On Friday 30 May 2014 06:34:13 Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 29 May 2014 23:32:55 William Kenworthy wrote:
> > I am not using systemd either - there is no bluetoothctl service (its an
> > application and written with no remote control capabilities - why?: no
> > idea - in my reading I came across a mes
On Thursday 29 May 2014 23:32:55 William Kenworthy wrote:
> I am not using systemd either - there is no bluetoothctl service (its an
> application and written with no remote control capabilities - why?: no
> idea - in my reading I came across a message saying that its designed
> for use with syste
On 29/05/14 18:18, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 29 May 2014 07:27:24 Mick wrote:
>> On Thursday 29 May 2014 00:05:16 William Kenworthy wrote:
>>> On 29/05/14 06:28, Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 28 May 2014 20:02:29 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 28/05/14 21:42, Mick wrote:
>> Hmm ... am I alone
On Thursday 29 May 2014 07:27:24 Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 29 May 2014 00:05:16 William Kenworthy wrote:
> > On 29/05/14 06:28, Mick wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 28 May 2014 20:02:29 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > >> On 28/05/14 21:42, Mick wrote:
> > >>> Hmm ... am I alone in this quest?
> > >>
> > >> S
On Thursday 29 May 2014 00:05:16 William Kenworthy wrote:
> On 29/05/14 06:28, Mick wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 May 2014 20:02:29 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> On 28/05/14 21:42, Mick wrote:
> >>> Hmm ... am I alone in this quest?
> >>
> >> See here, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505362
> >
On 29/05/14 06:28, Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 May 2014 20:02:29 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 28/05/14 21:42, Mick wrote:
>>> Hmm ... am I alone in this quest?
>>
>> See here, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505362
>
> Thanks! I missed this bug when I glanced earlier. However, it does n
On Wednesday 28 May 2014 20:02:29 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 28/05/14 21:42, Mick wrote:
> > Hmm ... am I alone in this quest?
>
> See here, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505362
Thanks! I missed this bug when I glanced earlier. However, it does not
mention rfcomm is now missing, or t
On 28/05/14 21:42, Mick wrote:
> Hmm ... am I alone in this quest?
See here, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505362
On Sunday 27 Apr 2014 08:27:31 William Kenworthy wrote:
> On 04/27/14 11:14, William Kenworthy wrote:
> > On 04/27/14 02:33, Mick wrote:
> >> On Thursday 24 Apr 2014 02:11:57 William Kenworthy wrote:
> >>> I was able to get it working manually - gentoo's init scripts are out
> >>> of date with blue
On 04/27/14 11:14, William Kenworthy wrote:
> On 04/27/14 02:33, Mick wrote:
>> On Thursday 24 Apr 2014 02:11:57 William Kenworthy wrote:
>>
>>> I was able to get it working manually - gentoo's init scripts are out of
>>> date with bluez 5, blutoothctl is broken (or probably just poorly
>>> documen
On 04/27/14 02:33, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 24 Apr 2014 02:11:57 William Kenworthy wrote:
>
>> I was able to get it working manually - gentoo's init scripts are out of
>> date with bluez 5, blutoothctl is broken (or probably just poorly
>> documented which equates to the same thing if the command
On Thursday 24 Apr 2014 02:11:57 William Kenworthy wrote:
> I was able to get it working manually - gentoo's init scripts are out of
> date with bluez 5, blutoothctl is broken (or probably just poorly
> documented which equates to the same thing if the command doesn't work) .
>
> In bluetoothctl:
On 04/24/14 01:06, James wrote:
> William Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
>
>
>> The bluez-5 stack is causing me some problems.
>> What am I missing/misunderstanding?
>
> These wireless protocols, have many versions (variants) and
> nuances via the prticular hardware that is used. Some light
William Kenworthy iinet.net.au> writes:
> The bluez-5 stack is causing me some problems.
> What am I missing/misunderstanding?
These wireless protocols, have many versions (variants) and
nuances via the prticular hardware that is used. Some light
reading might better postion you?
https://w
14 matches
Mail list logo
