On Monday 11 Jan 2016 20:10:53 Stroller wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 January 2016, at 6:48 p.m., waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> > The other problem is that HTML5 sucks up more CPU for video. My data
> >
> > point with an ancient underpowered Atom netbook watching a Youtube music
> > video https://www.y
> On Mon, 11 January 2016, at 6:48 p.m., waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
>
> The other problem is that HTML5 sucks up more CPU for video. My data
> point with an ancient underpowered Atom netbook watching a Youtube music
> video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwqhdRs4jyA
>
> Flash
> =
> 1) R
On Sunday 10 Jan 2016 18:39:43 Ian Bloss wrote:
> You can install pepperflash to chromium although it's proprietary. Google
> Chrome has pepper flash by default
For Chromium you can install:
www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signe
You can install pepperflash to chromium although it's proprietary. Google
Chrome has pepper flash by default
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016, 10:54 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 10 January 2016 12:25:41 Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
> > Adobe Flash remains a bitter reality on mlb.com, nfl.com, wfpl.org, AT&T
On Sunday 10 January 2016 12:25:41 Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Adobe Flash remains a bitter reality on mlb.com, nfl.com, wfpl.org, AT&T
> Uverse, among others.
... bbc.co.uk ...
--
Rgds
Peter
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I keep getting a warning that Flash needs to be upgraded. I went to
> packages.g.o and there doesn't seem to be a newer version than what I
> have. What gives? I'd upgrade if there was one available but there
> isn't or I can't find it
> I keep getting a warning that Flash needs to be upgraded. I went to
> packages.g.o and there doesn't seem to be a newer version than what I
> have. What gives? I'd upgrade if there was one available but there
> isn't or I can't find it one. I found a bug report on the version I
> have instal
Howdy,
I keep getting a warning that Flash needs to be upgraded. I went to
packages.g.o and there doesn't seem to be a newer version than what I
have. What gives? I'd upgrade if there was one available but there
isn't or I can't find it one. I found a bug report on the version I
have installed
On Friday 23 Oct 2015 10:24:42 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 22 October 2015 21:38:50 Marc Joliet wrote:
> > Personally, I actually uninstalled adobe-flash almost exactly two weeks
> > and 2 hours ago :-) . I haven't really missed it, and youtube-dl (well,
> > mpv's built-in youtube-dl suppo
On Thursday 22 October 2015 21:38:50 Marc Joliet wrote:
> Personally, I actually uninstalled adobe-flash almost exactly two weeks and
> 2 hours ago :-) . I haven't really missed it, and youtube-dl (well, mpv's
> built-in youtube-dl support) helps with the few sites that still don't
> support HTML
On четверг, 22 октября 2015 г. 22:38:50 MSK, Marc Joliet wrote:
I tried that a good while ago, but at the time I had no luck.
However, that
was a few years ago.
Personally, I actually uninstalled adobe-flash almost exactly
two weeks and 2
hours ago :-) . I haven't really missed it, and you
On Thursday 22 October 2015 18:01:10 James wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I was just reading about "lighspark" [1] and at first glance, it seems
>to be a replacement for adobe flash with support for the latest
>features. Lightspark can be found with::
>'eix -R lightspark'
>
>
>You may also need to run 'eix-remo
Hello,
I was just reading about "lighspark" [1] and at first glance, it seems
to be a replacement for adobe flash with support for the latest
features. Lightspark can be found with::
'eix -R lightspark'
You may also need to run 'eix-remote update' if you have not updated
that database of extend
OK, thanks -- its here now, just a slow mirror.
Adam Carter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:14 PM, wrote:
>
> > That version is not available after a sync a couple of hours ago.
> >
>
> https://packages.gentoo.org/package/www-plugins/adobe-flash
>
> Try a different mirror.
>
> -
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:14 PM, wrote:
> That version is not available after a sync a couple of hours ago.
>
https://packages.gentoo.org/package/www-plugins/adobe-flash
Try a different mirror.
That version is not available after a sync a couple of hours ago.
Walter Dnes wrote:
> Adobe has released adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 for linux, and it is now
> available as an ebuild. Thanks to the devs for a quick turnaround with
> the ebuild. It is important to update, because a zero-day ex
Adobe has released adobe-flash-11.2.202.481 for linux, and it is now
available as an ebuild. Thanks to the devs for a quick turnaround with
the ebuild. It is important to update, because a zero-day exploit was
discovered in the 400 gigabytes of data from the "Hacking Team" hack.
And yes, it can
On Saturday 26 July 2014 10:46:35 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Friday 25 July 2014 15:26:11 I wrote:
> > On Friday 25 July 2014 09:30:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:32:23 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > > > I can't use any of the other packages because I use the BBC's
> > >
On Friday 25 July 2014 15:26:11 I wrote:
> On Friday 25 July 2014 09:30:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:32:23 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > > I can't use any of the other packages because I use the BBC's radio
> > > > > streaming service every day, and none of them work wi
On Friday 25 July 2014 09:30:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:32:23 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > I can't use any of the other packages because I use the BBC's radio
> > > > streaming service every day, and none of them work with it (as far
> > > > as I know).
