On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 06:18, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 01:01 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Neil Bothwick
> did opine thusly:
>
>> On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:40:32 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> > I had many posts typed out, most of them rude, all of them classic
>> > Alan, but
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:40:01AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 09:16 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Neil Bothwick
> did opine thusly:
>
>
> While we are nitpicking:
>
>
> > Douglas Adams was English, our second greatest writer,
>
>
> That should be "greatest writer
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:21 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Joost Roeleveld
did opine thusly:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 10:35:48 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 10:22 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Joost
> > Roeleveld
> >
> > did opine thusly:
> > > On Tuesday 17 May 2011 08:1
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 10:19:30 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 10:22:35 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > > telephone sanitiser - but that's nit-picking, even form me :)
> >
> > [nipick] "even form me"? :P [/nitpick]
>
> I think we should both be more careful with our typing when nit-
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 10:35:48 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Apparently, though unproven, at 10:22 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Joost
> Roeleveld
>
> did opine thusly:
> > On Tuesday 17 May 2011 08:16:20 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > Douglas Adams was English, our second greatest writer
> >
> > Who do you clas
On Tue, 17 May 2011 10:22:35 +0200, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
> > telephone sanitiser - but that's nit-picking, even form me :)
>
> [nipick] "even form me"? :P [/nitpick]
I think we should both be more careful with our typing when nit-picking :(
--
Neil Bothwick
COMMAND: A suggestion made to
On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:29:29 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Douglas Adams was English, our second greatest writer,
> That should be "greatest writer", the other fellow was not the greatest
> - he merely wrote soap operas.
I don't know what you mean, unless you mistakenly assumed I was referr
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:22 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Joost Roeleveld
did opine thusly:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 08:16:20 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > Douglas Adams was English, our second greatest writer
>
> Who do you class as the greatest English writer then?
Paula Nancy Millstone Jennin
On Tuesday 17 May 2011 08:16:20 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Douglas Adams was English, our second greatest writer
Who do you class as the greatest English writer then?
> , so that should be
> telephone sanitiser - but that's nit-picking, even form me :)
[nipick] "even form me"? :P [/nitpick]
--
Joos
Apparently, though unproven, at 09:16 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Neil Bothwick
did opine thusly:
While we are nitpicking:
> Douglas Adams was English, our second greatest writer,
That should be "greatest writer", the other fellow was not the greatest - he
merely wrote soap operas.
--
alan do
On Tue, 17 May 2011 01:49:29 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
should be
> referred to using the neuter form of pronouns, i.e. "it", as befitting
> their overall contribution to humanity.
>
> You see what I did there? You see how I recovered with a witty reposte
> without even blinking an eye? It take
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:28 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 01:10:02AM +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:40:32 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > I had many posts typed out, most of them rude, all of them classic
> > > Alan, b
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 01:10:02AM +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:40:32 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > I had many posts typed out, most of them rude, all of them classic
> > Alan, but something held me back. Lucky it went that way, he later
> > posted he read 1667MHZ as 16
On 2011/05/16 19:01 (GMT-0400) Neil Bothwick composed:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:40:32 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
he read 1667MHZ as 167MHz.
Amazing what a difference a "1" can make :-)
Not nearly as much as a "6" :P
Sure it can! In 101000b, any of those "1"s represents more than
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:01 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Neil Bothwick
did opine thusly:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:40:32 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I had many posts typed out, most of them rude, all of them classic
> > Alan, but something held me back. Lucky it went that way, he later
>
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:40:32 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> I had many posts typed out, most of them rude, all of them classic
> Alan, but something held me back. Lucky it went that way, he later
> posted he read 1667MHZ as 167MHz.
>
> Amazing what a difference a "1" can make :-)
Not nearly as mu
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:10:02PM +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 10:57:14 -0400, Indi wrote:
>
> > > Read the settings for PORTAGE_ELOG in man make.conf.
