Re: [geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century? (or much sooner)

2011-07-18 Thread rongretlarson
gone" date in the 2030's or even 2020's - and this is based on interpretations of recent data - not model outputs. It seems to me the lesson is that the global models need retuning. Ron - Original Message ----- From: "Ken Caldeira" To: "geoengineering"

Re: [geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century? (or much sooner)

2011-07-19 Thread Andrew Revkin
http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/22/new-light-shed-on-north-pole-ice-trends/ The bottom line, expressed here before, is that no one should expect to find much broad meaning in short-term variability in Arctic sea ice — in one direction or the other. If there is a death spiral, expect a lo

RE: [geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century? (or much sooner)

2011-07-19 Thread Veli Albert Kallio
last legs as they do in the mid journey. Almost none. Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:04:34 -0400 Subject: Re: [geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century? (or much sooner) From: rev...@gmail.com To: kcalde...@gmail.com CC: geoengineering@googlegroups.com http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2010

RE: [geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century? (or much sooner)

2011-07-19 Thread Eugene Gordon
At last some sanity. From: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Revkin Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 1:05 PM To: kcalde...@gmail.com Cc: geoengineering Subject: Re: [geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century? (or much sooner) http

RE: [geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century? (or much sooner)

2011-07-19 Thread Andrew Lockley
11 13:04:34 -0400 > Subject: Re: [geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century? (or much sooner) > From: rev...@gmail.com > To: kcalde...@gmail.com > CC: geoengineering@googlegroups.com > > http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/22/new-light-shed-on-north-pole-ice-trends/ >

functionally Re: [geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century? (or much sooner)

2011-07-18 Thread Emily
020's - and this is based on interpretations of recent data - not model outputs. It seems to me the lesson is that the global models need retuning. Ron ------------------------ *From: *"Ken Caldeira" *To: *"geoengineering&q

Re: functionally Re: [geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century? (or much sooner)

2011-07-18 Thread Mike MacCracken
slowski has >> supported 2013 as not being out of the question. (and still does) >> >> I don't believe we have the luxury of relying on a "gone" date in >> the 2030's or even 2020's - and this is based on interpretations of >> recent data

Re: functionally Re: [geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century? (or much sooner)

2011-07-18 Thread Emily
x27;s - and this is based on interpretations of recent data - not model outputs. It seems to me the lesson is that the global models need retuning. Ron ------------------------------------ *From: *"Ken Caldeira" *To: *"geoengineering" *Sent: *Monday, Ju

Re: functionally Re: [geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century? (or much sooner)

2011-07-18 Thread Mike MacCracken
s >>>> year). The following 2008 cite is given in the above URL for a >>>> Maslowski Ppt: >>>> >>>> http://www.ees.hokudai.ac.jp/coe21/dc2008/DC/report/Maslowski.pdf >>>> >>>> His work doesn't show up in literature comp

Re: functionally Re: [geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century? (or much sooner)

2011-07-18 Thread Emily
t seems to me the lesson is that the global models need retuning. Ron ---------------------------------------- *From: *"Ken Caldeira" *To: *"geoengineering" *Sent: *Monday, July 18, 2011 6:41:17 AM *Subject: *[geo] September sea-ice gone by end of century