome installed and running.
I have X starting now. gdm as well, but with problems:
the mouse somehow pulls a "curtain" up and down ... so the display is
not correct. The lower part is one color only so I
Am 2015-12-11 um 10:33 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
> Am 10.12.2015 um 19:52 schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org:
>
>>> Do I have to set that variable then (in make.conf?) ?
>>
>> Yes, you should. While you're at it, you can remove the corresponding
>> flags from the USE= variable. I don't know if
Am 10.12.2015 um 19:52 schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org:
>> Do I have to set that variable then (in make.conf?) ?
>
> Yes, you should. While you're at it, you can remove the corresponding
> flags from the USE= variable. I don't know if they're honored by
> portage any longer. I assume you misse
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 07:46:51AM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote
> Am 10.12.2015 um 05:50 schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org:
>
> > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-unwind-tables
> > -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables"
> >
> > That's what I use, except for cross-compiling.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 07:46:51AM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 10.12.2015 um 05:50 schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org:
>
> > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-unwind-tables
> > -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables"
> >
> > That's what I use, except for cross-compiling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 09.12.2015 um 23:44 schrieb Mick:
> On Wednesday 09 Dec 2015 20:39:30 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>> Ordered today. Looking forward .. It will be triple-boot: gentoo,
>> fedora, win10 (as I paid for it)
>
> If you bought it in EU you can ask for
Am 10.12.2015 um 05:50 schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org:
> CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-unwind-tables
> -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables"
>
> That's what I use, except for cross-compiling. For an explanation of
> the "unwind" flags, see thread...
> http://comments.gma
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:03:23PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote
> Am 2015-12-09 um 22:49 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
>
> > Sounds like you're all set to use that i7 to it's fullest :-)
>
> most of my work is terminal stuff ... and email
>
> the i7-2600 does that as well, if we are honest!
>
> I
On Wednesday 09 Dec 2015 20:39:30 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Ordered today. Looking forward ..
> It will be triple-boot: gentoo, fedora, win10 (as I paid for it)
If you bought it in EU you can ask for the cost of Win10 back. There was an
case brought in France (against Dell I think) and it wa
Am 2015-12-09 um 22:49 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> Sounds like you're all set to use that i7 to it's fullest :-)
most of my work is terminal stuff ... and email
the i7-2600 does that as well, if we are honest!
I will give the i7-2xxx to someone with a way older CPU ... so it all
works out in a way
On 09/12/2015 23:24, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 2015-12-09 um 21:42 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
>
>> Did you get an SSD as well?
>
> sure. I even look for the PCIe variant (just contacted my dealer for
> this option ... forgot in the first place).
>
> I am on SSDs for years now on desktop and l
Am 2015-12-09 um 21:42 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> Did you get an SSD as well?
sure. I even look for the PCIe variant (just contacted my dealer for
this option ... forgot in the first place).
I am on SSDs for years now on desktop and laptops.
> It's one of the biggest performance improvements you
On 09/12/2015 22:39, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 2015-12-02 um 23:13 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>>
>> I consider buying a new machine for my office in december.
>>
>> The intel core-i7-6xxx look interesting to me, although the plain CPU
>> performance isn't that much better than my plain ol
Am 2015-12-02 um 23:13 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
> I consider buying a new machine for my office in december.
>
> The intel core-i7-6xxx look interesting to me, although the plain CPU
> performance isn't that much better than my plain old i7-2600 when I look
> at cpunbenchmark.net
>
> I as
I consider buying a new machine for my office in december.
The intel core-i7-6xxx look interesting to me, although the plain CPU
performance isn't that much better than my plain old i7-2600 when I look
at cpunbenchmark.net
I assume the overall package makes more difference: DDR4-RAM, etc etc
Do
20 matches
Mail list logo