>
> > Or as that man page says,
> > "Please see /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example
> > for elog documentation."
>
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:15 on Monday 16 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 18:18 on Monday 16 May 2011, Indi did
> > opine
> >
> > thusly:
> >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
> >>> Actually after th
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:18 on Monday 16 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
Actually after the first or 2nd or some subsequent attempt that was my
plan. After so much time passed (days, not just
Thnx, have followed advice. I am impressed.
JDM
-Original Message-
From: Neil Bothwick
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 20:57:26
To:
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] chicken <--> egg (NFS & tty video) (Fixed!)
On Mon, 16 May 2011 10:57:14 -0400,
On Mon, 16 May 2011 10:57:14 -0400, Indi wrote:
> > Read the settings for PORTAGE_ELOG in man make.conf.
> Or as that man page says,
> "Please see /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example
> for elog documentation."
I know that's what the man page currently says, but I expect it will be
updat
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:18 on Monday 16 May 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
> > Actually after the first or 2nd or some subsequent attempt that was my
> > plan. After so much time passed (days, not just hours) and I had good
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:18:49PM -0400, Indi wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually after the first or 2nd or some subsequent attempt that was my
> > > plan.
> > > After so much time passed (days, not just hours) and I had good kernel,
>
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:10:02PM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
>
> Actually after the first or 2nd or some subsequent attempt that was my plan.
> After so much time passed (days, not just hours) and I had good kernel, NFS,
> and MC that I didn't see much point delaying KDE. After the errors
> dis
On 2011/05/16 11:26 (GMT-0400) Indi composed:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 05:00:02AM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2011/05/15 22:18 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
> I have two Gentoo stanzas in my primary bootloader, one to load the kernel,
> another to chainload Gentoo's Grub. Loading t
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 05:00:02AM +0200, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2011/05/15 22:18 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
>
> > I have two Gentoo stanzas in my primary bootloader, one to load the kernel,
> > another to chainload Gentoo's Grub. Loading the kernel works, but chainload
> > gives error 13 i
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 03:10:03PM +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 12:43:05 +, JDM wrote:
>
> > That's a clever trick. How do you get emails from emerge?
>
> Read the settings for PORTAGE_ELOG in man make.conf.
>
>
Or as that man page says,
"Please see /usr/share/portag
On 16/5/2011, at 1:43pm, JDM wrote:
>> Most people set things up so they get emails of the post install
>> messages when emerging things, but it is up to you to actually read them
>> and, when necessary, follow the instructions.
> That's a clever trick. How do you get emails from emerge?
$ grep
On Mon, 16 May 2011 12:43:05 +, JDM wrote:
> That's a clever trick. How do you get emails from emerge?
Read the settings for PORTAGE_ELOG in man make.conf.
--
Neil Bothwick
WinErr 001: Windows loaded - System in danger
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
That's a clever trick. How do you get emails from emerge?
JDM
-Original Message-
From: Tanstaafl
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 07:58:34
To:
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] chicken <--> egg (NFS & tty video) (Fixed!)
On 2011-05-15 10:54 PM, Fe
On 2011-05-15 10:54 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> Why setup didn't get this right via emerge I have no idea, unless it
> didn't actually do anything toward actually setting Grub up. If so, it
> could be there was already some mismatched Grub code there already from
> a previous use of the sectors there
On Sun, 15 May 2011 22:54:14 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Why setup didn't get this right via emerge I have no idea, unless it
> didn't actually do anything toward actually setting Grub up.
Emerging GRUB installs it, that's all. The post installation message
would have told you to set i up, but it
On 2011/05/15 22:18 (GMT-0400) Felix Miata composed:
I have two Gentoo stanzas in my primary bootloader, one to load the kernel,
another to chainload Gentoo's Grub. Loading the kernel works, but chainload
gives error 13 invalid executable format. I named the bzImage copied to /boot
"kernel-2.6.3
33 matches
Mail list logo