> > >
> > > Ha
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:32:23 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > I can't use any of the other packages because I use the BBC's radio
> > > streaming service every day, and none of them work with it (as far
> > > as I know).
> >
> > Have you looked at the get_iplayer script?
>
> No, I hadn't h
On Friday 25 July 2014 06:45:35 Mick wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 Jul 2014 10:00:00 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I can't use any of the other packages because I use the BBC's radio
> > streaming service every day, and none of them work with it (as far as I
> > know).
>
> Have you looked at the get_iplaye
On Wednesday 23 Jul 2014 10:00:00 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I can't use any of the other packages because I use the BBC's radio
> streaming service every day, and none of them work with it (as far as I
> know).
Have you looked at the get_iplayer script?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 20:41:34 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 22/07/14 19:48, Dale wrote:
> > Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> >> On 22/07/14 19:03, Dale wrote:
> >>> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > I have a couple of systems with flash that are a
>
> Are you using http-replicator? Its not clever enough to know that the
> installer has changed since the filename doesn't change, and keeps serving
> up the first one it downloads. If you remove the installer first from
> replicator's --dir, it will work.
>
> Dammit - I should look more closely
> because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest
> rebuild first. As I have to update them anyway, is there a ways to
> override the portage checksums and say install anyway?
>
Are you using http-replicator? Its not clever enough to know that the
installer has changed since t
On 22/07/14 19:48, Dale wrote:
> Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>> On 22/07/14 19:03, Dale wrote:
>>> J. Roeleveld wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update
> because the checksums fail so you have
Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 22/07/14 19:03, Dale wrote:
>> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote:
I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update
because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest
reb
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 07:31:35 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 22/07/14 19:03, Dale wrote:
> > J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> >>> I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update
> >>> because the checksums fail so you
On 22/07/14 19:03, Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>>> I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update
>>> because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest
>>> rebuild first. As I have to upd
J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>> I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update
>> because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest
>> rebuild first. As I have to update them anyway, is there a ways to
>
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:05:43 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update
> because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest
> rebuild first. As I have to update them anyway, is there a ways to
> override the portage chec
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 05:05:43 PM Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update
> because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest
> rebuild first. As I have to update them anyway, is there a ways to
> override the portage che
I have a couple of systems with flash that are always a pain to update
because the checksums fail so you have to manually force a manifest
rebuild first. As I have to update them anyway, is there a ways to
override the portage checksums and say install anyway? Because this
package always fails an
I have noticed that adobe flash isnt working and googling says some
versions have an sse2 bug.
I have the latest from portage (www-plugins/adobe-flash-11.2.202.243
with sse2check enabled)
Should it work, or should I look elsewhere.
BillK
David Haller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Dale wrote:
>> `/usr/portage/distfiles/adobe-flash-11.2.202.235.i386.tar.gz' saved
> 11.2.202.235 crashes all the time anyway (at least on x86_64), there's
> a new version 11.2.202.236 out since yesterday or so that works again.
>
> HTH,
> -dnh
Hello,
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Dale wrote:
>`/usr/portage/distfiles/adobe-flash-11.2.202.235.i386.tar.gz' saved
11.2.202.235 crashes all the time anyway (at least on x86_64), there's
a new version 11.2.202.236 out since yesterday or so that works again.
HTH,
-dnh
--
The speed at which a mistyped
Mick wrote:
> Haven't tried the latest, but it has happened here too in the past. I
> recall following pretty much what you've done to resolve this problem
> (except for the replicator thing). I seem to recall that on one
> occasion I had to try again the next day to get it to work, because I
> did
On Monday 11 Jun 2012 14:46:19 Dale wrote:
> Top posting for obvious reasons. ;-)
>
> I was thinking it could be this but this is the first time I have ever
> ran into this with adobe-flash. I wanted to sort of check into it
> before doing anything that may cause "issues' such as just redoing th
Top posting for obvious reasons. ;-)
I was thinking it could be this but this is the first time I have ever
ran into this with adobe-flash. I wanted to sort of check into it
before doing anything that may cause "issues' such as just redoing the
manifest. I did think about it tho.
Now to go re
I get this, commonly with adobe-flash and google-earth. I suspect that
they change the file content or dynamically regenerate it faster than
portage can track them/my local repos update. The only fix I have been
able to come up with is check as far as possible where the binary came
from and regene
Howdy,
I been trying to play around with versions of adobe-flash to see which
version a) works and b) doesn't crash or cause other problems. Anyway,
I was using one version, the 10 version, for a bit but am having issues
so I wanted to try a newer version. It seems tho, no matter what
version I
>
>> I thought I'd report back that while Flash continues to crash on this
>> machine only even with updates to both Firefox & adobe-flash, I tried
>> Google Chrome this morning and it works perfectly. I appears the root
>> cause of this problem would be Firefox, not Flash or nvidia-drivers,
>> an
Doesn't Google bundle a version of flash with their browser? Or is that
something that's coming in the future?
I had flash crashing a lot on my machine, and just disabled hardware
acceleration in the settings to fix it.
