Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming

2012-03-19 Thread Alan Robock
Dear Mike, I don't know how you do this 6 to 1 calculation. We found that the e-folding time for stratospheric aerosols in the Arctic s 2-4 months, with 4 months in the summer, the relevant time. (see http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/pdf/2008JD010050small.pdf ) If we compare this to the

RE: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming - tropospheric health effects.

2012-03-19 Thread John Latham
Caldeira; Andrew Lockley; Geoengineering; j.e.kristjans...@geo.uio.no Subject: Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming Dear Mike, I don't know how you do this 6 to 1 calculation. We found that the e-folding time for stratospheric aerosols in the Arctic s 2-4 months, with 4 months in the summer

Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming

2012-03-19 Thread Stephen Salter
Alan Pollution is a loaded word. Check out http://www.healthandcare.co.uk/great-gifts/salitair-salt-therapy.html?gclid=CNKH0-ur864CFdISfAodwHUpNA for evidence that breathing salt is very good for people with lung diseases. Osmosis is just as effective as anti-biotics at killing bugs but

Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming

2012-03-19 Thread Mike MacCracken
Hi Alan—Well, I got the 2 months number from your paper—and used that. Interesting that a more detailed evaluation indicates that the lifetime in summer is longer. I think longer times than a week might well be possible in the troposphere by choosing injection times and meteorological conditions,

RE: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming

2012-03-19 Thread David Keith
@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Alan Robock Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:03 AM To: mmacc...@comcast.net Cc: Stephen Salter; Ken Caldeira; Andrew Lockley; Geoengineering; j.e.kristjans...@geo.uio.no Subject: Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming Dear Mike, I don't know how you do this 6 to 1 calculation

RE: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming

2012-03-19 Thread David Keith
Salter; Ken Caldeira; Andrew Lockley; Geoengineering; j.e.kristjans...@geo.uio.no Subject: Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming Hi Alan-Well, I got the 2 months number from your paper-and used that. Interesting that a more detailed evaluation indicates that the lifetime in summer is longer. I

Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming

2012-03-19 Thread Alan Robock
Dear Mike, The paper says: There is a clear seasonal cycle in the e-folding lifetime of the stratospheric aerosols in the Arctic case ranging from 2 to 4 months. The maximum lifetime occurs during boreal summer with a minimum during boreal winter with the formation of the polar vortex and

Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming

2012-03-19 Thread Andrew Lockley
Doesn't lifetime depend massively on injection height particle size? Size in turn depends on precursor, injection density, weather etc. What is the latest thinking on the preferred precursor and injection conditions? Acid mist, SO2 or H2S? A On Mar 19, 2012 4:43 PM, Mike MacCracken

Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming

2012-03-19 Thread Mike MacCracken
...@envsci.rutgers.edu New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551 USA http://envsci.rutgers.edu/~robock On 3/19/2012 9:42 AM, Mike MacCracken wrote: Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming Hi Alan—Well, I got the 2 months number from your paper—and used that. Interesting that a more detailed

Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming

2012-03-18 Thread Andrew Lockley
For clarity, I've never used or advocated this 10C figure, just explained where I think it was from. I don't think CCN manipulation in the arctic is expected. From what I understand It's proposed that any local cooling will be at lower latitudes, on water headed to the arctic. It's been pointed

Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming

2012-03-18 Thread Stephen Salter
Mike I had thought that the plan was stratospheric aerosol to be released at low latitudes and would slowly migrate to the poles where is would gracefully descend. If you can be sure that it will all have gone in 10 days then my concerns vanish. But if the air cannot get through the water

RE: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming

2012-03-18 Thread David Keith
: geoengineering@googlegroups.com [mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Salter Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 10:52 AM To: mmacc...@comcast.net Cc: Ken Caldeira; Andrew Lockley; Geoengineering; j.e.kristjans...@geo.uio.no Subject: Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming Mike I

Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming

2012-03-18 Thread Mike MacCracken
Hi Stephen--My wording must have been confusing. For stratospheric injections at low latitudes, the lifetime is 1-2 years. The aerosols do move poleward and are carried into the troposphere in mid and high latitudes. This is one approach to trying to limit global climate change, and, as David

Re: [geo] Source on SRM causing warming

2012-03-17 Thread Mike MacCracken
The Robock et al simulations of an Arctic injection found that the lifetime of particles in the lower Arctic stratosphere was only two months. In that one would only need particles up during the sunlit season (say three months, for only really helps after the sea ice surface has melted and the sun