One of the reasons for which I switched to Gentoo two years ago was the
fact from all the distributions out there, Gentoo was one of the fastest
to provide a KDE build for the stable version, as soon as KDE team did a
new new release.
I am "emerge sync"-ing almost daily and still there is no K
Radu Filip wrote:
> One of the reasons for which I switched to Gentoo two years ago was the
> fact from all the distributions out there, Gentoo was one of the fastest
> to provide a KDE build for the stable version, as soon as KDE team did a
> new new release.
>
> I am "emerge sync"-ing almost dai
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:51:55 +0200 (EET), Radu Filip wrote:
> As an ultimate solution, how "stable" is the testing build of KFDE
> 3.4.3-r1?
No idea, but 3.5.0_beta2 is solid here :)
--
Neil Bothwick
I must have slipped a disk; my pack hurts.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Radu Filip wrote:
> As an ultimate solution, how "stable" is the testing build of
> KFDE 3.4.3-r1?
Rock solid here. (But you may first want to inspect open KDE 3.4.2
and 3.4.3 bugs on https://bugs.gentoo.org/ and see if any of those
are likely to affect you.)
Benno
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org m
> No idea, but 3.5.0_beta2 is solid here :)
I wanted to switch to 3.5.0_beta2 too, but:
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "~kde-base/libkpgp-3.5.0_beta2".
(dependency required by "kde-base/certmanager-3.5.0_beta2" [ebuild])
I think kde 3.5.0_beta2 isn't a full release yet or hasn't been wel
Peper schrieb:
>> No idea, but 3.5.0_beta2 is solid here :)
> I wanted to switch to 3.5.0_beta2 too, but:
>
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "~kde-base/libkpgp-3.5.0_beta2".
> (dependency required by "kde-base/certmanager-3.5.0_beta2" [ebuild])
http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 00:34:09 +0100, Peper wrote:
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "~kde-base/libkpgp-3.5.0_beta2".
> (dependency required by "kde-base/certmanager-3.5.0_beta2" [ebuild])
According to the certmanager ebuild, it only depends on beta1, which is
available.
> I think kde 3.5.
On Friday 04 November 2005 00:34, Peper wrote:
> > No idea, but 3.5.0_beta2 is solid here :)
>
> I wanted to switch to 3.5.0_beta2 too, but:
>
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "~kde-base/libkpgp-3.5.0_beta2".
> (dependency required by "kde-base/certmanager-3.5.0_beta2" [ebuild])
if you'd
> > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "~kde-base/libkpgp-3.5.0_beta2".
> > (dependency required by "kde-base/certmanager-3.5.0_beta2" [ebuild])
>
> According to the certmanager ebuild, it only depends on beta1, which is
> available.
No, i think that you are misreading the ebuild. I haven't ch
> > > No idea, but 3.5.0_beta2 is solid here :)
> >
> > I wanted to switch to 3.5.0_beta2 too, but:
> >
> > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "~kde-base/libkpgp-3.5.0_beta2".
> > (dependency required by "kde-base/certmanager-3.5.0_beta2" [ebuild])
>
> if you'd used the 'monolithic' (I like to
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 15:25:15 +0100, Peper wrote:
> > According to the certmanager ebuild, it only depends on beta1, which
> > is available.
> No, i think that you are misreading the ebuild. I haven't chagned a
> single thing in it and emerge reports above error.
It emerges OK here, so it would ap
> It looks like they changed the naming between beta1 and beta2, but the
> ebuild appears to take this into account.
Sorry for saying thtat you are misreading the ebuilds.
I have just figured out how it works, but i think that is misleading:
Unless you unmask the libkpgp package, emerge reports m
12 matches
Mail list logo