Alecks Gates, sent from Android on an HTC G2
On May 6, 2012 10:28 AM, "Mark
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem.
>> Hopefully I haven't missed the right thread.
>>
>> I run stable Gentoo + a few ~amd64 packages. My video adapter is an
>>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 01:22:21PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote
Do you have a really old Intel CPU, or an AMD before the K8 version?
Old Intels and and pre-K8 AMDs don't support SSE2, which is used in the
latest Flash binaries. Using instructions that don't exist on your CPU
== crash city. There's
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 8:19 PM, wrote:
> And why adobe stops the linux-support?
They are backing away from Flash in general across all platforms.
Android and Linux are first announced. Most of the thousands of
workers recently laid-off at Adobe are from the Flash area, from what
I've been told.
Paul Hartman [12-04-28 04:56]:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM, wrote:
> > Paul Hartman [12-04-28 00:20]:
> >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >> > I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem.
> >> > Hopefully I haven't missed the right thread.
> >> >
>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:34 PM, wrote:
> Paul Hartman [12-04-28 00:20]:
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> > I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem.
>> > Hopefully I haven't missed the right thread.
>> >
>> > I run stable Gentoo + a few ~amd64 packa
Paul Hartman [12-04-28 00:20]:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem.
> > Hopefully I haven't missed the right thread.
> >
> > I run stable Gentoo + a few ~amd64 packages. My video adapter is an
> > NVidia 463 GTX. S
Mark Knecht wrote:
> Thanks, I'll keep trying.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
>
I was diggin around to see if I could help in some small way but found
something weird here. I have the 11.1 version installed. It's not in
the tree tho. Since I have it installed, could I send you the ebuild
and you put
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Paul Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem.
>>> Hopefully I haven't missed the right thread.
>>>
>>> I run sta
>>> I run stable Gentoo + a few ~amd64 packages. My video adapter is an
>>> NVidia 463 GTX. Since the update to adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 a few
>>> weeks ago all Flash apps crash the plugin within Firefox. I posted a
>>> bug report here and got shot down for reasons I don't understand. (I
>>> unders
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem.
>> Hopefully I haven't missed the right thread.
>>
>> I run stable Gentoo + a few ~amd64 packages. My video adapter is an
>>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem.
> Hopefully I haven't missed the right thread.
>
> I run stable Gentoo + a few ~amd64 packages. My video adapter is an
> NVidia 463 GTX. Since the update to adobe-flash-11.2.202.228
I don't remember reading about anyone else with this problem.
Hopefully I haven't missed the right thread.
I run stable Gentoo + a few ~amd64 packages. My video adapter is an
NVidia 463 GTX. Since the update to adobe-flash-11.2.202.228 a few
weeks ago all Flash apps crash the plugin within Firefox
I use strace to trace syscalls of
`/opt/Adobe/flash-player/libflashplayer.so` and found many errors like this:
{{{
madvise(0xdf2, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0
--- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @ 0 (0) ---
madvise(0xdf2, 3424256, MADV_DONTNEED) = 0
--- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) @
On Friday 01 April 2011 22:35:39 Einux wrote:
> Adobe-flash becomes quite slow in my laptop after I updated world(or maybe I
> reconfigured kernel options) several days ago. I've made a lot of
> modifications, so I'm not sure exactly which action leads to the malfunction
> of adobe-flash.
adobe fl
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:56:56PM +0800, Einux wrote:
>Here's my lspci result:
>
>{{{
>
>00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Memory
>Controller Hub (rev 07)
>00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset PCI
>Express Graphics Por
Adobe-flash becomes quite slow in my laptop after I updated world(or maybe I
reconfigured kernel options) several days ago. I've made a lot of
modifications, so I'm not sure exactly which action leads to the malfunction
of adobe-flash.
I use the latest stable version of adobe-flash(10.2.153.1),
nv
On 06/27/2010 12:03 PM, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 27 June 2010 16:00:04 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
>> On Sunday 27 June 2010, dhk wrote:
>>> Adobe Flash use to work on my amd64 box, but after the last upgrade it
>>> stopped working. When I visit sites that use it I'm told that Adobe
>>> Flash is not insta
On Sunday 27 June 2010 16:00:04 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
> On Sunday 27 June 2010, dhk wrote:
> > Adobe Flash use to work on my amd64 box, but after the last upgrade it
> > stopped working. When I visit sites that use it I'm told that Adobe
> > Flash is not installed or to download the plugin.
> >
>
On Sunday 27 June 2010, dhk wrote:
> Adobe Flash use to work on my amd64 box, but after the last upgrade it
> stopped working. When I visit sites that use it I'm told that Adobe
> Flash is not installed or to download the plugin.
>
> In my /etc/make.conf I had to change ACCEPT_LICENSE to
> ACCEP
Adobe Flash use to work on my amd64 box, but after the last upgrade it
stopped working. When I visit sites that use it I'm told that Adobe
Flash is not installed or to download the plugin.
In my /etc/make.conf I had to change ACCEPT_LICENSE to
ACCEPT_LICENSE="AdobeFlash-10.1" and in /etc/portage/
64 matches
Mail list logo
